用自动t形迷宫测试猪的空间工作记忆

L M Allen, D A Murphy, V Roldan, M N Moussa, A Draper, A Delgado, M Aguiar, M A Capote, T J J Jarome, K Lee, A T Mattfeld, R Prather, T A Allen
{"title":"用自动t形迷宫测试猪的空间工作记忆","authors":"L M Allen, D A Murphy, V Roldan, M N Moussa, A Draper, A Delgado, M Aguiar, M A Capote, T J J Jarome, K Lee, A T Mattfeld, R Prather, T A Allen","doi":"10.1093/oons/kvad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pigs are an important large animal model for translational clinical research but underutilized in behavioral neuroscience. This is due, in part, to a lack of rigorous neurocognitive assessments for pigs. Here, we developed a new automated T-maze for pigs that takes advantage of their natural tendency to alternate. The T-maze has obvious cross-species value having served as a foundation for cognitive theories across species. The maze (17’ x 13’) was constructed typically and automated with flanking corridors, guillotine doors, cameras, and reward dispensers. We ran nine pigs in (1) a simple alternation task and (2) a delayed spatial alternation task. Our assessment focused on the delayed spatial alternation task which forced pigs to wait for random delays (5, 60, 120, and 240sec) and burdened spatial working memory. We also looked at self-paced trial latencies, error types, and coordinate-based video tracking. We found pigs naturally alternated but performance declined steeply across delays (R2 = 0.84). Self-paced delays had no effect on performance suggestive of an active interference model of working memory. Positional and head direction data could differentiate subsequent turns on short but not long delays. Performance levels were stable over weeks in diverse strains and sexes, and thus provide a benchmark for future neurocognitive assessments in pigs.","PeriodicalId":74386,"journal":{"name":"Oxford open neuroscience","volume":"308 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Spatial Working Memory in Pigs using an Automated T-Maze\",\"authors\":\"L M Allen, D A Murphy, V Roldan, M N Moussa, A Draper, A Delgado, M Aguiar, M A Capote, T J J Jarome, K Lee, A T Mattfeld, R Prather, T A Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oons/kvad010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Pigs are an important large animal model for translational clinical research but underutilized in behavioral neuroscience. This is due, in part, to a lack of rigorous neurocognitive assessments for pigs. Here, we developed a new automated T-maze for pigs that takes advantage of their natural tendency to alternate. The T-maze has obvious cross-species value having served as a foundation for cognitive theories across species. The maze (17’ x 13’) was constructed typically and automated with flanking corridors, guillotine doors, cameras, and reward dispensers. We ran nine pigs in (1) a simple alternation task and (2) a delayed spatial alternation task. Our assessment focused on the delayed spatial alternation task which forced pigs to wait for random delays (5, 60, 120, and 240sec) and burdened spatial working memory. We also looked at self-paced trial latencies, error types, and coordinate-based video tracking. We found pigs naturally alternated but performance declined steeply across delays (R2 = 0.84). Self-paced delays had no effect on performance suggestive of an active interference model of working memory. Positional and head direction data could differentiate subsequent turns on short but not long delays. Performance levels were stable over weeks in diverse strains and sexes, and thus provide a benchmark for future neurocognitive assessments in pigs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford open neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"308 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford open neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oons/kvad010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford open neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oons/kvad010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要猪是临床转化研究中重要的大型动物模型,但在行为神经科学研究中未得到充分利用。这在一定程度上是由于对猪缺乏严格的神经认知评估。在这里,我们为猪开发了一种新的自动t型迷宫,利用它们自然的交替倾向。t型迷宫作为跨物种认知理论的基础,具有明显的跨物种价值。迷宫(17英尺× 13英尺)是典型的、自动化的,两侧有走廊、断头台门、摄像头和奖励分配器。我们在(1)一个简单的交替任务和(2)一个延迟的空间交替任务中运行了9只猪。我们的研究重点是延迟空间交替任务,该任务迫使猪等待随机延迟(5、60、120和240秒),并负担空间工作记忆。我们还研究了自定节奏的试用延迟、错误类型和基于坐标的视频跟踪。我们发现猪自然地交替,但性能在延迟期间急剧下降(R2 = 0.84)。自定节奏的延迟对工作记忆的表现没有影响,这表明工作记忆存在主动干扰模型。位置和头部方向数据可以区分短而非长延迟的后续转弯。在数周内,不同品系和性别的猪的表现水平稳定,因此为未来猪的神经认知评估提供了基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing Spatial Working Memory in Pigs using an Automated T-Maze
Abstract Pigs are an important large animal model for translational clinical research but underutilized in behavioral neuroscience. This is due, in part, to a lack of rigorous neurocognitive assessments for pigs. Here, we developed a new automated T-maze for pigs that takes advantage of their natural tendency to alternate. The T-maze has obvious cross-species value having served as a foundation for cognitive theories across species. The maze (17’ x 13’) was constructed typically and automated with flanking corridors, guillotine doors, cameras, and reward dispensers. We ran nine pigs in (1) a simple alternation task and (2) a delayed spatial alternation task. Our assessment focused on the delayed spatial alternation task which forced pigs to wait for random delays (5, 60, 120, and 240sec) and burdened spatial working memory. We also looked at self-paced trial latencies, error types, and coordinate-based video tracking. We found pigs naturally alternated but performance declined steeply across delays (R2 = 0.84). Self-paced delays had no effect on performance suggestive of an active interference model of working memory. Positional and head direction data could differentiate subsequent turns on short but not long delays. Performance levels were stable over weeks in diverse strains and sexes, and thus provide a benchmark for future neurocognitive assessments in pigs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信