谨慎的信念和反复的可采性

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Emiliano Catonini , Nicodemo De Vito
{"title":"谨慎的信念和反复的可采性","authors":"Emiliano Catonini ,&nbsp;Nicodemo De Vito","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>We define notions of cautiousness and cautious belief to provide epistemic conditions for iterated admissibility in finite games. We show that iterated admissibility characterizes the behavioral implications of “cautious rationality and common cautious belief in cautious rationality” in a terminal lexicographic type structure. For arbitrary type structures, the behavioral implications of these epistemic assumptions are characterized by the solution concept of self-admissible set (</span><span>Brandenburger et al., 2008</span>). We also show that analogous results hold under alternative epistemic assumptions, in particular if cautiousness is “transparent” to the players.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cautious belief and iterated admissibility\",\"authors\":\"Emiliano Catonini ,&nbsp;Nicodemo De Vito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>We define notions of cautiousness and cautious belief to provide epistemic conditions for iterated admissibility in finite games. We show that iterated admissibility characterizes the behavioral implications of “cautious rationality and common cautious belief in cautious rationality” in a terminal lexicographic type structure. For arbitrary type structures, the behavioral implications of these epistemic assumptions are characterized by the solution concept of self-admissible set (</span><span>Brandenburger et al., 2008</span>). We also show that analogous results hold under alternative epistemic assumptions, in particular if cautiousness is “transparent” to the players.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematical Economics\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102918\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406823001118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406823001118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们定义了谨慎性和谨慎信念的概念,为有限博弈中的迭代容许性提供了认识条件。我们发现,在一个终端词典型结构中,“谨慎理性和对谨慎理性的普遍谨慎信念”的行为蕴涵具有重复的可采性特征。对于任意类型结构,这些认知假设的行为含义以自容许集的解概念为特征(Brandenburger, Friedenberg和Keisler 2008)。我们还表明,在其他认知假设下,特别是如果谨慎性对参与者是“透明的”,类似的结果也成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cautious belief and iterated admissibility

We define notions of cautiousness and cautious belief to provide epistemic conditions for iterated admissibility in finite games. We show that iterated admissibility characterizes the behavioral implications of “cautious rationality and common cautious belief in cautious rationality” in a terminal lexicographic type structure. For arbitrary type structures, the behavioral implications of these epistemic assumptions are characterized by the solution concept of self-admissible set (Brandenburger et al., 2008). We also show that analogous results hold under alternative epistemic assumptions, in particular if cautiousness is “transparent” to the players.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Economics
Journal of Mathematical Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary objective of the Journal is to provide a forum for work in economic theory which expresses economic ideas using formal mathematical reasoning. For work to add to this primary objective, it is not sufficient that the mathematical reasoning be new and correct. The work must have real economic content. The economic ideas must be interesting and important. These ideas may pertain to any field of economics or any school of economic thought.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信