弥尔顿的联盟

IF 0.9 4区社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES

Representations Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1525/rep.2023.164.3.51

Tom Clayton

{"title":"弥尔顿的联盟","authors":"Tom Clayton","doi":"10.1525/rep.2023.164.3.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes “coalition” as an organizing dynamic for opposition politics that influenced an emergent conception of religious toleration in the English Civil Wars. Through readings of John Milton’s Areopagitica (1644), and in comparisons with his immediate forbears and contemporaries, the article distinguishes this conception of toleration from later liberal formulations. In closing, it argues that the formal dynamics of coalition also characterize the marital relationship of Adam and Eve after the fall in Milton’s epic Paradise Lost (1667, 1674).","PeriodicalId":47353,"journal":{"name":"Representations","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Milton’s Coalitions\",\"authors\":\"Tom Clayton\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/rep.2023.164.3.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article proposes “coalition” as an organizing dynamic for opposition politics that influenced an emergent conception of religious toleration in the English Civil Wars. Through readings of John Milton’s Areopagitica (1644), and in comparisons with his immediate forbears and contemporaries, the article distinguishes this conception of toleration from later liberal formulations. In closing, it argues that the formal dynamics of coalition also characterize the marital relationship of Adam and Eve after the fall in Milton’s epic Paradise Lost (1667, 1674).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Representations\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Representations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2023.164.3.51\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Representations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2023.164.3.51","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出“联盟”作为反对派政治的组织动力，影响了英国内战中新兴的宗教宽容概念。通过阅读约翰·弥尔顿的《论出版自由》(1644)，并与他的先辈和同时代人进行比较，本文将这种宽容的概念与后来的自由主义公式区分开来。最后，它认为，在弥尔顿的史诗《失乐园》(1667,1674)中，亚当和夏娃堕落后的婚姻关系，也体现了联合的形式动力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Milton’s Coalitions

This article proposes “coalition” as an organizing dynamic for opposition politics that influenced an emergent conception of religious toleration in the English Civil Wars. Through readings of John Milton’s Areopagitica (1644), and in comparisons with his immediate forbears and contemporaries, the article distinguishes this conception of toleration from later liberal formulations. In closing, it argues that the formal dynamics of coalition also characterize the marital relationship of Adam and Eve after the fall in Milton’s epic Paradise Lost (1667, 1674).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Representations Multiple-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： An interdisciplinary journal edited by renowned scholars, Representations publishes trend-setting articles and criticism in a wide variety of fields in the humanities. In addition to special topical issues, tributes, and forums, inside you’ll find insightful coverage of: •The Body, Gender, and Sexuality •Culture and Law •Empire, Imperialism, and The New World •History and Memory •Narrative and Poetics •National Identities •Politics and Aesthetics •Philosophy and Religion •Race and Ethnicity •Science Studies •Society, Class, and Power •Visual Culture