感谢上帝和感谢他人的书信在语言和主题上的差异

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Adam S. Hodge, Heidi M. Ellis, Sabrina Zuniga, Hansong Zhang, Cameron W. Davis, Aaron T. McLaughlin, Joshua N. Hook, Don E. Davis, Daryl R. Van Tongeren
{"title":"感谢上帝和感谢他人的书信在语言和主题上的差异","authors":"Adam S. Hodge, Heidi M. Ellis, Sabrina Zuniga, Hansong Zhang, Cameron W. Davis, Aaron T. McLaughlin, Joshua N. Hook, Don E. Davis, Daryl R. Van Tongeren","doi":"10.1080/17439760.2023.2265330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a dearth of empirical research distinguishing gratitude to God (GTG) from interhuman gratitude (IHG). This study explored linguistic (quantitative) and thematic (qualitative) differences in letters of GTG and letters of IHG. Participants (N = 326 undergraduate students) were randomly assigned to write (a) a letter of GTG, (b) a letter of IHG, or (c) a description of their daily morning routine. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 was used to examine linguistic differences and conventional content analysis was used to explore thematic differences. Few linguistic differences were observed between the gratitude-writing conditions, but both gratitude conditions reported more affective, cognitive, and past-focused time-oriented language compared to the control condition. Qualitative analyses revealed participants in the GTG condition identified a greater breadth and depth of benefits compared to the IHG condition, and there were unique differences pertaining to non-gratitude expressions. Limitations and areas for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Psychology","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linguistic and thematic differences in written letters of gratitude to God and gratitude toward others\",\"authors\":\"Adam S. Hodge, Heidi M. Ellis, Sabrina Zuniga, Hansong Zhang, Cameron W. Davis, Aaron T. McLaughlin, Joshua N. Hook, Don E. Davis, Daryl R. Van Tongeren\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17439760.2023.2265330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a dearth of empirical research distinguishing gratitude to God (GTG) from interhuman gratitude (IHG). This study explored linguistic (quantitative) and thematic (qualitative) differences in letters of GTG and letters of IHG. Participants (N = 326 undergraduate students) were randomly assigned to write (a) a letter of GTG, (b) a letter of IHG, or (c) a description of their daily morning routine. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 was used to examine linguistic differences and conventional content analysis was used to explore thematic differences. Few linguistic differences were observed between the gratitude-writing conditions, but both gratitude conditions reported more affective, cognitive, and past-focused time-oriented language compared to the control condition. Qualitative analyses revealed participants in the GTG condition identified a greater breadth and depth of benefits compared to the IHG condition, and there were unique differences pertaining to non-gratitude expressions. Limitations and areas for future research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Positive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Positive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2265330\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2265330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对上帝感恩(GTG)和人与人之间感恩(IHG)的实证研究比较缺乏。本研究探讨了GTG和IHG信函在语言(定量)和主题(定性)上的差异。参与者(N = 326名本科生)被随机分配写(a)一封GTG的信,(b)一封IHG的信,或(c)描述他们每天早上的例行公事。使用2015年语言调查和字数统计来检查语言差异,使用常规内容分析来探索主题差异。在表达感激的条件下,语言差异很小,但与控制条件相比,这两种条件都报告了更多的情感、认知和过去关注的时间导向语言。定性分析显示,与IHG组相比,GTG组的参与者识别出了更大的广度和深度的利益,并且在非感激表达方面存在独特的差异。讨论了局限性和未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linguistic and thematic differences in written letters of gratitude to God and gratitude toward others
There is a dearth of empirical research distinguishing gratitude to God (GTG) from interhuman gratitude (IHG). This study explored linguistic (quantitative) and thematic (qualitative) differences in letters of GTG and letters of IHG. Participants (N = 326 undergraduate students) were randomly assigned to write (a) a letter of GTG, (b) a letter of IHG, or (c) a description of their daily morning routine. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 was used to examine linguistic differences and conventional content analysis was used to explore thematic differences. Few linguistic differences were observed between the gratitude-writing conditions, but both gratitude conditions reported more affective, cognitive, and past-focused time-oriented language compared to the control condition. Qualitative analyses revealed participants in the GTG condition identified a greater breadth and depth of benefits compared to the IHG condition, and there were unique differences pertaining to non-gratitude expressions. Limitations and areas for future research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Positive Psychology
Journal of Positive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Positive psychology is about scientifically informed perspectives on what makes life worth living. It focuses on aspects of the human condition that lead to happiness, fulfillment, and flourishing. The Journal of Positive Psychology provides an interdisciplinary and international forum for the science and application of positive psychology. The Journal is devoted to basic research and professional application on states of optimal human functioning and fulfillment, and the facilitation and promotion of well-being. The Journal brings together leading work in positive psychology undertaken by researchers across different subdisciplines within psychology (e.g., social, personality, clinical, developmental, health, organizational), as well as across other social and behavioral disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信