墨西哥盆地古典时期和后古典时期人口之间的长期进程

IF 1.1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Abigail Meza-Peñaloza, Federico Zertuche, Josefina Bautista-Martínez
{"title":"墨西哥盆地古典时期和后古典时期人口之间的长期进程","authors":"Abigail Meza-Peñaloza,&nbsp;Federico Zertuche,&nbsp;Josefina Bautista-Martínez","doi":"10.1002/oa.3260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study of nonmetric traits is useful for establishing biological differences or affinities between populations. This study considered 12 nonmetric cranial characters. The objective is to compare five series of two different cultural horizons: three populations of the Teotihuacán Classic period and two of the Mexica Postclassic period. For the selection of nonmetric traits, those not altered by intentional cephalic modification were considered. From the sample of materials, it was assessed whether the populations of the Classic period could have biological and cultural affinity between them, making a migratory interpretation which indicates differences in nonmetric characters between them. The mean measure of divergence (MMD) was considered as bio-distance. The distance matrix was analyzed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean and nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Frequencies were studied using the principal component analysis. Mantel test and partial Mantel test were used to compare the distance matrix obtained with the MMD with sites geographical distance matrix, type of settlements matrix, and period of the site's matrix. In none of those cases were found a correlation at the \n<math>\n <mi>α</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>0.05</mn></math> level. Making more plausible that the results of the nonmetric traits MMD matrix agree with a migration process. All methods agree on separating Classical populations into one group and Postclassic populations into another. The archeological contexts, and the study of the material culture found, agree with the analysis of nonmetric characters.</p>","PeriodicalId":14179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","volume":"33 6","pages":"1018-1027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oa.3260","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term processes between Classic and Postclassic populations in the Mexico basin\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Meza-Peñaloza,&nbsp;Federico Zertuche,&nbsp;Josefina Bautista-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oa.3260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study of nonmetric traits is useful for establishing biological differences or affinities between populations. This study considered 12 nonmetric cranial characters. The objective is to compare five series of two different cultural horizons: three populations of the Teotihuacán Classic period and two of the Mexica Postclassic period. For the selection of nonmetric traits, those not altered by intentional cephalic modification were considered. From the sample of materials, it was assessed whether the populations of the Classic period could have biological and cultural affinity between them, making a migratory interpretation which indicates differences in nonmetric characters between them. The mean measure of divergence (MMD) was considered as bio-distance. The distance matrix was analyzed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean and nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Frequencies were studied using the principal component analysis. Mantel test and partial Mantel test were used to compare the distance matrix obtained with the MMD with sites geographical distance matrix, type of settlements matrix, and period of the site's matrix. In none of those cases were found a correlation at the \\n<math>\\n <mi>α</mi>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>0.05</mn></math> level. Making more plausible that the results of the nonmetric traits MMD matrix agree with a migration process. All methods agree on separating Classical populations into one group and Postclassic populations into another. The archeological contexts, and the study of the material culture found, agree with the analysis of nonmetric characters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"1018-1027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oa.3260\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.3260\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.3260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非计量性状的研究有助于确定种群间的生物学差异或亲缘关系。本研究考虑了12个非度量的颅骨特征。目的是比较两种不同文化视野的五个系列:Teotihuacán古典时期的三个种群和墨西哥后古典时期的两个种群。对于非度量性状的选择,那些没有被有意的头侧修饰改变的性状被考虑在内。从材料样本中,评估了古典时期的种群之间是否具有生物和文化亲和力,并做出了迁移解释,表明它们之间的非度量特征存在差异。平均散度测量(MMD)被认为是生物距离。采用非度量多维标度和算术平均的非加权对群法对距离矩阵进行分析。使用主成分分析研究频率。利用Mantel检验和部分Mantel检验将MMD得到的距离矩阵与站点的地理距离矩阵、聚落类型矩阵和站点的周期矩阵进行比较。在这些病例中没有发现在α = 0.05水平上的相关性。使得非度量特征MMD矩阵的结果更符合迁移过程。所有的方法都同意将古典种群分为一组,后古典种群分为另一组。考古背景和对发现的物质文化的研究,与对非计量文字的分析一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Long-term processes between Classic and Postclassic populations in the Mexico basin

Long-term processes between Classic and Postclassic populations in the Mexico basin

The study of nonmetric traits is useful for establishing biological differences or affinities between populations. This study considered 12 nonmetric cranial characters. The objective is to compare five series of two different cultural horizons: three populations of the Teotihuacán Classic period and two of the Mexica Postclassic period. For the selection of nonmetric traits, those not altered by intentional cephalic modification were considered. From the sample of materials, it was assessed whether the populations of the Classic period could have biological and cultural affinity between them, making a migratory interpretation which indicates differences in nonmetric characters between them. The mean measure of divergence (MMD) was considered as bio-distance. The distance matrix was analyzed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean and nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Frequencies were studied using the principal component analysis. Mantel test and partial Mantel test were used to compare the distance matrix obtained with the MMD with sites geographical distance matrix, type of settlements matrix, and period of the site's matrix. In none of those cases were found a correlation at the α = 0.05 level. Making more plausible that the results of the nonmetric traits MMD matrix agree with a migration process. All methods agree on separating Classical populations into one group and Postclassic populations into another. The archeological contexts, and the study of the material culture found, agree with the analysis of nonmetric characters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: The aim of the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology is to provide a forum for the publication of papers dealing with all aspects of the study of human and animal bones from archaeological contexts. The journal will publish original papers dealing with human or animal bone research from any area of the world. It will also publish short papers which give important preliminary observations from work in progress and it will publish book reviews. All papers will be subject to peer review. The journal will be aimed principally towards all those with a professional interest in the study of human and animal bones. This includes archaeologists, anthropologists, human and animal bone specialists, palaeopathologists and medical historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信