{"title":"病理T2和/或N+尿路上皮癌患者对新辅助化疗的反应与根治性手术后生存结果的关系","authors":"","doi":"10.18053/jctres.09.202306.23-00106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: In early 2022, the use of adjuvant nivolumab for patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma was approved in Japan, European countries, and USA based on the positive results of CheckMate 274 trial, which included participants who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Subgroup analyses of CheckMate 274 trial does not report response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Herein, we investigated the association between response to NAC and survival outcomes after radical surgery in patients with residual muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma and/or lymph node disease. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included a total of 95 NAC-treated patients with yielding pathological (yp) T2 and/or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma on radical surgery specimens. Based on the comparison of clinical T and N category with yp T and N category, the patients were categorized into three groups: down-staged ypT2 (n=14), no-changed ypT2 (n=39), and up-staged ypT2 groups (n=42). Results: There was no significant difference in extra-urinary tract recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival after the radical surgery among three groups. Subgroup analysis of a bladder cancer cohort showed a marginal association between better response and longer cancer-specific survival ( P =0.073). Conclusion: Our finding suggested that adjuvant nivolumab should be considered for all the patients with pathological ypT2 or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma regardless of response to NAC. Further research is mandatory in finding predictive factors that serve in decision-making for NAC-treated patients who are likely to benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Relevance for patients: To develop a decision-making tool for adjuvant nivolumab, we investigated the association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival after radical surgery. Further research","PeriodicalId":94073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and translational research","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome after radical surgery in patients with yielding pathological T2 and/or N+ urothelial carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.18053/jctres.09.202306.23-00106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: In early 2022, the use of adjuvant nivolumab for patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma was approved in Japan, European countries, and USA based on the positive results of CheckMate 274 trial, which included participants who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Subgroup analyses of CheckMate 274 trial does not report response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Herein, we investigated the association between response to NAC and survival outcomes after radical surgery in patients with residual muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma and/or lymph node disease. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included a total of 95 NAC-treated patients with yielding pathological (yp) T2 and/or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma on radical surgery specimens. Based on the comparison of clinical T and N category with yp T and N category, the patients were categorized into three groups: down-staged ypT2 (n=14), no-changed ypT2 (n=39), and up-staged ypT2 groups (n=42). Results: There was no significant difference in extra-urinary tract recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival after the radical surgery among three groups. Subgroup analysis of a bladder cancer cohort showed a marginal association between better response and longer cancer-specific survival ( P =0.073). Conclusion: Our finding suggested that adjuvant nivolumab should be considered for all the patients with pathological ypT2 or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma regardless of response to NAC. Further research is mandatory in finding predictive factors that serve in decision-making for NAC-treated patients who are likely to benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Relevance for patients: To develop a decision-making tool for adjuvant nivolumab, we investigated the association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival after radical surgery. Further research\",\"PeriodicalId\":94073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical and translational research\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical and translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18053/jctres.09.202306.23-00106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and translational research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18053/jctres.09.202306.23-00106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome after radical surgery in patients with yielding pathological T2 and/or N+ urothelial carcinoma
Background and Aim: In early 2022, the use of adjuvant nivolumab for patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma was approved in Japan, European countries, and USA based on the positive results of CheckMate 274 trial, which included participants who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Subgroup analyses of CheckMate 274 trial does not report response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Herein, we investigated the association between response to NAC and survival outcomes after radical surgery in patients with residual muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma and/or lymph node disease. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included a total of 95 NAC-treated patients with yielding pathological (yp) T2 and/or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma on radical surgery specimens. Based on the comparison of clinical T and N category with yp T and N category, the patients were categorized into three groups: down-staged ypT2 (n=14), no-changed ypT2 (n=39), and up-staged ypT2 groups (n=42). Results: There was no significant difference in extra-urinary tract recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival after the radical surgery among three groups. Subgroup analysis of a bladder cancer cohort showed a marginal association between better response and longer cancer-specific survival ( P =0.073). Conclusion: Our finding suggested that adjuvant nivolumab should be considered for all the patients with pathological ypT2 or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma regardless of response to NAC. Further research is mandatory in finding predictive factors that serve in decision-making for NAC-treated patients who are likely to benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Relevance for patients: To develop a decision-making tool for adjuvant nivolumab, we investigated the association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival after radical surgery. Further research