DIY文化与全球南方

Andy Bennett, Devpriya Chakravarty
{"title":"DIY文化与全球南方","authors":"Andy Bennett, Devpriya Chakravarty","doi":"10.1177/27538702231211206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a core aspect of its mission, DIY, Alternative Cultures and Society is committed to featuring work from the growing community of scholars invested in studying DIY cultures in a global context. The concept of DIY, its history, and socio-political and cultural agendas are well documented in academic scholarship. The date, however, most of the work published on DIY cultural production and consumption has been written by Global North scholars and focuses in large part on Global North contexts and examples. Undoubtedly, the succession of radical movements that have arisen across the Global North during the 20th and early 21st centuries merit close scrutiny and analysis. Such movements, from Dadaism in the 1920s (Elgar and Grosenick, 2004) and situationism (1957 – 1972) (Wark, 2011) to the late 1960s counter-culture (Clecak, 1983) and (anarcho) punk (Cross, 2010; Hebdige, 1979) from the late 1970s onwards have each in their own ways forged counter-hegemonic narratives using such mediums as art, music fashion and literature. Alongside these spectacular examples of DIY cultural production and consumption, are more mundane yet equally pertinent examples including dumpster diving (Eikenberry and Smith, 2005) and craftivism (Greer, 2014), practices that have acquired increasing gravitas in a post-industrial era characterised by mounting austerity and precarity (Standing, 2011). And yet, while such work has done much to illustrate and illuminate the attempts of groups and individuals to engage with and counter harsh and worsening socio-economic and political conditions in the industrialised world, it tells us very little about the rest of the world; those countries that remain on the global periphery in regions that are collectively termed the Global South (Dargin, 2013). Neither the Global North nor the Global South are exclusively geographic terms, as illustrated in the case of Australia and New Zealand, countries that are geographically situated in the southern hemisphere, and within the primarily Global South continent of Oceania, but are industrially advanced nations. By","PeriodicalId":491210,"journal":{"name":"DIY Alternative Cultures & Society","volume":"63 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIY Cultures and the Global South\",\"authors\":\"Andy Bennett, Devpriya Chakravarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27538702231211206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a core aspect of its mission, DIY, Alternative Cultures and Society is committed to featuring work from the growing community of scholars invested in studying DIY cultures in a global context. The concept of DIY, its history, and socio-political and cultural agendas are well documented in academic scholarship. The date, however, most of the work published on DIY cultural production and consumption has been written by Global North scholars and focuses in large part on Global North contexts and examples. Undoubtedly, the succession of radical movements that have arisen across the Global North during the 20th and early 21st centuries merit close scrutiny and analysis. Such movements, from Dadaism in the 1920s (Elgar and Grosenick, 2004) and situationism (1957 – 1972) (Wark, 2011) to the late 1960s counter-culture (Clecak, 1983) and (anarcho) punk (Cross, 2010; Hebdige, 1979) from the late 1970s onwards have each in their own ways forged counter-hegemonic narratives using such mediums as art, music fashion and literature. Alongside these spectacular examples of DIY cultural production and consumption, are more mundane yet equally pertinent examples including dumpster diving (Eikenberry and Smith, 2005) and craftivism (Greer, 2014), practices that have acquired increasing gravitas in a post-industrial era characterised by mounting austerity and precarity (Standing, 2011). And yet, while such work has done much to illustrate and illuminate the attempts of groups and individuals to engage with and counter harsh and worsening socio-economic and political conditions in the industrialised world, it tells us very little about the rest of the world; those countries that remain on the global periphery in regions that are collectively termed the Global South (Dargin, 2013). Neither the Global North nor the Global South are exclusively geographic terms, as illustrated in the case of Australia and New Zealand, countries that are geographically situated in the southern hemisphere, and within the primarily Global South continent of Oceania, but are industrially advanced nations. By\",\"PeriodicalId\":491210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIY Alternative Cultures & Society\",\"volume\":\"63 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIY Alternative Cultures & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27538702231211206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIY Alternative Cultures & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27538702231211206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DIY Cultures and the Global South
As a core aspect of its mission, DIY, Alternative Cultures and Society is committed to featuring work from the growing community of scholars invested in studying DIY cultures in a global context. The concept of DIY, its history, and socio-political and cultural agendas are well documented in academic scholarship. The date, however, most of the work published on DIY cultural production and consumption has been written by Global North scholars and focuses in large part on Global North contexts and examples. Undoubtedly, the succession of radical movements that have arisen across the Global North during the 20th and early 21st centuries merit close scrutiny and analysis. Such movements, from Dadaism in the 1920s (Elgar and Grosenick, 2004) and situationism (1957 – 1972) (Wark, 2011) to the late 1960s counter-culture (Clecak, 1983) and (anarcho) punk (Cross, 2010; Hebdige, 1979) from the late 1970s onwards have each in their own ways forged counter-hegemonic narratives using such mediums as art, music fashion and literature. Alongside these spectacular examples of DIY cultural production and consumption, are more mundane yet equally pertinent examples including dumpster diving (Eikenberry and Smith, 2005) and craftivism (Greer, 2014), practices that have acquired increasing gravitas in a post-industrial era characterised by mounting austerity and precarity (Standing, 2011). And yet, while such work has done much to illustrate and illuminate the attempts of groups and individuals to engage with and counter harsh and worsening socio-economic and political conditions in the industrialised world, it tells us very little about the rest of the world; those countries that remain on the global periphery in regions that are collectively termed the Global South (Dargin, 2013). Neither the Global North nor the Global South are exclusively geographic terms, as illustrated in the case of Australia and New Zealand, countries that are geographically situated in the southern hemisphere, and within the primarily Global South continent of Oceania, but are industrially advanced nations. By
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信