病理T2和/或N+尿路上皮癌患者对新辅助化疗的反应与根治性手术后生存结果的关系

{"title":"病理T2和/或N+尿路上皮癌患者对新辅助化疗的反应与根治性手术后生存结果的关系","authors":"","doi":"10.18053/jctres.09.202306.23-00106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: In early 2022, the use of adjuvant nivolumab for patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma was approved in Japan, European countries, and USA based on the positive results of CheckMate 274 trial, which included participants who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Subgroup analyses of CheckMate 274 trial does not report response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Herein, we investigated the association between response to NAC and survival outcomes after radical surgery in patients with residual muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma and/or lymph node disease. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included a total of 95 NAC-treated patients with yielding pathological (yp) T2  and/or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma on radical surgery specimens. Based on the comparison of clinical T and N category with yp T and N category, the patients were categorized into three groups: down-staged ypT2  (n=14), no-changed ypT2  (n=39), and up-staged ypT2  groups (n=42). Results: There was no significant difference in extra-urinary tract recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival after the radical surgery among three groups. Subgroup analysis of a bladder cancer cohort showed a marginal association between better response and longer cancer-specific survival ( P =0.073). Conclusion: Our finding suggested that adjuvant nivolumab should be considered for all the patients with pathological ypT2  or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma regardless of response to NAC. Further research is mandatory in finding predictive factors that serve in decision-making for NAC-treated patients who are likely to benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Relevance for patients: To develop a decision-making tool for adjuvant nivolumab, we investigated the association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival after radical surgery. Further research","PeriodicalId":94073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and translational research","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome after radical surgery in patients with yielding pathological T2 and/or N+ urothelial carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.18053/jctres.09.202306.23-00106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: In early 2022, the use of adjuvant nivolumab for patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma was approved in Japan, European countries, and USA based on the positive results of CheckMate 274 trial, which included participants who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Subgroup analyses of CheckMate 274 trial does not report response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Herein, we investigated the association between response to NAC and survival outcomes after radical surgery in patients with residual muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma and/or lymph node disease. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included a total of 95 NAC-treated patients with yielding pathological (yp) T2  and/or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma on radical surgery specimens. Based on the comparison of clinical T and N category with yp T and N category, the patients were categorized into three groups: down-staged ypT2  (n=14), no-changed ypT2  (n=39), and up-staged ypT2  groups (n=42). Results: There was no significant difference in extra-urinary tract recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival after the radical surgery among three groups. Subgroup analysis of a bladder cancer cohort showed a marginal association between better response and longer cancer-specific survival ( P =0.073). Conclusion: Our finding suggested that adjuvant nivolumab should be considered for all the patients with pathological ypT2  or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma regardless of response to NAC. Further research is mandatory in finding predictive factors that serve in decision-making for NAC-treated patients who are likely to benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Relevance for patients: To develop a decision-making tool for adjuvant nivolumab, we investigated the association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival after radical surgery. Further research\",\"PeriodicalId\":94073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical and translational research\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical and translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18053/jctres.09.202306.23-00106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and translational research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18053/jctres.09.202306.23-00106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome after radical surgery in patients with yielding pathological T2 and/or N+ urothelial carcinoma
Background and Aim: In early 2022, the use of adjuvant nivolumab for patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma was approved in Japan, European countries, and USA based on the positive results of CheckMate 274 trial, which included participants who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Subgroup analyses of CheckMate 274 trial does not report response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Herein, we investigated the association between response to NAC and survival outcomes after radical surgery in patients with residual muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma and/or lymph node disease. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included a total of 95 NAC-treated patients with yielding pathological (yp) T2  and/or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma on radical surgery specimens. Based on the comparison of clinical T and N category with yp T and N category, the patients were categorized into three groups: down-staged ypT2  (n=14), no-changed ypT2  (n=39), and up-staged ypT2  groups (n=42). Results: There was no significant difference in extra-urinary tract recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival after the radical surgery among three groups. Subgroup analysis of a bladder cancer cohort showed a marginal association between better response and longer cancer-specific survival ( P =0.073). Conclusion: Our finding suggested that adjuvant nivolumab should be considered for all the patients with pathological ypT2  or ypN+ urothelial carcinoma regardless of response to NAC. Further research is mandatory in finding predictive factors that serve in decision-making for NAC-treated patients who are likely to benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. Relevance for patients: To develop a decision-making tool for adjuvant nivolumab, we investigated the association between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival after radical surgery. Further research
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信