{"title":"单中心2台数字减影血管造影机经动脉化疗栓塞的辐射剂量和幻皮剂量评估","authors":"Varaporn Pong-Inwong, Woranan Kirisattayakul, Supawan Dawong, Areeya Jitvikham, Anucha Ahooja, Panuwat Pattum, Rattapong Karawek, Waraporn Sudjai, Nittima Rungpin","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.2023996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to assess and compare the radiation dose and phantom skin dose in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of two digital subtraction angiography (DSA) units (unit A: Philips Allura Xper FD20, unit B: Artis zee biplane)Material and Methods: The dose area product (DAP), reference air kerma (RAK), number of images (NI) and fluoroscopy time (FT) of 240 cases (120 cases/DSA unit) were retrospectively reviewed and collected. To assess skin dose, 28 nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were placed on the phantom’s back and the TACE procedure was performed with 2 DSA units.Results: The median DAP, RAK, NI, and FT of unit A were 200.49 Gy·cm2, 379.84 mGy, 115 images, and 9.04 minutes, while for unit B were 109.74 Gy·cm2, 276.55 mGy, 121 images, and 10.19 minutes, respectively. Significant differences were observed in DAP, RAK, and FT. The RAK of all patients was less than 2 Gy. The phantom skin dose obtained from unit B was significantly lower than that of unit A in all positions. The peak skin doses of the phantom studies from both units were 973.15 and 658.66 mGy, respectively.Conclusion: The median DAP of the unit A DSA was higher than the national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). The TACE procedure from both units is safe from skin reaction. To benefit patients, the planning of a dose optimization process of unit A DSA and management of TACE cases using the existing DSA machine must be considered.","PeriodicalId":93205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Radiation Dose and Phantom Skin Dose in Transarterial Chemoembolization in a Single Center with 2 Digital Subtraction Angiography Units\",\"authors\":\"Varaporn Pong-Inwong, Woranan Kirisattayakul, Supawan Dawong, Areeya Jitvikham, Anucha Ahooja, Panuwat Pattum, Rattapong Karawek, Waraporn Sudjai, Nittima Rungpin\",\"doi\":\"10.31584/jhsmr.2023996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: This study aimed to assess and compare the radiation dose and phantom skin dose in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of two digital subtraction angiography (DSA) units (unit A: Philips Allura Xper FD20, unit B: Artis zee biplane)Material and Methods: The dose area product (DAP), reference air kerma (RAK), number of images (NI) and fluoroscopy time (FT) of 240 cases (120 cases/DSA unit) were retrospectively reviewed and collected. To assess skin dose, 28 nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were placed on the phantom’s back and the TACE procedure was performed with 2 DSA units.Results: The median DAP, RAK, NI, and FT of unit A were 200.49 Gy·cm2, 379.84 mGy, 115 images, and 9.04 minutes, while for unit B were 109.74 Gy·cm2, 276.55 mGy, 121 images, and 10.19 minutes, respectively. Significant differences were observed in DAP, RAK, and FT. The RAK of all patients was less than 2 Gy. The phantom skin dose obtained from unit B was significantly lower than that of unit A in all positions. The peak skin doses of the phantom studies from both units were 973.15 and 658.66 mGy, respectively.Conclusion: The median DAP of the unit A DSA was higher than the national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). The TACE procedure from both units is safe from skin reaction. To benefit patients, the planning of a dose optimization process of unit A DSA and management of TACE cases using the existing DSA machine must be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估和比较两种数字减影血管造影(DSA)单元(A: Philips Allura Xper FD20, B: Artis zee双翼机)经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的辐射剂量和幻影皮肤剂量。材料和方法:回顾性分析和收集240例(120例/DSA单元)的剂量面积积(DAP)、参考空气密度(RAK)、图像数(NI)和透视时间(FT)。为了评估皮肤剂量,将28个纳米点光刺激发光剂量计(osld)放置在幻影背部,并使用2个DSA单元进行TACE手术。结果:A单元的中位DAP、RAK、NI和FT分别为200.49 Gy·cm2、379.84 mGy、115张图像和9.04 min; B单元的中位DAP、RAK、NI和FT分别为109.74 Gy·cm2、276.55 mGy、121张图像和10.19 min。DAP、RAK、FT均有显著性差异,所有患者的RAK均小于2 Gy。在所有体位,B单元获得的幻皮剂量均显著低于A单元。两个单位的幻影研究的皮肤峰值剂量分别为973.15和658.66毫戈瑞。结论:单位A DSA的中位DAP高于国家诊断参考水平(DRLs)。两个单位的TACE程序是安全的,没有皮肤反应。为了使患者受益,必须考虑单位a DSA剂量优化流程的规划和使用现有DSA机管理TACE病例。
Assessment of Radiation Dose and Phantom Skin Dose in Transarterial Chemoembolization in a Single Center with 2 Digital Subtraction Angiography Units
Objectives: This study aimed to assess and compare the radiation dose and phantom skin dose in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of two digital subtraction angiography (DSA) units (unit A: Philips Allura Xper FD20, unit B: Artis zee biplane)Material and Methods: The dose area product (DAP), reference air kerma (RAK), number of images (NI) and fluoroscopy time (FT) of 240 cases (120 cases/DSA unit) were retrospectively reviewed and collected. To assess skin dose, 28 nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were placed on the phantom’s back and the TACE procedure was performed with 2 DSA units.Results: The median DAP, RAK, NI, and FT of unit A were 200.49 Gy·cm2, 379.84 mGy, 115 images, and 9.04 minutes, while for unit B were 109.74 Gy·cm2, 276.55 mGy, 121 images, and 10.19 minutes, respectively. Significant differences were observed in DAP, RAK, and FT. The RAK of all patients was less than 2 Gy. The phantom skin dose obtained from unit B was significantly lower than that of unit A in all positions. The peak skin doses of the phantom studies from both units were 973.15 and 658.66 mGy, respectively.Conclusion: The median DAP of the unit A DSA was higher than the national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). The TACE procedure from both units is safe from skin reaction. To benefit patients, the planning of a dose optimization process of unit A DSA and management of TACE cases using the existing DSA machine must be considered.