对人的自我的新认识:李泽厚的“主体性”

IF 0.1 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Jana S. Rošker
{"title":"对人的自我的新认识:李泽厚的“主体性”","authors":"Jana S. Rošker","doi":"10.1080/27683524.2023.2206313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractLi Zehou’s concept of subjectality (zhutixing) is a central component of his philosophical system. In explaining this concept, Li has expanded the concept of the human Self in post-revolutionary modernity. This article explores the foundations of this concept, its significance in contemporary Chinese theory, and shows that it represents a call for a new kind of humanism. Using a multidimensional comparative approach, it will illustrate how Li’s concept of subjectality has the potential to fill the currently prevailing “value vacuum” and transform postmodern alienation into a truly fulfilling “human condition” that can be actively realized and practiced in a free society of autonomous individuals. Notes1 Li and Cauvel, Four Essays, 94.2 Cauvel, “The Transformative Power,” 156.3 Chandler, “Li Zehou,” 278.4 Li, Renleixue, 173.5 See, for example, Li, “Subjectivity,” 174; Li, “Guanyu,” 14.6 Bruya, “Li Zehou’s,” 138.7 However, Li Zehou’s theory cannot be solely reduced to a simple drawing from the ideas of Marx and Kant. Instead, he uses Marx as a starting point to reexamine issues originally proposed by Kant, with the goal of resolving problems stemming from Kant’s theoretical approach. In doing so, Li aims to overcome Kant’s idealist limitations and restore Kantian rationality within a materialist and historical framework. Through this process of incorporating both Marx and Kant, Li seeks to improve and “reinvent” the traditional concept of practice within historical materialism.8 For example, Wang, “Li Zehou,” 21.9 Li, “Kangde,” 5.10 Lin, “Search,” 979.11 孔门由“礼”归“仁”, 以“仁”为体, 这是一条由人而神, 由“人道”现“天道”, 从“人心”建“天心”的路。从而, 是人为天地立“心”, 而非天地为人立“心”。 Li, Renleixue, 180.12 Gu, “Subjectivity,” 210.13 Lin, 982.14 个体主体性表现在近现代西方思潮和当代中国的人道主义呐喊中, 它们大都只是对各种异化的抗议和反抗, 并无真正坚实的理论成果。Li, Renleixue, 125.15 Wang, “Li Zehou,” 95.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJana S. RoškerProfessor Jana S. Rošker studied Sinology and received her PhD from the Vienna University. She is the first Slovenian Sinologist, co-founder and long-time head of the Department of Asian Studies at the University of Ljubljana (Slovenia). In total, she spent over ten years in China and Taiwan at various universities and research institutes. To date, she has published twenty-six books and over one hundred and fifty articles and book chapters. Her major work on Li Zehou includes Following His Own Path: Li Zehou and Contemporary Chinese Philosophy and Becoming Human—Li Zehou’s Ethics. She is editor in chief of the journal Asian Studies, vice president of the International Society for Chinese Philosophy (ISCP), and founder, first president, and honorary member of the European Association of Chinese Philosophy (EACP). She has been honored with several prestigious academic prizes and awards at the national and international levels.","PeriodicalId":29655,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Literature and Thought Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Understanding of the Human Self: Li Zehou’s “Subjectality”\",\"authors\":\"Jana S. Rošker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/27683524.2023.2206313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractLi Zehou’s concept of subjectality (zhutixing) is a central component of his philosophical system. In explaining this concept, Li has expanded the concept of the human Self in post-revolutionary modernity. This article explores the foundations of this concept, its significance in contemporary Chinese theory, and shows that it represents a call for a new kind of humanism. Using a multidimensional comparative approach, it will illustrate how Li’s concept of subjectality has the potential to fill the currently prevailing “value vacuum” and transform postmodern alienation into a truly fulfilling “human condition” that can be actively realized and practiced in a free society of autonomous individuals. Notes1 Li and Cauvel, Four Essays, 94.2 Cauvel, “The Transformative Power,” 156.3 Chandler, “Li Zehou,” 278.4 Li, Renleixue, 173.5 See, for example, Li, “Subjectivity,” 174; Li, “Guanyu,” 14.6 Bruya, “Li Zehou’s,” 138.7 However, Li Zehou’s theory cannot be solely reduced to a simple drawing from the ideas of Marx and Kant. Instead, he uses Marx as a starting point to reexamine issues originally proposed by Kant, with the goal of resolving problems stemming from Kant’s theoretical approach. In doing so, Li aims to overcome Kant’s idealist limitations and restore Kantian rationality within a materialist and historical framework. Through this process of incorporating both Marx and Kant, Li seeks to improve and “reinvent” the traditional concept of practice within historical materialism.8 For example, Wang, “Li Zehou,” 21.9 Li, “Kangde,” 5.10 Lin, “Search,” 979.11 孔门由“礼”归“仁”, 以“仁”为体, 这是一条由人而神, 由“人道”现“天道”, 从“人心”建“天心”的路。从而, 是人为天地立“心”, 而非天地为人立“心”。 Li, Renleixue, 180.12 Gu, “Subjectivity,” 210.13 Lin, 982.14 个体主体性表现在近现代西方思潮和当代中国的人道主义呐喊中, 它们大都只是对各种异化的抗议和反抗, 并无真正坚实的理论成果。Li, Renleixue, 125.15 Wang, “Li Zehou,” 95.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJana S. RoškerProfessor Jana S. Rošker studied Sinology and received her PhD from the Vienna University. She is the first Slovenian Sinologist, co-founder and long-time head of the Department of Asian Studies at the University of Ljubljana (Slovenia). In total, she spent over ten years in China and Taiwan at various universities and research institutes. To date, she has published twenty-six books and over one hundred and fifty articles and book chapters. Her major work on Li Zehou includes Following His Own Path: Li Zehou and Contemporary Chinese Philosophy and Becoming Human—Li Zehou’s Ethics. She is editor in chief of the journal Asian Studies, vice president of the International Society for Chinese Philosophy (ISCP), and founder, first president, and honorary member of the European Association of Chinese Philosophy (EACP). She has been honored with several prestigious academic prizes and awards at the national and international levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Literature and Thought Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Literature and Thought Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/27683524.2023.2206313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Literature and Thought Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27683524.2023.2206313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要李泽厚的主体性思想是其哲学体系的重要组成部分。在解释这一概念时,李扩展了后革命现代性中人类自我的概念。本文探讨了这一概念的基础及其在当代中国理论中的意义,并表明它代表了一种新的人文主义的呼唤。利用多维度的比较方法,它将说明李的主体性概念如何有潜力填补当前盛行的“价值真空”,并将后现代异化转化为真正实现的“人类状态”,这种状态可以在自主个体的自由社会中积极实现和实践。注1李和考维尔,四篇论文,94.2考维尔,“变革的力量”,156.3钱德勒,“李泽厚”,278.4李,任磊学,173.5例如,参见李,“主体性”,174;然而,李泽厚的理论不能仅仅归结为简单地借鉴马克思和康德的思想。相反,他以马克思为出发点,重新审视康德最初提出的问题,目的是解决康德的理论方法所产生的问题。在此过程中,李的目标是克服康德唯心主义的局限性,并在唯物主义和历史框架内恢复康德的理性。通过结合马克思和康德的这一过程,李试图在历史唯物主义中改进和“重塑”传统的实践概念例如,王,李“李泽厚,“21.9”Kangde,”林5.10,“搜索”,979.11孔门由“礼”归“仁”,以“仁”为体,这是一条由人而神,由“人道“现”天道”,从“人”心建“天心”的路。从而, 是人为天地立“心”, 而非天地为人立“心”。 顾Renleixue, 180.12,“主体性”,210.13,982.14个体主体性表现在近现代西方思潮和当代中国的人道主义呐喊中,它们大都只是对各种异化的抗议和反抗,并无真正坚实的理论成果。李仁雷学,125.15,王,“李泽厚”,95。Jana S. RoškerProfessor Jana S. Rošker研究汉学,在维也纳大学获得博士学位。她是斯洛文尼亚第一位汉学家,卢布尔雅那大学亚洲研究系的联合创始人和长期负责人。她在中国大陆和台湾的多所大学和研究机构工作了十多年。到目前为止,她已经出版了26本书,超过150篇文章和书籍章节。主要著作有《走自己的路:李泽厚与当代中国哲学》、《做人》、《李泽厚伦理学》等。她是《亚洲研究》杂志主编,国际中国哲学学会(ISCP)副会长,欧洲中国哲学协会(EACP)创始人、首任会长和名誉会员。她曾多次获得国内外著名的学术奖项和奖项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Understanding of the Human Self: Li Zehou’s “Subjectality”
AbstractLi Zehou’s concept of subjectality (zhutixing) is a central component of his philosophical system. In explaining this concept, Li has expanded the concept of the human Self in post-revolutionary modernity. This article explores the foundations of this concept, its significance in contemporary Chinese theory, and shows that it represents a call for a new kind of humanism. Using a multidimensional comparative approach, it will illustrate how Li’s concept of subjectality has the potential to fill the currently prevailing “value vacuum” and transform postmodern alienation into a truly fulfilling “human condition” that can be actively realized and practiced in a free society of autonomous individuals. Notes1 Li and Cauvel, Four Essays, 94.2 Cauvel, “The Transformative Power,” 156.3 Chandler, “Li Zehou,” 278.4 Li, Renleixue, 173.5 See, for example, Li, “Subjectivity,” 174; Li, “Guanyu,” 14.6 Bruya, “Li Zehou’s,” 138.7 However, Li Zehou’s theory cannot be solely reduced to a simple drawing from the ideas of Marx and Kant. Instead, he uses Marx as a starting point to reexamine issues originally proposed by Kant, with the goal of resolving problems stemming from Kant’s theoretical approach. In doing so, Li aims to overcome Kant’s idealist limitations and restore Kantian rationality within a materialist and historical framework. Through this process of incorporating both Marx and Kant, Li seeks to improve and “reinvent” the traditional concept of practice within historical materialism.8 For example, Wang, “Li Zehou,” 21.9 Li, “Kangde,” 5.10 Lin, “Search,” 979.11 孔门由“礼”归“仁”, 以“仁”为体, 这是一条由人而神, 由“人道”现“天道”, 从“人心”建“天心”的路。从而, 是人为天地立“心”, 而非天地为人立“心”。 Li, Renleixue, 180.12 Gu, “Subjectivity,” 210.13 Lin, 982.14 个体主体性表现在近现代西方思潮和当代中国的人道主义呐喊中, 它们大都只是对各种异化的抗议和反抗, 并无真正坚实的理论成果。Li, Renleixue, 125.15 Wang, “Li Zehou,” 95.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJana S. RoškerProfessor Jana S. Rošker studied Sinology and received her PhD from the Vienna University. She is the first Slovenian Sinologist, co-founder and long-time head of the Department of Asian Studies at the University of Ljubljana (Slovenia). In total, she spent over ten years in China and Taiwan at various universities and research institutes. To date, she has published twenty-six books and over one hundred and fifty articles and book chapters. Her major work on Li Zehou includes Following His Own Path: Li Zehou and Contemporary Chinese Philosophy and Becoming Human—Li Zehou’s Ethics. She is editor in chief of the journal Asian Studies, vice president of the International Society for Chinese Philosophy (ISCP), and founder, first president, and honorary member of the European Association of Chinese Philosophy (EACP). She has been honored with several prestigious academic prizes and awards at the national and international levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信