利用卷积神经网络从光谱图像中分辨浮游植物色素

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 LIMNOLOGY
Pauliina Salmi, Ilkka Pölönen, Daniel Atton Beckmann, Marco L. Calderini, Linda May, Justyna Olszewska, Laura Perozzi, Salli Pääkkönen, Sami Taipale, Peter Hunter
{"title":"利用卷积神经网络从光谱图像中分辨浮游植物色素","authors":"Pauliina Salmi,&nbsp;Ilkka Pölönen,&nbsp;Daniel Atton Beckmann,&nbsp;Marco L. Calderini,&nbsp;Linda May,&nbsp;Justyna Olszewska,&nbsp;Laura Perozzi,&nbsp;Salli Pääkkönen,&nbsp;Sami Taipale,&nbsp;Peter Hunter","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Motivated by the need for rapid and robust monitoring of phytoplankton in inland waters, this article introduces a protocol based on a mobile spectral imager for assessing phytoplankton pigments from water samples. The protocol includes (1) sample concentrating; (2) spectral imaging; and (3) convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to resolve concentrations of chlorophyll <i>a</i> (Chl <i>a</i>), carotenoids, and phycocyanin. The protocol was demonstrated with samples from 20 lakes across Scotland, with special emphasis on Loch Leven where blooms of cyanobacteria are frequent. In parallel, samples were prepared for reference observations of Chl <i>a</i> and carotenoids by high-performance liquid chromatography and of phycocyanin by spectrophotometry. Robustness of the CNNs were investigated by excluding each lake from model trainings one at a time and using the excluded data as independent test data. For Loch Leven, median absolute percentage difference (MAPD) was 15% for Chl <i>a</i> and 36% for carotenoids. MAPD in estimated phycocyanin concentration was high (102%); however, the system was able to indicate the possibility of a cyanobacteria bloom. In the leave-one-out tests with the other lakes, MAPD was 26% for Chl <i>a</i>, 27% for carotenoids, and 75% for phycocyanin. The higher error for phycocyanin was likely due to variation in the data distribution and reference observations. It was concluded that this protocol could support phytoplankton monitoring by using Chl <i>a</i> and carotenoids as proxies for biomass. Greater focus on the distribution and volume of the training data would improve the phycocyanin estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10588","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolving phytoplankton pigments from spectral images using convolutional neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Pauliina Salmi,&nbsp;Ilkka Pölönen,&nbsp;Daniel Atton Beckmann,&nbsp;Marco L. Calderini,&nbsp;Linda May,&nbsp;Justyna Olszewska,&nbsp;Laura Perozzi,&nbsp;Salli Pääkkönen,&nbsp;Sami Taipale,&nbsp;Peter Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lom3.10588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Motivated by the need for rapid and robust monitoring of phytoplankton in inland waters, this article introduces a protocol based on a mobile spectral imager for assessing phytoplankton pigments from water samples. The protocol includes (1) sample concentrating; (2) spectral imaging; and (3) convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to resolve concentrations of chlorophyll <i>a</i> (Chl <i>a</i>), carotenoids, and phycocyanin. The protocol was demonstrated with samples from 20 lakes across Scotland, with special emphasis on Loch Leven where blooms of cyanobacteria are frequent. In parallel, samples were prepared for reference observations of Chl <i>a</i> and carotenoids by high-performance liquid chromatography and of phycocyanin by spectrophotometry. Robustness of the CNNs were investigated by excluding each lake from model trainings one at a time and using the excluded data as independent test data. For Loch Leven, median absolute percentage difference (MAPD) was 15% for Chl <i>a</i> and 36% for carotenoids. MAPD in estimated phycocyanin concentration was high (102%); however, the system was able to indicate the possibility of a cyanobacteria bloom. In the leave-one-out tests with the other lakes, MAPD was 26% for Chl <i>a</i>, 27% for carotenoids, and 75% for phycocyanin. The higher error for phycocyanin was likely due to variation in the data distribution and reference observations. It was concluded that this protocol could support phytoplankton monitoring by using Chl <i>a</i> and carotenoids as proxies for biomass. Greater focus on the distribution and volume of the training data would improve the phycocyanin estimates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10588\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10588\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

出于对内陆水域浮游植物进行快速、稳健监测的需要,本文介绍了一种基于移动光谱成像仪的方案,用于评估水样中的浮游植物色素。该方案包括:(1)样品浓缩;(2)光谱成像;(3)卷积神经网络(CNN),以解析叶绿素 a(Chl a)、类胡萝卜素和藻蓝素的浓度。我们利用苏格兰 20 个湖泊的样本演示了这一方案,其中特别强调了蓝藻经常大量繁殖的莱文湖。同时,还制备了样品,以便通过高效液相色谱法对 Chl a 和类胡萝卜素进行参考观测,并通过分光光度法对藻类花青素进行参考观测。通过每次将每个湖泊排除在模型训练之外,并将排除的数据作为独立的测试数据,对 CNN 的鲁棒性进行了研究。对于莱文湖,叶绿素 a 和类胡萝卜素的绝对百分比差异中值(MAPD)分别为 15%和 36%。估算的藻蓝蛋白浓度的中位绝对百分比差值较高(102%),但该系统仍能显示蓝藻藻华的可能 性。在对其他湖泊进行的剔除测试中,Chl a 的 MAPD 为 26%,类胡萝卜素的 MAPD 为 27%,藻蓝蛋白的 MAPD 为 75%。藻蓝蛋白的误差较大可能是由于数据分布和参考观测值的变化造成的。结论是,通过使用 Chl a 和类胡萝卜素作为生物量的替代物,该方案可支持浮游植物监测。对训练数据的分布和数量给予更多关注将改进藻蓝蛋白的估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Resolving phytoplankton pigments from spectral images using convolutional neural networks

Resolving phytoplankton pigments from spectral images using convolutional neural networks

Motivated by the need for rapid and robust monitoring of phytoplankton in inland waters, this article introduces a protocol based on a mobile spectral imager for assessing phytoplankton pigments from water samples. The protocol includes (1) sample concentrating; (2) spectral imaging; and (3) convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to resolve concentrations of chlorophyll a (Chl a), carotenoids, and phycocyanin. The protocol was demonstrated with samples from 20 lakes across Scotland, with special emphasis on Loch Leven where blooms of cyanobacteria are frequent. In parallel, samples were prepared for reference observations of Chl a and carotenoids by high-performance liquid chromatography and of phycocyanin by spectrophotometry. Robustness of the CNNs were investigated by excluding each lake from model trainings one at a time and using the excluded data as independent test data. For Loch Leven, median absolute percentage difference (MAPD) was 15% for Chl a and 36% for carotenoids. MAPD in estimated phycocyanin concentration was high (102%); however, the system was able to indicate the possibility of a cyanobacteria bloom. In the leave-one-out tests with the other lakes, MAPD was 26% for Chl a, 27% for carotenoids, and 75% for phycocyanin. The higher error for phycocyanin was likely due to variation in the data distribution and reference observations. It was concluded that this protocol could support phytoplankton monitoring by using Chl a and carotenoids as proxies for biomass. Greater focus on the distribution and volume of the training data would improve the phycocyanin estimates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信