肿瘤负荷结合机器学习算法对局部晚期鼻咽癌患者总生存期的预测功能及其在指导管理决策中的价值

IF 7.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yang Liu , Shiran Sun , Ye Zhang , Xiaodong Huang , Kai Wang , Yuan Qu , Xuesong Chen , Runye Wu , Jianghu Zhang , Jingwei Luo , Yexiong Li , Jingbo Wang , Junlin Yi
{"title":"肿瘤负荷结合机器学习算法对局部晚期鼻咽癌患者总生存期的预测功能及其在指导管理决策中的价值","authors":"Yang Liu ,&nbsp;Shiran Sun ,&nbsp;Ye Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Huang ,&nbsp;Kai Wang ,&nbsp;Yuan Qu ,&nbsp;Xuesong Chen ,&nbsp;Runye Wu ,&nbsp;Jianghu Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingwei Luo ,&nbsp;Yexiong Li ,&nbsp;Jingbo Wang ,&nbsp;Junlin Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Accurate prognostic predictions and personalized decision-making on induction chemotherapy (IC) for individuals with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) remain challenging. This research examined the predictive function of tumor burden-incorporated machine-learning algorithms for overall survival (OS) and their value in guiding treatment in patients with LA-NPC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Individuals with LA-NPC were reviewed retrospectively. Tumor burden signature-based OS prediction models were established using a nomogram and two machine-learning methods, the interpretable eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) risk prediction model, and DeepHit time-to-event neural network. The models' prediction performances were compared using the concordance index (C-index) and the area under the curve (AUC). The patients were divided into two cohorts based on the risk predictions of the most successful model. The efficacy of IC combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was compared to that of chemoradiotherapy alone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 1 221 eligible individuals, assigned to the training (<em>n</em> = 813) or validation (<em>n</em> = 408) set, showed significant respective differences in the C-indices of the XGBoost, DeepHit, and nomogram models (0.849 and 0.768, 0.811 and 0.767, 0.730 and 0.705). The training and validation sets had larger AUCs in the XGBoost and DeepHit models than the nomogram model in predicting OS (0.881 and 0.760, 0.845 and 0.776, and 0.764 and 0.729, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). IC presented survival benefits in the XGBoost-derived high-risk but not low-risk group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research used machine-learning algorithms to create and verify a comprehensive model integrating tumor burden with clinical variables to predict OS and determine which patients will most likely gain from IC. This model could be valuable for delivering patient counseling and conducting clinical evaluations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 295-305"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005423000674/pdfft?md5=31d4f451e44b32eec7053505ee4544ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005423000674-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive function of tumor burden-incorporated machine-learning algorithms for overall survival and their value in guiding management decisions in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Yang Liu ,&nbsp;Shiran Sun ,&nbsp;Ye Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Huang ,&nbsp;Kai Wang ,&nbsp;Yuan Qu ,&nbsp;Xuesong Chen ,&nbsp;Runye Wu ,&nbsp;Jianghu Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingwei Luo ,&nbsp;Yexiong Li ,&nbsp;Jingbo Wang ,&nbsp;Junlin Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Accurate prognostic predictions and personalized decision-making on induction chemotherapy (IC) for individuals with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) remain challenging. This research examined the predictive function of tumor burden-incorporated machine-learning algorithms for overall survival (OS) and their value in guiding treatment in patients with LA-NPC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Individuals with LA-NPC were reviewed retrospectively. Tumor burden signature-based OS prediction models were established using a nomogram and two machine-learning methods, the interpretable eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) risk prediction model, and DeepHit time-to-event neural network. The models' prediction performances were compared using the concordance index (C-index) and the area under the curve (AUC). The patients were divided into two cohorts based on the risk predictions of the most successful model. The efficacy of IC combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was compared to that of chemoradiotherapy alone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 1 221 eligible individuals, assigned to the training (<em>n</em> = 813) or validation (<em>n</em> = 408) set, showed significant respective differences in the C-indices of the XGBoost, DeepHit, and nomogram models (0.849 and 0.768, 0.811 and 0.767, 0.730 and 0.705). The training and validation sets had larger AUCs in the XGBoost and DeepHit models than the nomogram model in predicting OS (0.881 and 0.760, 0.845 and 0.776, and 0.764 and 0.729, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). IC presented survival benefits in the XGBoost-derived high-risk but not low-risk group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research used machine-learning algorithms to create and verify a comprehensive model integrating tumor burden with clinical variables to predict OS and determine which patients will most likely gain from IC. This model could be valuable for delivering patient counseling and conducting clinical evaluations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 295-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005423000674/pdfft?md5=31d4f451e44b32eec7053505ee4544ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005423000674-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005423000674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005423000674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对局部晚期鼻咽癌(LA-NPC)患者进行诱导化疗(IC)的准确预后预测和个性化决策仍然具有挑战性。本研究考察了肿瘤负荷结合机器学习算法对总生存期(OS)的预测功能及其在指导LA-NPC患者治疗中的价值。方法对LA-NPC患者进行回顾性分析。基于肿瘤负荷特征的OS预测模型采用nomogram和两种机器学习方法,可解释的eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)风险预测模型和DeepHit time-to-event神经网络建立。采用一致性指数(C-index)和曲线下面积(AUC)对模型的预测性能进行比较。根据最成功模型的风险预测,将患者分为两组。比较IC联合同步放化疗与单独放化疗的疗效。结果训练组(n = 813)和验证组(n = 408)的1 221名符合条件的个体,XGBoost、DeepHit和nomogram模型的c指数分别为0.849和0.768、0.811和0.767、0.730和0.705,差异具有统计学意义。XGBoost和DeepHit模型的训练集和验证集在预测OS方面的auc均大于nomogram模型(0.881和0.760,0.845和0.776,0.764和0.729),P <0.001)。在xgboost衍生的高风险而非低风险组中,IC表现出生存获益。本研究使用机器学习算法创建并验证了一个综合模型,该模型将肿瘤负担与临床变量相结合,以预测OS,并确定哪些患者最有可能从IC中获益。该模型对于提供患者咨询和进行临床评估具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive function of tumor burden-incorporated machine-learning algorithms for overall survival and their value in guiding management decisions in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Objective

Accurate prognostic predictions and personalized decision-making on induction chemotherapy (IC) for individuals with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) remain challenging. This research examined the predictive function of tumor burden-incorporated machine-learning algorithms for overall survival (OS) and their value in guiding treatment in patients with LA-NPC.

Methods

Individuals with LA-NPC were reviewed retrospectively. Tumor burden signature-based OS prediction models were established using a nomogram and two machine-learning methods, the interpretable eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) risk prediction model, and DeepHit time-to-event neural network. The models' prediction performances were compared using the concordance index (C-index) and the area under the curve (AUC). The patients were divided into two cohorts based on the risk predictions of the most successful model. The efficacy of IC combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was compared to that of chemoradiotherapy alone.

Results

The 1 221 eligible individuals, assigned to the training (n = 813) or validation (n = 408) set, showed significant respective differences in the C-indices of the XGBoost, DeepHit, and nomogram models (0.849 and 0.768, 0.811 and 0.767, 0.730 and 0.705). The training and validation sets had larger AUCs in the XGBoost and DeepHit models than the nomogram model in predicting OS (0.881 and 0.760, 0.845 and 0.776, and 0.764 and 0.729, P < 0.001). IC presented survival benefits in the XGBoost-derived high-risk but not low-risk group.

Conclusion

This research used machine-learning algorithms to create and verify a comprehensive model integrating tumor burden with clinical variables to predict OS and determine which patients will most likely gain from IC. This model could be valuable for delivering patient counseling and conducting clinical evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信