Kirby P. Mayer PT, PhD , Susan Silva PhD , Amanda Beaty PT , Anne Davenport PT , Melissa Minniti PT , Sara Uribe Dorn PT , Lane S. White PT , Valerie K. Sabol PhD, MBA , Amy M. Pastva PT, MA, PhD
{"title":"危重病人身体康复期间的年龄和活动能力水平与临床结果的关系","authors":"Kirby P. Mayer PT, PhD , Susan Silva PhD , Amanda Beaty PT , Anne Davenport PT , Melissa Minniti PT , Sara Uribe Dorn PT , Lane S. White PT , Valerie K. Sabol PhD, MBA , Amy M. Pastva PT, MA, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine whether age, mobility level, and change in mobility level across the first 3 physical rehabilitation sessions associate with clinical outcomes of patients who are critically ill.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective, observational cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU).</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Hospitalized adults (n = 132) who received 3 or more, consecutive rehabilitation sessions in the MICU.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><p>Sample included 132 patients with 60 (45%) classified as younger (18-59 years) and 72 (55%) as older (60+ years). The most common diagnosis was sepsis/septicemia (32.6%). Older relative to younger patients had a significantly slower rate of improvement in ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) scores across rehabilitation sessions (mean slope coefficient 0.3 vs 0.6 points, <em>P</em><.001), were less likely to be discharged to home (30.6% vs 55.0%, <em>P</em>=.005), and were more likely to die within 12 months (41.7% vs 25.0%, <em>P</em>=.046). Covariate-adjusted models indicated greater early improvement in IMS scores were associated with discharge home (<em>P</em>=.005). Longer time to first rehabilitation session, lower initial IMS scores, and slower improvement in IMS scores were associated with increased ICU days (all <em>P</em><.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Older age and not achieving the mobility milestone of sitting at edge of bed or limited progression of mobility across sessions is associated with poor patient outcomes. Our findings suggest that age and mobility level contribute to outcome prognostication, and can aide in clinical phenotyping and rehabilitative service allocation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000678/pdfft?md5=4ee695cd17194771a3475e0fae5bb07e&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000678-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship of Age And Mobility Levels During Physical Rehabilitation With Clinical Outcomes in Critical Illness\",\"authors\":\"Kirby P. Mayer PT, PhD , Susan Silva PhD , Amanda Beaty PT , Anne Davenport PT , Melissa Minniti PT , Sara Uribe Dorn PT , Lane S. White PT , Valerie K. Sabol PhD, MBA , Amy M. Pastva PT, MA, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine whether age, mobility level, and change in mobility level across the first 3 physical rehabilitation sessions associate with clinical outcomes of patients who are critically ill.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective, observational cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU).</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Hospitalized adults (n = 132) who received 3 or more, consecutive rehabilitation sessions in the MICU.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><p>Sample included 132 patients with 60 (45%) classified as younger (18-59 years) and 72 (55%) as older (60+ years). The most common diagnosis was sepsis/septicemia (32.6%). Older relative to younger patients had a significantly slower rate of improvement in ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) scores across rehabilitation sessions (mean slope coefficient 0.3 vs 0.6 points, <em>P</em><.001), were less likely to be discharged to home (30.6% vs 55.0%, <em>P</em>=.005), and were more likely to die within 12 months (41.7% vs 25.0%, <em>P</em>=.046). Covariate-adjusted models indicated greater early improvement in IMS scores were associated with discharge home (<em>P</em>=.005). Longer time to first rehabilitation session, lower initial IMS scores, and slower improvement in IMS scores were associated with increased ICU days (all <em>P</em><.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Older age and not achieving the mobility milestone of sitting at edge of bed or limited progression of mobility across sessions is associated with poor patient outcomes. Our findings suggest that age and mobility level contribute to outcome prognostication, and can aide in clinical phenotyping and rehabilitative service allocation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000678/pdfft?md5=4ee695cd17194771a3475e0fae5bb07e&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000678-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的确定重症患者的年龄、活动能力水平以及前 3 次物理康复治疗中活动能力水平的变化是否与临床预后有关。干预措施不适用。测量和主要结果样本包括 132 名患者,其中 60 人(45%)年龄较小(18-59 岁),72 人(55%)年龄较大(60 岁以上)。最常见的诊断是败血症/败血症(32.6%)。与年轻患者相比,老年患者在各康复疗程中的重症监护室移动量表(IMS)评分改善速度明显较慢(平均斜率系数为0.3分 vs 0.6分,P<.001),出院回家的可能性较低(30.6% vs 55.0%,P=.005),并且更有可能在12个月内死亡(41.7% vs 25.0%,P=.046)。协变量调整模型显示,IMS评分的早期改善幅度越大,出院回家的可能性越大(P=.005)。首次康复治疗时间较长、初始IMS评分较低以及IMS评分改善较慢与ICU天数增加有关(所有P< .03)。我们的研究结果表明,年龄和活动能力水平有助于预后,并有助于临床表型和康复服务的分配。
Relationship of Age And Mobility Levels During Physical Rehabilitation With Clinical Outcomes in Critical Illness
Objective
To determine whether age, mobility level, and change in mobility level across the first 3 physical rehabilitation sessions associate with clinical outcomes of patients who are critically ill.
Design
Retrospective, observational cohort study.
Setting
Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU).
Participants
Hospitalized adults (n = 132) who received 3 or more, consecutive rehabilitation sessions in the MICU.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Measurements and Main Results
Sample included 132 patients with 60 (45%) classified as younger (18-59 years) and 72 (55%) as older (60+ years). The most common diagnosis was sepsis/septicemia (32.6%). Older relative to younger patients had a significantly slower rate of improvement in ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) scores across rehabilitation sessions (mean slope coefficient 0.3 vs 0.6 points, P<.001), were less likely to be discharged to home (30.6% vs 55.0%, P=.005), and were more likely to die within 12 months (41.7% vs 25.0%, P=.046). Covariate-adjusted models indicated greater early improvement in IMS scores were associated with discharge home (P=.005). Longer time to first rehabilitation session, lower initial IMS scores, and slower improvement in IMS scores were associated with increased ICU days (all P<.03).
Conclusion
Older age and not achieving the mobility milestone of sitting at edge of bed or limited progression of mobility across sessions is associated with poor patient outcomes. Our findings suggest that age and mobility level contribute to outcome prognostication, and can aide in clinical phenotyping and rehabilitative service allocation.