俄罗斯vs欧洲:纽约丹尼列夫斯基的版本。现代媒体解读的可能性

Sergey N. Ilchenko
{"title":"俄罗斯vs欧洲:纽约丹尼列夫斯基的版本。现代媒体解读的可能性","authors":"Sergey N. Ilchenko","doi":"10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-4-878-885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of N.Y. Danilevsky’s work “Russia and Europe” is analyzed, which presents a study of the relations of these two subjects of history and geopolitics. The context of the analysis is both the tradition of Russian philosophical thought and journalism, and the media practice of the media in our time. The relevance of this issue is obvious today due to the dramatic geopolitical circumstances caused by the confrontation between Russia and the collective West in possible spheres of international relations: from military and informational to cultural and media. We consider the ontology of such relations on the example of cultural content and comes to the conclusion about the possibility and importance of introducing the theoretical premises of the Russian philosopher into the practice of modern domestic media. In his opinion, the current producers of domestic on-screen TV content are missing activation opportunities, relying mainly on up-to-date information and not delving, with rare exceptions, into the historical prerequisites for the emergence of antagonism between Russia and the West, Russia and Ukraine. Meanwhile, as the domestic experience of using historical ideologies shows, their actualization in the dominant public discourse, such a factor can play a decisive role in correcting mass consciousness in the direction of greater stabilization on the basis of distinct self-identification of citizens, which is based on a patriotic idea.","PeriodicalId":34441,"journal":{"name":"Neofilologiia","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russia vs Europe: N.Y. Danilevsky’s version. Possibilities of modern media interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Sergey N. Ilchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-4-878-885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of N.Y. Danilevsky’s work “Russia and Europe” is analyzed, which presents a study of the relations of these two subjects of history and geopolitics. The context of the analysis is both the tradition of Russian philosophical thought and journalism, and the media practice of the media in our time. The relevance of this issue is obvious today due to the dramatic geopolitical circumstances caused by the confrontation between Russia and the collective West in possible spheres of international relations: from military and informational to cultural and media. We consider the ontology of such relations on the example of cultural content and comes to the conclusion about the possibility and importance of introducing the theoretical premises of the Russian philosopher into the practice of modern domestic media. In his opinion, the current producers of domestic on-screen TV content are missing activation opportunities, relying mainly on up-to-date information and not delving, with rare exceptions, into the historical prerequisites for the emergence of antagonism between Russia and the West, Russia and Ukraine. Meanwhile, as the domestic experience of using historical ideologies shows, their actualization in the dominant public discourse, such a factor can play a decisive role in correcting mass consciousness in the direction of greater stabilization on the basis of distinct self-identification of citizens, which is based on a patriotic idea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neofilologiia\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neofilologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-4-878-885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neofilologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-4-878-885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了丹尼列夫斯基的著作《俄罗斯与欧洲》的相关性,对这两个历史和地缘政治主题的关系进行了研究。分析的语境既是俄罗斯哲学思想和新闻学的传统,也是我们这个时代媒体的媒介实践。由于俄罗斯与集体西方在国际关系的可能领域(从军事和信息到文化和媒体)的对抗所造成的戏剧性地缘政治环境,这个问题的相关性在今天是显而易见的。我们以文化内容为例考察了这种关系的本体论,并得出了将俄罗斯哲学家的理论前提引入现代国内媒介实践的可能性和重要性的结论。在他看来,目前国内电视屏幕内容的生产者正在失去激活机会,主要依赖于最新的信息,而不是深入研究俄罗斯与西方、俄罗斯与乌克兰之间出现对抗的历史前提,只有极少数例外。同时,正如国内使用历史意识形态的经验所表明的那样,它们在主导的公共话语中的实现,这种因素可以在基于爱国思想的公民明确的自我认同的基础上,在纠正群众意识朝着更大稳定的方向发展方面发挥决定性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Russia vs Europe: N.Y. Danilevsky’s version. Possibilities of modern media interpretation
The relevance of N.Y. Danilevsky’s work “Russia and Europe” is analyzed, which presents a study of the relations of these two subjects of history and geopolitics. The context of the analysis is both the tradition of Russian philosophical thought and journalism, and the media practice of the media in our time. The relevance of this issue is obvious today due to the dramatic geopolitical circumstances caused by the confrontation between Russia and the collective West in possible spheres of international relations: from military and informational to cultural and media. We consider the ontology of such relations on the example of cultural content and comes to the conclusion about the possibility and importance of introducing the theoretical premises of the Russian philosopher into the practice of modern domestic media. In his opinion, the current producers of domestic on-screen TV content are missing activation opportunities, relying mainly on up-to-date information and not delving, with rare exceptions, into the historical prerequisites for the emergence of antagonism between Russia and the West, Russia and Ukraine. Meanwhile, as the domestic experience of using historical ideologies shows, their actualization in the dominant public discourse, such a factor can play a decisive role in correcting mass consciousness in the direction of greater stabilization on the basis of distinct self-identification of citizens, which is based on a patriotic idea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信