忏悔的工具:遗嘱在13世纪意大利忏悔经济中的作用

IF 1.2 1区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Ethan Leong Yee
{"title":"忏悔的工具:遗嘱在13世纪意大利忏悔经济中的作用","authors":"Ethan Leong Yee","doi":"10.1086/726066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the difficulty of working with testaments, they have been the subject of study for many years, providing a window into the economic, social, and spiritual life of local communities throughout medieval Christendom. The religious significance of testaments has also attracted some attention; however, few have put thirteenth-century testamentary practice in conversation with the complex theology of penance developing in that time. Claims that making a testament was an act of charity, an exchange of earthly for heavenly goods, or a guarantee of memorialization, while valid to a certain extent, do not take into account the nuances of the penitential system. Based on the writings of thirteenth-century canonists such as Raymond of Peñafort and theologians such as Thomas Aquinas, and wills from the Franciscan convent of Bologna, this article argues that testaments can be seen as penitential instruments, much like indulgences, creating a real change in the spiritual state of the testator. Testaments worked in the penitential realm through the mechanism of suffrages. Good works of satisfaction were believed to be transferable from one person to another through the intention of the actor. The testament uses money to facilitate this transaction, exchanging coins for substitutionary penance, which can be exchanged for time in purgatory. In this framework, the long lists of pious bequests to various religious houses not only reflect personal loyalties or spiritual preferences of testators but also individualized solutions to penitential problems. Thus, making a testament involved much lay agency, but a spiritually adept executor was also vital.","PeriodicalId":46875,"journal":{"name":"SPECULUM-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instruments of Penance: The Role of Testaments in the Penitential Economy of Thirteenth-Century Italy\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Leong Yee\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the difficulty of working with testaments, they have been the subject of study for many years, providing a window into the economic, social, and spiritual life of local communities throughout medieval Christendom. The religious significance of testaments has also attracted some attention; however, few have put thirteenth-century testamentary practice in conversation with the complex theology of penance developing in that time. Claims that making a testament was an act of charity, an exchange of earthly for heavenly goods, or a guarantee of memorialization, while valid to a certain extent, do not take into account the nuances of the penitential system. Based on the writings of thirteenth-century canonists such as Raymond of Peñafort and theologians such as Thomas Aquinas, and wills from the Franciscan convent of Bologna, this article argues that testaments can be seen as penitential instruments, much like indulgences, creating a real change in the spiritual state of the testator. Testaments worked in the penitential realm through the mechanism of suffrages. Good works of satisfaction were believed to be transferable from one person to another through the intention of the actor. The testament uses money to facilitate this transaction, exchanging coins for substitutionary penance, which can be exchanged for time in purgatory. In this framework, the long lists of pious bequests to various religious houses not only reflect personal loyalties or spiritual preferences of testators but also individualized solutions to penitential problems. Thus, making a testament involved much lay agency, but a spiritually adept executor was also vital.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPECULUM-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPECULUM-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726066\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPECULUM-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管研究遗嘱很困难,但它们多年来一直是研究的主题,为了解中世纪基督教世界当地社区的经济、社会和精神生活提供了一个窗口。遗嘱的宗教意义也引起了一些关注;然而,很少有人把13世纪的遗嘱实践与当时发展起来的复杂的忏悔神学联系起来。声称立遗嘱是一种慈善行为,一种用人间的物品交换天堂的物品,或一种纪念的保证,虽然在一定程度上是有效的,但没有考虑到忏悔制度的细微差别。基于13世纪的圣徒(如Peñafort的雷蒙德)和神学家(如托马斯·阿奎那)的著作,以及博洛尼亚方济会修道院的遗嘱,本文认为遗嘱可以被视为忏悔的工具,就像赎罪券一样,在遗嘱人的精神状态中创造了真正的变化。遗嘱通过投票机制在忏悔领域发挥作用。好的满意行为被认为可以通过行为人的意图从一个人转移到另一个人。遗嘱用金钱来促进这一交易,用硬币换取替代的忏悔,而赎罪可以换取炼狱中的时间。在这个框架下,各种宗教机构的虔诚遗赠清单不仅反映了遗嘱人的个人忠诚或精神偏好,而且还反映了对忏悔问题的个性化解决方案。因此,立遗嘱涉及很多外行的代理,但一个精神上熟练的执行人也是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instruments of Penance: The Role of Testaments in the Penitential Economy of Thirteenth-Century Italy
Despite the difficulty of working with testaments, they have been the subject of study for many years, providing a window into the economic, social, and spiritual life of local communities throughout medieval Christendom. The religious significance of testaments has also attracted some attention; however, few have put thirteenth-century testamentary practice in conversation with the complex theology of penance developing in that time. Claims that making a testament was an act of charity, an exchange of earthly for heavenly goods, or a guarantee of memorialization, while valid to a certain extent, do not take into account the nuances of the penitential system. Based on the writings of thirteenth-century canonists such as Raymond of Peñafort and theologians such as Thomas Aquinas, and wills from the Franciscan convent of Bologna, this article argues that testaments can be seen as penitential instruments, much like indulgences, creating a real change in the spiritual state of the testator. Testaments worked in the penitential realm through the mechanism of suffrages. Good works of satisfaction were believed to be transferable from one person to another through the intention of the actor. The testament uses money to facilitate this transaction, exchanging coins for substitutionary penance, which can be exchanged for time in purgatory. In this framework, the long lists of pious bequests to various religious houses not only reflect personal loyalties or spiritual preferences of testators but also individualized solutions to penitential problems. Thus, making a testament involved much lay agency, but a spiritually adept executor was also vital.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SPECULUM-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL STUDIES
SPECULUM-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL STUDIES MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
361
期刊介绍: Speculum, published quarterly since 1926, was the first scholarly journal in North America devoted exclusively to the Middle Ages. It is open to contributions in all fields studying the Middle Ages, a period ranging from 500 to 1500. The journal"s primary emphasis is on Western Europe, but Arabic, Byzantine, Hebrew, and Slavic studies are also included. Articles may be submitted on any medieval topic; all disciplines, methodologies, and approaches are welcome, with articles on interdisciplinary topics especially encouraged. The language of publication is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信