流体吸引力和流体特性对压力、焦虑和抑郁的影响

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Elisabeth Counselman Carpenter, Kevin Lally, Alex Redcay, Wade Luquet
{"title":"流体吸引力和流体特性对压力、焦虑和抑郁的影响","authors":"Elisabeth Counselman Carpenter, Kevin Lally, Alex Redcay, Wade Luquet","doi":"10.1080/19359705.2023.2265314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIntroduction This study sought to determine whether gender, fluid identity, and fluid attraction groups differed significantly in stress, depression, and anxiety among LGBTQA + sexual minorities compared to non–sexual minorities.Methods Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), this study conducted two-way analyses of variance to determine whether male or female sexual minorities had significantly different levels of stress, depression, and anxiety when compared to non–sexual minorities. Individuals were also placed in one of eight groups based on sexual orientation, fluid identity, and fluid attraction to determine whether fluidity played a unique role in contributing to mental health.Results Results showed that both gender and fluidity accounted for 3.7% to 9.7% of the variance in stress (R2 = 4.1%), depression (R2 = 3.7%), and anxiety (R2 = 9.7%). Non–sexual minorities who reported both fluid attraction and fluid identity also reported the highest rate of stress, anxiety, and depression, revealing that fluidity had a unique impact on mental health apart from sexual orientation. This consistent pattern did not occur among sexual minorities. Sexual minorities had varying degrees of stress, depression, and anxiety, depending on the combination of static or fluid attraction or identity.Conclusion Fluid attraction, fluid identity, and gender significantly impacted stress, depression, and anxiety regardless of sexual orientation.Keywords: LGBTQfluid identitystressanxietydepression Ethics statementRutgers University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Bloomsburg University IRB granted exempt IRB reviews for this study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data supporting these results were derived from the following resources in the public domain: https://addhealth.cpc.unc.edu/data/#public-use.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.","PeriodicalId":46675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","volume":"125 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of fluid attraction and fluid identity on stress, anxiety, and depression\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Counselman Carpenter, Kevin Lally, Alex Redcay, Wade Luquet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19359705.2023.2265314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractIntroduction This study sought to determine whether gender, fluid identity, and fluid attraction groups differed significantly in stress, depression, and anxiety among LGBTQA + sexual minorities compared to non–sexual minorities.Methods Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), this study conducted two-way analyses of variance to determine whether male or female sexual minorities had significantly different levels of stress, depression, and anxiety when compared to non–sexual minorities. Individuals were also placed in one of eight groups based on sexual orientation, fluid identity, and fluid attraction to determine whether fluidity played a unique role in contributing to mental health.Results Results showed that both gender and fluidity accounted for 3.7% to 9.7% of the variance in stress (R2 = 4.1%), depression (R2 = 3.7%), and anxiety (R2 = 9.7%). Non–sexual minorities who reported both fluid attraction and fluid identity also reported the highest rate of stress, anxiety, and depression, revealing that fluidity had a unique impact on mental health apart from sexual orientation. This consistent pattern did not occur among sexual minorities. Sexual minorities had varying degrees of stress, depression, and anxiety, depending on the combination of static or fluid attraction or identity.Conclusion Fluid attraction, fluid identity, and gender significantly impacted stress, depression, and anxiety regardless of sexual orientation.Keywords: LGBTQfluid identitystressanxietydepression Ethics statementRutgers University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Bloomsburg University IRB granted exempt IRB reviews for this study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data supporting these results were derived from the following resources in the public domain: https://addhealth.cpc.unc.edu/data/#public-use.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"125 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2023.2265314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2023.2265314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究旨在确定LGBTQA +性少数群体与非性少数群体相比,性别、流体认同和流体吸引群体在压力、抑郁和焦虑方面是否存在显著差异。方法利用国家青少年到成人健康纵向研究(Add Health),本研究进行了双向方差分析,以确定男性和女性性少数群体与非性少数群体相比是否具有显著不同的压力、抑郁和焦虑水平。研究人员还根据性取向、流体身份和流体吸引力将个体分为八组,以确定流动性是否在促进心理健康方面发挥了独特的作用。结果结果显示,性别和流动性分别占压力(R2 = 4.1%)、抑郁(R2 = 3.7%)和焦虑(R2 = 9.7%)方差的3.7% ~ 9.7%。报告流体吸引力和流体身份的非性少数群体也报告了最高的压力、焦虑和抑郁率,这表明流动性除了性取向外,对心理健康也有独特的影响。这种一致的模式在性少数群体中没有出现。性少数群体有不同程度的压力、抑郁和焦虑,这取决于静态或流动的吸引力或身份的组合。结论无论性取向如何,流体吸引、流体认同和性别对应激、抑郁和焦虑均有显著影响。关键词:lgbtq流体身份压力焦虑抑郁伦理声明罗格斯大学机构审查委员会(IRB)和布卢姆斯堡大学IRB对本研究给予豁免审查。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明支持这些结果的数据来自以下公共领域的资源:https://addhealth.cpc.unc.edu/data/#public-use.Additional informationfunding作者报告没有与本文所述工作相关的资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of fluid attraction and fluid identity on stress, anxiety, and depression
AbstractIntroduction This study sought to determine whether gender, fluid identity, and fluid attraction groups differed significantly in stress, depression, and anxiety among LGBTQA + sexual minorities compared to non–sexual minorities.Methods Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), this study conducted two-way analyses of variance to determine whether male or female sexual minorities had significantly different levels of stress, depression, and anxiety when compared to non–sexual minorities. Individuals were also placed in one of eight groups based on sexual orientation, fluid identity, and fluid attraction to determine whether fluidity played a unique role in contributing to mental health.Results Results showed that both gender and fluidity accounted for 3.7% to 9.7% of the variance in stress (R2 = 4.1%), depression (R2 = 3.7%), and anxiety (R2 = 9.7%). Non–sexual minorities who reported both fluid attraction and fluid identity also reported the highest rate of stress, anxiety, and depression, revealing that fluidity had a unique impact on mental health apart from sexual orientation. This consistent pattern did not occur among sexual minorities. Sexual minorities had varying degrees of stress, depression, and anxiety, depending on the combination of static or fluid attraction or identity.Conclusion Fluid attraction, fluid identity, and gender significantly impacted stress, depression, and anxiety regardless of sexual orientation.Keywords: LGBTQfluid identitystressanxietydepression Ethics statementRutgers University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Bloomsburg University IRB granted exempt IRB reviews for this study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data supporting these results were derived from the following resources in the public domain: https://addhealth.cpc.unc.edu/data/#public-use.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信