不合适的CSR是新颖的吗?探讨企业社会责任知识、品牌事业契合度和感知新颖性对消费者反应的影响

IF 5.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Rachel Esther Lim, Ji Mi Hong
{"title":"不合适的CSR是新颖的吗?探讨企业社会责任知识、品牌事业契合度和感知新颖性对消费者反应的影响","authors":"Rachel Esther Lim, Ji Mi Hong","doi":"10.1080/02650487.2023.2276625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThree experimental studies were carried out to understand how consumer knowledge of corporate social responsibility (CSR) affects their responses to a brand’s social initiatives for high versus low brand–cause fit. Studies 1 and 2 examined the effects of subjective CSR knowledge on consumer responses. Study 1 indicated that consumers with low CSR knowledge showed more favorable responses to high brand–cause fit CSR, whereas consumers with high CSR knowledge preferred low brand–cause fit CSR. In Study 2, the perceived novelty of a brand’s CSR initiative mediated the interaction effect on attitudes toward advertisements and brands. Study 3 replicated the results of Study 2 using a real brand and measuring objective CSR knowledge. The findings of the three experimental studies provide both theoretical and practical insights into how consumers’ knowledge of CSR affects their response to CSR initiatives, especially regarding different types of brand–cause fit.Keywords: Corporate social responsibility (CSR)brand–cause fitCSR knowledgesubjective knowledgeobjective knowledgeperceived novelty Disclosure statementThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.Data availability statementData will be made available on request.","PeriodicalId":48111,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advertising","volume":"11 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is unfit CSR novel? Exploring the impact of CSR knowledge, brand–cause fit, and perceived novelty on consumer response\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Esther Lim, Ji Mi Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02650487.2023.2276625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThree experimental studies were carried out to understand how consumer knowledge of corporate social responsibility (CSR) affects their responses to a brand’s social initiatives for high versus low brand–cause fit. Studies 1 and 2 examined the effects of subjective CSR knowledge on consumer responses. Study 1 indicated that consumers with low CSR knowledge showed more favorable responses to high brand–cause fit CSR, whereas consumers with high CSR knowledge preferred low brand–cause fit CSR. In Study 2, the perceived novelty of a brand’s CSR initiative mediated the interaction effect on attitudes toward advertisements and brands. Study 3 replicated the results of Study 2 using a real brand and measuring objective CSR knowledge. The findings of the three experimental studies provide both theoretical and practical insights into how consumers’ knowledge of CSR affects their response to CSR initiatives, especially regarding different types of brand–cause fit.Keywords: Corporate social responsibility (CSR)brand–cause fitCSR knowledgesubjective knowledgeobjective knowledgeperceived novelty Disclosure statementThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.Data availability statementData will be made available on request.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advertising\",\"volume\":\"11 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advertising\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2276625\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2276625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文进行了三项实验研究,以了解消费者的企业社会责任知识如何影响他们对品牌社会倡议的反应。研究1和研究2考察了主观企业社会责任知识对消费者反应的影响。研究1表明,企业社会责任知识水平低的消费者对品牌原因契合度高的企业社会责任反应更积极,而企业社会责任知识水平高的消费者对品牌原因契合度低的企业社会责任反应更积极。在研究2中,品牌社会责任主动性的感知新颖性在广告态度和品牌态度的交互作用中起中介作用。研究3使用真实的品牌和测量客观的企业社会责任知识复制了研究2的结果。这三个实验研究的结果为消费者的社会责任知识如何影响他们对社会责任倡议的反应提供了理论和实践的见解,特别是在不同类型的品牌事业契合方面。关键词:企业社会责任品牌事业契合企业社会责任知识主观知识客观知识感知新颖性披露声明作者声明不存在利益冲突数据可用性声明数据可应要求提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is unfit CSR novel? Exploring the impact of CSR knowledge, brand–cause fit, and perceived novelty on consumer response
AbstractThree experimental studies were carried out to understand how consumer knowledge of corporate social responsibility (CSR) affects their responses to a brand’s social initiatives for high versus low brand–cause fit. Studies 1 and 2 examined the effects of subjective CSR knowledge on consumer responses. Study 1 indicated that consumers with low CSR knowledge showed more favorable responses to high brand–cause fit CSR, whereas consumers with high CSR knowledge preferred low brand–cause fit CSR. In Study 2, the perceived novelty of a brand’s CSR initiative mediated the interaction effect on attitudes toward advertisements and brands. Study 3 replicated the results of Study 2 using a real brand and measuring objective CSR knowledge. The findings of the three experimental studies provide both theoretical and practical insights into how consumers’ knowledge of CSR affects their response to CSR initiatives, especially regarding different types of brand–cause fit.Keywords: Corporate social responsibility (CSR)brand–cause fitCSR knowledgesubjective knowledgeobjective knowledgeperceived novelty Disclosure statementThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.Data availability statementData will be made available on request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
19.40%
发文量
66
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信