星状神经节阻滞小鼠模型的建立及其对双侧大脑皮质血流的影响

Jiahua Wang, Wei Zhou, Xiaohong Wang, Shiting Yan, Shunping Yan, Ying Wang, Yanlong Yu, Hu Li, Dongsheng Zhang, Zhuan Zhang
{"title":"星状神经节阻滞小鼠模型的建立及其对双侧大脑皮质血流的影响","authors":"Jiahua Wang, Wei Zhou, Xiaohong Wang, Shiting Yan, Shunping Yan, Ying Wang, Yanlong Yu, Hu Li, Dongsheng Zhang, Zhuan Zhang","doi":"10.31636/pmjua.v8i1-2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has significant therapeutic efficacy in various clinical practices and further exploration of SGB is needed. The mouse model of SGB had not been reported and the effect on cerebral cortical blood flow (CCBF) was controversial. We aimed to establish an stellate ganglion block (SGB) mouse model and explore how SGB influences CCBF.&#x0D; Methods: Male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into five groups (n = 6): groups L (left SGB) and R (right SGB) received an injection of 0.25% ropivacaine hydrochloride (0.08 mL) on the respective stellate ganglion; similarly, groups SL (left saline control) and SR (right saline control) received an injection of normal saline (0.08 mL) instead. Group C received no intervention. CCBF was assessed before SGB (T0) and 10 (T1), 30 (T2), 60 (T3), 90 (T4), and 120 min (T5) after SGB using laser speckle contrast imaging system.&#x0D; Results: The SGB mouse model was successfully established in groups L and R. Compared with baseline, CCBF on the blocked side decreased at T1, increased at T2–T5, and peaked at T3 in groups L and R (all, P < 0.01). Compared with groups C and SL, the CCBF on the left side decreased at T1 and increased at T2–T5 in group L (all, P < 0.05). A similar trend was noted in groups C and SR relative to group R. The CCBF on the unblocked side decreased at T1, increased at T2–T5, and peaked at T3 in groups L and R (all, P < 0.01).&#x0D; Conclusions: The SGB mouse model was established successfully. Unilateral SGB can affect bilateral cerebral cortical blood flow, which shows a transitory decrease followed by a significant increase for at least 2 h.","PeriodicalId":32866,"journal":{"name":"Meditsina boliu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment of A Mouse Model of Stellate Ganglion Block and Subsequent Biphasic Effects on Bilateral Cerebral Cortical Blood Flow\",\"authors\":\"Jiahua Wang, Wei Zhou, Xiaohong Wang, Shiting Yan, Shunping Yan, Ying Wang, Yanlong Yu, Hu Li, Dongsheng Zhang, Zhuan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.31636/pmjua.v8i1-2.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objectives: Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has significant therapeutic efficacy in various clinical practices and further exploration of SGB is needed. The mouse model of SGB had not been reported and the effect on cerebral cortical blood flow (CCBF) was controversial. We aimed to establish an stellate ganglion block (SGB) mouse model and explore how SGB influences CCBF.&#x0D; Methods: Male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into five groups (n = 6): groups L (left SGB) and R (right SGB) received an injection of 0.25% ropivacaine hydrochloride (0.08 mL) on the respective stellate ganglion; similarly, groups SL (left saline control) and SR (right saline control) received an injection of normal saline (0.08 mL) instead. Group C received no intervention. CCBF was assessed before SGB (T0) and 10 (T1), 30 (T2), 60 (T3), 90 (T4), and 120 min (T5) after SGB using laser speckle contrast imaging system.&#x0D; Results: The SGB mouse model was successfully established in groups L and R. Compared with baseline, CCBF on the blocked side decreased at T1, increased at T2–T5, and peaked at T3 in groups L and R (all, P < 0.01). Compared with groups C and SL, the CCBF on the left side decreased at T1 and increased at T2–T5 in group L (all, P < 0.05). A similar trend was noted in groups C and SR relative to group R. The CCBF on the unblocked side decreased at T1, increased at T2–T5, and peaked at T3 in groups L and R (all, P < 0.01).&#x0D; Conclusions: The SGB mouse model was established successfully. Unilateral SGB can affect bilateral cerebral cortical blood flow, which shows a transitory decrease followed by a significant increase for at least 2 h.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meditsina boliu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meditsina boliu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31636/pmjua.v8i1-2.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditsina boliu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31636/pmjua.v8i1-2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:星状神经节阻滞(SGB)在各种临床实践中具有显著的治疗效果,尚需进一步探索。SGB小鼠模型尚未见报道,其对大脑皮质血流量的影响也存在争议。我们旨在建立星状神经节阻滞(SGB)小鼠模型,探讨SGB对CCBF的影响。方法:雄性C57BL/6小鼠随机分为5组(n = 6): L组(左SGB)和R组(右SGB)分别在星状神经节注射0.25%盐酸罗哌卡因(0.08 mL);同样,SL组(左生理盐水对照组)和SR组(右生理盐水对照组)注射生理盐水(0.08 mL)。C组不进行干预。采用激光散斑对比成像系统,在SGB前(T0)和SGB后10 (T1)、30 (T2)、60 (T3)、90 (T4)、120 min (T5)评估CCBF。 结果:L组和R组小鼠SGB模型成功建立,与基线比较,L组和R组阻滞侧CCBF在T1时降低,在T2-T5时升高,在T3时达到峰值(均,P <0.01)。与C组和SL组比较,L组左侧CCBF在T1时降低,在T2-T5时升高(均,P <0.05)。与R组相比,C组和SR组的CCBF在T1时下降,在T2-T5时增加,在T3时达到峰值(P <0.01)强生# x0D;结论:成功建立了SGB小鼠模型。单侧SGB可影响双侧大脑皮质血流,表现为短暂性下降,然后至少2小时内显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishment of A Mouse Model of Stellate Ganglion Block and Subsequent Biphasic Effects on Bilateral Cerebral Cortical Blood Flow
Background and objectives: Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has significant therapeutic efficacy in various clinical practices and further exploration of SGB is needed. The mouse model of SGB had not been reported and the effect on cerebral cortical blood flow (CCBF) was controversial. We aimed to establish an stellate ganglion block (SGB) mouse model and explore how SGB influences CCBF. Methods: Male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into five groups (n = 6): groups L (left SGB) and R (right SGB) received an injection of 0.25% ropivacaine hydrochloride (0.08 mL) on the respective stellate ganglion; similarly, groups SL (left saline control) and SR (right saline control) received an injection of normal saline (0.08 mL) instead. Group C received no intervention. CCBF was assessed before SGB (T0) and 10 (T1), 30 (T2), 60 (T3), 90 (T4), and 120 min (T5) after SGB using laser speckle contrast imaging system. Results: The SGB mouse model was successfully established in groups L and R. Compared with baseline, CCBF on the blocked side decreased at T1, increased at T2–T5, and peaked at T3 in groups L and R (all, P < 0.01). Compared with groups C and SL, the CCBF on the left side decreased at T1 and increased at T2–T5 in group L (all, P < 0.05). A similar trend was noted in groups C and SR relative to group R. The CCBF on the unblocked side decreased at T1, increased at T2–T5, and peaked at T3 in groups L and R (all, P < 0.01). Conclusions: The SGB mouse model was established successfully. Unilateral SGB can affect bilateral cerebral cortical blood flow, which shows a transitory decrease followed by a significant increase for at least 2 h.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信