Abdullah Al Noman , Onusree Sarkar , Tanzia Mohsin Mita , Khadiza Siddika , Fahmida Afrose
{"title":"用通俗易懂的语言为各方面的学习者简化证据等级的概念:简要回顾","authors":"Abdullah Al Noman , Onusree Sarkar , Tanzia Mohsin Mita , Khadiza Siddika , Fahmida Afrose","doi":"10.1016/j.ipha.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The level of evidence is a fundamental structure for assessing the excellence of evidence while making healthcare choices. It assesses medical research according to its structure, credibility, and relevance. The different degrees of proof are frequently represented as a triangle shape, with the most powerful proof on the highest point. The pyramid is divided into two primary parts: refined data (systematic reviews, meta-analyses) that combines information from multiple studies, and raw data (randomized trials, cohort studies, case series) that consists of original research. Systematic evaluations condense results from various investigations on a subject using thorough, replicable approaches. Meta-analyses mathematically integrate information from similar research studies. Case studies provide information about a specific patient. Case-control studies examine the occurrences in separate groups of people who have a particular illness and those who do not. Randomly assigned intervention and control groups are compared in randomized controlled experiments to observe the differences in their outcomes. Cohort studies track groups over a period to investigate connections between factors and results. The upper levels of the pyramid are typically seen as more trustworthy proof because of thorough combination or research structure. However, every level provides valuable information. Recognizing the positive aspects of various research methods enables individuals to assess the credibility of information when making choices related to healthcare.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100682,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Pharmacy","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 270-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949866X23001168/pdfft?md5=189b562cabffc4f128b5711680581493&pid=1-s2.0-S2949866X23001168-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplifying the concept of level of evidence in lay language for all aspects of learners: In brief review\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Al Noman , Onusree Sarkar , Tanzia Mohsin Mita , Khadiza Siddika , Fahmida Afrose\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipha.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The level of evidence is a fundamental structure for assessing the excellence of evidence while making healthcare choices. It assesses medical research according to its structure, credibility, and relevance. The different degrees of proof are frequently represented as a triangle shape, with the most powerful proof on the highest point. The pyramid is divided into two primary parts: refined data (systematic reviews, meta-analyses) that combines information from multiple studies, and raw data (randomized trials, cohort studies, case series) that consists of original research. Systematic evaluations condense results from various investigations on a subject using thorough, replicable approaches. Meta-analyses mathematically integrate information from similar research studies. Case studies provide information about a specific patient. Case-control studies examine the occurrences in separate groups of people who have a particular illness and those who do not. Randomly assigned intervention and control groups are compared in randomized controlled experiments to observe the differences in their outcomes. Cohort studies track groups over a period to investigate connections between factors and results. The upper levels of the pyramid are typically seen as more trustworthy proof because of thorough combination or research structure. However, every level provides valuable information. Recognizing the positive aspects of various research methods enables individuals to assess the credibility of information when making choices related to healthcare.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligent Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 270-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949866X23001168/pdfft?md5=189b562cabffc4f128b5711680581493&pid=1-s2.0-S2949866X23001168-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligent Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949866X23001168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949866X23001168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simplifying the concept of level of evidence in lay language for all aspects of learners: In brief review
The level of evidence is a fundamental structure for assessing the excellence of evidence while making healthcare choices. It assesses medical research according to its structure, credibility, and relevance. The different degrees of proof are frequently represented as a triangle shape, with the most powerful proof on the highest point. The pyramid is divided into two primary parts: refined data (systematic reviews, meta-analyses) that combines information from multiple studies, and raw data (randomized trials, cohort studies, case series) that consists of original research. Systematic evaluations condense results from various investigations on a subject using thorough, replicable approaches. Meta-analyses mathematically integrate information from similar research studies. Case studies provide information about a specific patient. Case-control studies examine the occurrences in separate groups of people who have a particular illness and those who do not. Randomly assigned intervention and control groups are compared in randomized controlled experiments to observe the differences in their outcomes. Cohort studies track groups over a period to investigate connections between factors and results. The upper levels of the pyramid are typically seen as more trustworthy proof because of thorough combination or research structure. However, every level provides valuable information. Recognizing the positive aspects of various research methods enables individuals to assess the credibility of information when making choices related to healthcare.