失效模式及效果分析在外科患者围手术期安全检查中的应用

玲 林
{"title":"失效模式及效果分析在外科患者围手术期安全检查中的应用","authors":"玲 林","doi":"10.12677/hjs.2023.124004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the application effect of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) in perioperative safety check of surgical patients. Methods: Based on FMEA, 540 surgical patients from January to June 2020 were selected as the control group, and 540 surgical patients from January to June 2021 were served as the observation group. By analyzing the failure modes of the perioperative safety verification process of surgical patients, 13 failure modes were identified as the key points for improvement and corrective measures were developed. The Risk Priority Number (RPN) before and after failure mode and effect analysis was compared, as well as the accuracy rate of surgical safety verification and surgical identification, and the effectiveness of rectification was evaluated. Results: The mean RPN value before and after FMEA management decreased from 184 to 48.5; the accuracy of surgical safety check increased from 95.45% to 99.42% with a statistical difference (P < 0.01); the correct rate of surgical identification increased from 98.84% to 99.90%, but no statistical difference was observed (P ˃ 0.05). Conclusion: As used for perioperative safety verification of surgical patients, FMEA is very helpful in identifying potential defects in process improvement, significantly reduces the risk priority index and increases the accuracy of surgical safety check.","PeriodicalId":67890,"journal":{"name":"外科(汉斯)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis in Perioperative Safety Check of Surgical Patients\",\"authors\":\"玲 林\",\"doi\":\"10.12677/hjs.2023.124004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the application effect of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) in perioperative safety check of surgical patients. Methods: Based on FMEA, 540 surgical patients from January to June 2020 were selected as the control group, and 540 surgical patients from January to June 2021 were served as the observation group. By analyzing the failure modes of the perioperative safety verification process of surgical patients, 13 failure modes were identified as the key points for improvement and corrective measures were developed. The Risk Priority Number (RPN) before and after failure mode and effect analysis was compared, as well as the accuracy rate of surgical safety verification and surgical identification, and the effectiveness of rectification was evaluated. Results: The mean RPN value before and after FMEA management decreased from 184 to 48.5; the accuracy of surgical safety check increased from 95.45% to 99.42% with a statistical difference (P < 0.01); the correct rate of surgical identification increased from 98.84% to 99.90%, but no statistical difference was observed (P ˃ 0.05). Conclusion: As used for perioperative safety verification of surgical patients, FMEA is very helpful in identifying potential defects in process improvement, significantly reduces the risk priority index and increases the accuracy of surgical safety check.\",\"PeriodicalId\":67890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"外科(汉斯)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"外科(汉斯)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12677/hjs.2023.124004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"外科(汉斯)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12677/hjs.2023.124004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis in Perioperative Safety Check of Surgical Patients
Objective: To evaluate the application effect of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) in perioperative safety check of surgical patients. Methods: Based on FMEA, 540 surgical patients from January to June 2020 were selected as the control group, and 540 surgical patients from January to June 2021 were served as the observation group. By analyzing the failure modes of the perioperative safety verification process of surgical patients, 13 failure modes were identified as the key points for improvement and corrective measures were developed. The Risk Priority Number (RPN) before and after failure mode and effect analysis was compared, as well as the accuracy rate of surgical safety verification and surgical identification, and the effectiveness of rectification was evaluated. Results: The mean RPN value before and after FMEA management decreased from 184 to 48.5; the accuracy of surgical safety check increased from 95.45% to 99.42% with a statistical difference (P < 0.01); the correct rate of surgical identification increased from 98.84% to 99.90%, but no statistical difference was observed (P ˃ 0.05). Conclusion: As used for perioperative safety verification of surgical patients, FMEA is very helpful in identifying potential defects in process improvement, significantly reduces the risk priority index and increases the accuracy of surgical safety check.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信