圣保罗州(巴西)生态财政转移:分配和环境影响

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Kaline de Mello , Paulo André Tavares , Helena de Queiroz Carrascosa Von Glehn , Marco Aurélio Nalon , Gerd Sparovek
{"title":"<s:1>圣保罗州(巴西)生态财政转移:分配和环境影响","authors":"Kaline de Mello ,&nbsp;Paulo André Tavares ,&nbsp;Helena de Queiroz Carrascosa Von Glehn ,&nbsp;Marco Aurélio Nalon ,&nbsp;Gerd Sparovek","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To restore 12 million hectares of native vegetation in Brazil by 2030, aligning environmental policies with incentive measures is crucial. The Ecological Fiscal Transfer (known as Ecological ICMS in Brazil) allows states to redistribute the ICMS tax (similar to the Value Added Tax) revenue based on environmental criteria, likely motivating municipalities to take environmental action. São Paulo recently modified its ecological ICMS legislation, increasing the ICMS revenue distributed according to environmental criteria and introducing a new criterion for native vegetation cover. We assessed the impact of these changes on tax redistribution, considering three scenarios: the former rules (2021), the new rules (2025), and the new rules with 1.5 million hectares of vegetation restored (2042). While the pattern of ICMS distribution remained mostly unchanged, there were distributional effects. Some municipalities lost up to 5% of their initial revenue, while others with high socio-environmental importance doubled their revenues. Existing environmental criteria still lack incentives for local environmental policies. However, the new criterion for native vegetation cover could, with practical limitations, boost municipal revenue after restoring 1.5 million hectares. São Paulo's initiative to incorporate native vegetation cover into an Ecological Fiscal Transfer policy holds the potential to inspire similar tax-based environmental incentives worldwide. However, it must be adapted to motivate local governments to embrace restoration actions rather than serving primarily as a compensatory measure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"21 4","pages":"Pages 318-325"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000731/pdfft?md5=22988fd342dc36b7dde20f332c592a28&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064423000731-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The São Paulo State (Brazil) Ecological Fiscal Transfer: Distributive and environmental effects\",\"authors\":\"Kaline de Mello ,&nbsp;Paulo André Tavares ,&nbsp;Helena de Queiroz Carrascosa Von Glehn ,&nbsp;Marco Aurélio Nalon ,&nbsp;Gerd Sparovek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecon.2023.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To restore 12 million hectares of native vegetation in Brazil by 2030, aligning environmental policies with incentive measures is crucial. The Ecological Fiscal Transfer (known as Ecological ICMS in Brazil) allows states to redistribute the ICMS tax (similar to the Value Added Tax) revenue based on environmental criteria, likely motivating municipalities to take environmental action. São Paulo recently modified its ecological ICMS legislation, increasing the ICMS revenue distributed according to environmental criteria and introducing a new criterion for native vegetation cover. We assessed the impact of these changes on tax redistribution, considering three scenarios: the former rules (2021), the new rules (2025), and the new rules with 1.5 million hectares of vegetation restored (2042). While the pattern of ICMS distribution remained mostly unchanged, there were distributional effects. Some municipalities lost up to 5% of their initial revenue, while others with high socio-environmental importance doubled their revenues. Existing environmental criteria still lack incentives for local environmental policies. However, the new criterion for native vegetation cover could, with practical limitations, boost municipal revenue after restoring 1.5 million hectares. São Paulo's initiative to incorporate native vegetation cover into an Ecological Fiscal Transfer policy holds the potential to inspire similar tax-based environmental incentives worldwide. However, it must be adapted to motivate local governments to embrace restoration actions rather than serving primarily as a compensatory measure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 318-325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000731/pdfft?md5=22988fd342dc36b7dde20f332c592a28&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064423000731-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000731\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了在2030年前恢复巴西1200万公顷的原生植被,将环境政策与激励措施相结合至关重要。生态财政转移(在巴西被称为生态ICMS)允许各州根据环境标准重新分配ICMS税(类似于增值税)收入,可能会激励市政当局采取环境行动。圣保罗最近修改了其生态ICMS立法,增加了根据环境标准分配的ICMS收入,并引入了一个新的原生植被覆盖标准。我们评估了这些变化对税收再分配的影响,考虑了三种情景:前规则(2021年)、新规则(2025年)和新规则(2042年),其中恢复了150万公顷的植被。虽然ICMS分布格局基本保持不变,但存在分布效应。一些城市的初始收入损失高达5%,而其他具有高度社会环境重要性的城市的收入翻了一番。现有的环境标准仍然缺乏激励地方环境政策的动力。然而,在恢复了150万公顷土地后,新的原生植被覆盖标准可能会增加市政收入,尽管存在实际限制。圣保罗将原生植被覆盖纳入生态财政转移政策的倡议有可能在全球范围内激发类似的基于税收的环境激励措施。然而,它必须加以调整,以激励地方政府采取恢复行动,而不是主要作为一种补偿措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The São Paulo State (Brazil) Ecological Fiscal Transfer: Distributive and environmental effects

The São Paulo State (Brazil) Ecological Fiscal Transfer: Distributive and environmental effects

To restore 12 million hectares of native vegetation in Brazil by 2030, aligning environmental policies with incentive measures is crucial. The Ecological Fiscal Transfer (known as Ecological ICMS in Brazil) allows states to redistribute the ICMS tax (similar to the Value Added Tax) revenue based on environmental criteria, likely motivating municipalities to take environmental action. São Paulo recently modified its ecological ICMS legislation, increasing the ICMS revenue distributed according to environmental criteria and introducing a new criterion for native vegetation cover. We assessed the impact of these changes on tax redistribution, considering three scenarios: the former rules (2021), the new rules (2025), and the new rules with 1.5 million hectares of vegetation restored (2042). While the pattern of ICMS distribution remained mostly unchanged, there were distributional effects. Some municipalities lost up to 5% of their initial revenue, while others with high socio-environmental importance doubled their revenues. Existing environmental criteria still lack incentives for local environmental policies. However, the new criterion for native vegetation cover could, with practical limitations, boost municipal revenue after restoring 1.5 million hectares. São Paulo's initiative to incorporate native vegetation cover into an Ecological Fiscal Transfer policy holds the potential to inspire similar tax-based environmental incentives worldwide. However, it must be adapted to motivate local governments to embrace restoration actions rather than serving primarily as a compensatory measure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信