{"title":"波格丹诺夫的人本观:合作与“聚人”问题的关系(致科学家诞辰150周年)","authors":"Dmitrii K. Stozhko, Konstantin P. Stozhko","doi":"10.15507/2078-9823.063.023.202303.311-323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The purpose of the study is to assess the significance and substantiate the humanistic nature of the creative heritage of A. A. Bogdanov in the new social reality. The objectives of the study are: a comparative analysis of the philosophical and socio-economic content of the works of A. A. Bogdanov; critical comparison of the theoretical and methodological approaches existing in modern science to understanding the basic ideas of the scientist; revealing their theoretical and practical significance, taking into account the new social reality. Materials and Methods. The basis for writing the article was the writings of A. A. Bogdanov himself, as well as scientific studies of his work, which have appeared over the past twenty years. The study used structural-functional and program-targeted approaches, methods of analysis, synthesis, generalizations and axiology, as well as historical-retrospective, historical-genetic and hermeneutic research methods. Results. On the example of the socio-philosophical concepts of “gathering a person” and “collective personality”, A. A. Bogdanov’s contribution to the formulation and development of scientific ideas about socialism, humanism, social responsibility and social justice is shown. The humanistic nature of A. A. Bogdanov’s ideas about social cooperation and state structure in a truly humane society is revealed, which distinguishes his views from the ideas of Western European socialists – utopianists and humanists of the Renaissance. The distinctive features of the humanistic philosophy of A. A. Bogdanov from “orthodox Marxism” and liberalism are revealed. Discussion and Conclusion. On the basis of different scientific approaches that have developed in historical, economic and philosophical science, the polymorphism of tabooing the creative heritage of A. A. Bogdanov and the growing need for its further study, taking into account modern “time challenges”, are revealed.","PeriodicalId":494773,"journal":{"name":"Гуманитарий","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Humanistic Views of A. A. Bogdanov: Relations of Cooperation and the Problem of “Gathering a Person” (to the 150th Anniversary of the Birth of a Scientist)\",\"authors\":\"Dmitrii K. Stozhko, Konstantin P. Stozhko\",\"doi\":\"10.15507/2078-9823.063.023.202303.311-323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The purpose of the study is to assess the significance and substantiate the humanistic nature of the creative heritage of A. A. Bogdanov in the new social reality. The objectives of the study are: a comparative analysis of the philosophical and socio-economic content of the works of A. A. Bogdanov; critical comparison of the theoretical and methodological approaches existing in modern science to understanding the basic ideas of the scientist; revealing their theoretical and practical significance, taking into account the new social reality. Materials and Methods. The basis for writing the article was the writings of A. A. Bogdanov himself, as well as scientific studies of his work, which have appeared over the past twenty years. The study used structural-functional and program-targeted approaches, methods of analysis, synthesis, generalizations and axiology, as well as historical-retrospective, historical-genetic and hermeneutic research methods. Results. On the example of the socio-philosophical concepts of “gathering a person” and “collective personality”, A. A. Bogdanov’s contribution to the formulation and development of scientific ideas about socialism, humanism, social responsibility and social justice is shown. The humanistic nature of A. A. Bogdanov’s ideas about social cooperation and state structure in a truly humane society is revealed, which distinguishes his views from the ideas of Western European socialists – utopianists and humanists of the Renaissance. The distinctive features of the humanistic philosophy of A. A. Bogdanov from “orthodox Marxism” and liberalism are revealed. Discussion and Conclusion. On the basis of different scientific approaches that have developed in historical, economic and philosophical science, the polymorphism of tabooing the creative heritage of A. A. Bogdanov and the growing need for its further study, taking into account modern “time challenges”, are revealed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":494773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Гуманитарий\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Гуманитарий\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15507/2078-9823.063.023.202303.311-323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Гуманитарий","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/2078-9823.063.023.202303.311-323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍。本文的研究目的在于评价波格丹诺夫创作遗产在新的社会现实中的意义和人文内涵。本研究的目的是:比较分析a . a .波格丹诺夫作品的哲学和社会经济内容;现代科学中存在的理解科学家基本思想的理论和方法的批判性比较揭示其理论意义和现实意义,兼顾新的社会现实。材料与方法。撰写这篇文章的基础是A. A.波格丹诺夫本人的著作,以及对他的工作的科学研究,这些研究在过去二十年中出现。该研究使用了结构-功能和方案目标方法,分析、综合、概括和价值论方法,以及历史-回顾、历史-遗传和解释学研究方法。结果。以“聚集一个人”和“集体人格”的社会哲学概念为例,说明波格丹诺夫对社会主义、人文主义、社会责任和社会正义等科学思想的形成和发展所作的贡献。波格丹诺夫关于真正人道社会中的社会合作和国家结构的思想具有人文主义的本质,这是他区别于西欧社会主义者——乌托邦主义者和文艺复兴时期的人文主义者的观点。从“正统马克思主义”和自由主义两方面揭示了波格丹诺夫人文主义哲学的鲜明特征。讨论与结论。在历史科学、经济科学和哲学科学发展的不同科学方法的基础上,揭示了A. A.波格丹诺夫禁忌创作遗产的多态性,以及考虑到现代“时间挑战”,对其进行进一步研究的日益增长的需求。
Humanistic Views of A. A. Bogdanov: Relations of Cooperation and the Problem of “Gathering a Person” (to the 150th Anniversary of the Birth of a Scientist)
Introduction. The purpose of the study is to assess the significance and substantiate the humanistic nature of the creative heritage of A. A. Bogdanov in the new social reality. The objectives of the study are: a comparative analysis of the philosophical and socio-economic content of the works of A. A. Bogdanov; critical comparison of the theoretical and methodological approaches existing in modern science to understanding the basic ideas of the scientist; revealing their theoretical and practical significance, taking into account the new social reality. Materials and Methods. The basis for writing the article was the writings of A. A. Bogdanov himself, as well as scientific studies of his work, which have appeared over the past twenty years. The study used structural-functional and program-targeted approaches, methods of analysis, synthesis, generalizations and axiology, as well as historical-retrospective, historical-genetic and hermeneutic research methods. Results. On the example of the socio-philosophical concepts of “gathering a person” and “collective personality”, A. A. Bogdanov’s contribution to the formulation and development of scientific ideas about socialism, humanism, social responsibility and social justice is shown. The humanistic nature of A. A. Bogdanov’s ideas about social cooperation and state structure in a truly humane society is revealed, which distinguishes his views from the ideas of Western European socialists – utopianists and humanists of the Renaissance. The distinctive features of the humanistic philosophy of A. A. Bogdanov from “orthodox Marxism” and liberalism are revealed. Discussion and Conclusion. On the basis of different scientific approaches that have developed in historical, economic and philosophical science, the polymorphism of tabooing the creative heritage of A. A. Bogdanov and the growing need for its further study, taking into account modern “time challenges”, are revealed.