Chiara Rossi, Albert K. Culbreath, Timothy B. Brenneman, Ronald Scott Tubbs, Daniel J. Anco, George Vellidis, Cristiane Pilon
{"title":"多菌灵替代百菌清防治花生叶斑病","authors":"Chiara Rossi, Albert K. Culbreath, Timothy B. Brenneman, Ronald Scott Tubbs, Daniel J. Anco, George Vellidis, Cristiane Pilon","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) is susceptible to leaf spot diseases caused by the fungi <i>Nothopassalora personata</i> and <i>Passalora arachidicola</i>, which can decrease yield substantially. Chlorothalonil is one of the most widely used fungicides to control these diseases but was recently banned in the European Union due to toxicity to amphibians and fish. Dodine is an alternative fungicide with a similar range of activity. However, information about its impact on the peanut physiology is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of dodine on leaf photosynthesis, yield, and pod quality of peanut and evaluate the potential of dodine as a replacement of chlorothalonil in the control of leaf spot diseases. A 3-year field experiment was conducted using Georgia-06G. Treatments consisted of chlorothalonil at 0.86 kg a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup> (high rate), chlorothalonil at 0.43 kg a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup> (low rate), dodine at 0.68 kg a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup> (high rate), and dodine at 0.34 kg a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup> (low rate). Photosynthetic efficiency was altered by fungicide in only a few instances, and a clear trend was not observed. The high rate of dodine resulted in the least defoliation caused by leaf spot of all fungicide treatments. Pod maturity, yield, and grading parameters were not affected by fungicide. Overall, dodine did not impact negatively the photosynthetic activity, pod quality, and yield of peanut. Moreover, this chemistry was efficient in controlling leaf spot diseases under heavy disease pressure; therefore, dodine is a potential replacement of chlorothalonil in the control of leaf spot diseases in peanut.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 1","pages":"202-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21508","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dodine as an alternative to chlorothalonil in the control of leaf spot diseases in peanut\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Rossi, Albert K. Culbreath, Timothy B. Brenneman, Ronald Scott Tubbs, Daniel J. Anco, George Vellidis, Cristiane Pilon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) is susceptible to leaf spot diseases caused by the fungi <i>Nothopassalora personata</i> and <i>Passalora arachidicola</i>, which can decrease yield substantially. Chlorothalonil is one of the most widely used fungicides to control these diseases but was recently banned in the European Union due to toxicity to amphibians and fish. Dodine is an alternative fungicide with a similar range of activity. However, information about its impact on the peanut physiology is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of dodine on leaf photosynthesis, yield, and pod quality of peanut and evaluate the potential of dodine as a replacement of chlorothalonil in the control of leaf spot diseases. A 3-year field experiment was conducted using Georgia-06G. Treatments consisted of chlorothalonil at 0.86 kg a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup> (high rate), chlorothalonil at 0.43 kg a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup> (low rate), dodine at 0.68 kg a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup> (high rate), and dodine at 0.34 kg a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup> (low rate). Photosynthetic efficiency was altered by fungicide in only a few instances, and a clear trend was not observed. The high rate of dodine resulted in the least defoliation caused by leaf spot of all fungicide treatments. Pod maturity, yield, and grading parameters were not affected by fungicide. Overall, dodine did not impact negatively the photosynthetic activity, pod quality, and yield of peanut. Moreover, this chemistry was efficient in controlling leaf spot diseases under heavy disease pressure; therefore, dodine is a potential replacement of chlorothalonil in the control of leaf spot diseases in peanut.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"202-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21508\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21508\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
花生(Arachis hypogaea L.)容易感染由真菌 Nothopassalora personata 和 Passalora arachidicola 引起的叶斑病,这种病会使产量大幅下降。百菌清是控制这些病害最广泛使用的杀菌剂之一,但由于对两栖动物和鱼类有毒,最近在欧盟被禁用。多菌灵是一种替代杀菌剂,具有类似的活性。然而,有关它对花生生理机能影响的信息还很缺乏。本研究的目的是评估多菌灵对花生叶片光合作用、产量和豆荚质量的影响,并评估多菌灵替代百菌清防治叶斑病的潜力。使用 Georgia-06G 进行了为期 3 年的田间试验。处理包括百菌清 0.86 kg a.i. ha-1(高用量)、百菌清 0.43 kg a.i. ha-1(低用量)、多丁 0.68 kg a.i. ha-1(高用量)和多丁 0.34 kg a.i. ha-1(低用量)。杀菌剂仅在少数情况下改变了光合效率,而且没有观察到明显的趋势。在所有杀菌剂处理中,高剂量的多菌灵导致的叶斑病落叶最少。荚果成熟度、产量和分级参数不受杀菌剂的影响。总之,多菌灵不会对花生的光合作用、豆荚质量和产量产生负面影响。此外,在病害压力较大的情况下,该化学成分能有效防治叶斑病;因此,多菌灵有望替代百菌清来防治花生叶斑病。
Dodine as an alternative to chlorothalonil in the control of leaf spot diseases in peanut
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is susceptible to leaf spot diseases caused by the fungi Nothopassalora personata and Passalora arachidicola, which can decrease yield substantially. Chlorothalonil is one of the most widely used fungicides to control these diseases but was recently banned in the European Union due to toxicity to amphibians and fish. Dodine is an alternative fungicide with a similar range of activity. However, information about its impact on the peanut physiology is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of dodine on leaf photosynthesis, yield, and pod quality of peanut and evaluate the potential of dodine as a replacement of chlorothalonil in the control of leaf spot diseases. A 3-year field experiment was conducted using Georgia-06G. Treatments consisted of chlorothalonil at 0.86 kg a.i. ha−1 (high rate), chlorothalonil at 0.43 kg a.i. ha−1 (low rate), dodine at 0.68 kg a.i. ha−1 (high rate), and dodine at 0.34 kg a.i. ha−1 (low rate). Photosynthetic efficiency was altered by fungicide in only a few instances, and a clear trend was not observed. The high rate of dodine resulted in the least defoliation caused by leaf spot of all fungicide treatments. Pod maturity, yield, and grading parameters were not affected by fungicide. Overall, dodine did not impact negatively the photosynthetic activity, pod quality, and yield of peanut. Moreover, this chemistry was efficient in controlling leaf spot diseases under heavy disease pressure; therefore, dodine is a potential replacement of chlorothalonil in the control of leaf spot diseases in peanut.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.