{"title":"测量奥地利学生在高中阶段的程序知识","authors":"Christoph Ableitinger, Christian Dorner","doi":"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2209093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of complaints university lecturers make about a lack of knowledge, especially first-year students’ procedural knowledge, has increased recently. Due to missing adequate empirical evidence, a survey of procedural knowledge among students of Austrian high schools in their final year was conducted. For this purpose, test items for procedural knowledge were created, validated and processed by a total of 455 students without technology and formula booklets. The test items were based on a theoretical model with the dimensions number of procedural steps, curricular grade level, content area and rating of importance. Linear models were used to describe the dependencies between the students’ success rate and these dimensions. The results show that the level of procedural knowledge among the students is relatively low overall. A closer look reveals that tasks at lower secondary level have a significantly higher students’ success rate than tasks at upper secondary level. Furthermore, there is a positive correlation between the students’ success rate of a task and the experts’ assessment of whether this task should be able to be solved by students without technological aids. Interestingly, the dimensions number of procedural steps and content area have no significant impact on the students’ success rate.","PeriodicalId":14026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Austrian students’ procedural knowledge at the end of upper secondary level\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Ableitinger, Christian Dorner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2209093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The number of complaints university lecturers make about a lack of knowledge, especially first-year students’ procedural knowledge, has increased recently. Due to missing adequate empirical evidence, a survey of procedural knowledge among students of Austrian high schools in their final year was conducted. For this purpose, test items for procedural knowledge were created, validated and processed by a total of 455 students without technology and formula booklets. The test items were based on a theoretical model with the dimensions number of procedural steps, curricular grade level, content area and rating of importance. Linear models were used to describe the dependencies between the students’ success rate and these dimensions. The results show that the level of procedural knowledge among the students is relatively low overall. A closer look reveals that tasks at lower secondary level have a significantly higher students’ success rate than tasks at upper secondary level. Furthermore, there is a positive correlation between the students’ success rate of a task and the experts’ assessment of whether this task should be able to be solved by students without technological aids. Interestingly, the dimensions number of procedural steps and content area have no significant impact on the students’ success rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2209093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2209093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring Austrian students’ procedural knowledge at the end of upper secondary level
The number of complaints university lecturers make about a lack of knowledge, especially first-year students’ procedural knowledge, has increased recently. Due to missing adequate empirical evidence, a survey of procedural knowledge among students of Austrian high schools in their final year was conducted. For this purpose, test items for procedural knowledge were created, validated and processed by a total of 455 students without technology and formula booklets. The test items were based on a theoretical model with the dimensions number of procedural steps, curricular grade level, content area and rating of importance. Linear models were used to describe the dependencies between the students’ success rate and these dimensions. The results show that the level of procedural knowledge among the students is relatively low overall. A closer look reveals that tasks at lower secondary level have a significantly higher students’ success rate than tasks at upper secondary level. Furthermore, there is a positive correlation between the students’ success rate of a task and the experts’ assessment of whether this task should be able to be solved by students without technological aids. Interestingly, the dimensions number of procedural steps and content area have no significant impact on the students’ success rate.
期刊介绍:
Mathematics is pervading every study and technique in our modern world, bringing ever more sharply into focus the responsibilities laid upon those whose task it is to teach it. Most prominent among these is the difficulty of presenting an interdisciplinary approach so that one professional group may benefit from the experience of others. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology provides a medium by which a wide range of experience in mathematical education can be presented, assimilated and eventually adapted to everyday needs in schools, colleges, polytechnics, universities, industry and commerce. Contributions will be welcomed from lecturers, teachers and users of mathematics at all levels on the contents of syllabuses and methods of presentation.