在学术机构中制度化社区参与的转化科学:社区利益相关者驱动的过程

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Michael R. Duke, Angela Sun, Paula Fleisher, Angela Gallegos-Castillo, Monique LeSarre, Joyce Cheng, Kara Young, Mark J. Pletcher, Tung Nguyen, Jane Jih
{"title":"在学术机构中制度化社区参与的转化科学:社区利益相关者驱动的过程","authors":"Michael R. Duke, Angela Sun, Paula Fleisher, Angela Gallegos-Castillo, Monique LeSarre, Joyce Cheng, Kara Young, Mark J. Pletcher, Tung Nguyen, Jane Jih","doi":"10.1353/cpr.2023.a907978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: Although studies have described the power imbalance in academic-community partnerships, little has been published describing how community-based participatory research–informed practitioners can change academic institutions to promote more effective community-engaged research. Objectives: This paper describes a university-funded community-based participatory project in which academic researchers and their community partners worked together to articulate, develop and advocate for institutionalizing best practices for equitable partnerships throughout the university. Methods: Findings derive from a collaborative ethnographic process evaluation. Results: The study describes the integral steps proposed to promote equitable community–university research collaboration, the process by which these principles and best practice recommendations were developed, and the institutional change outcomes of this process. Conclusions: When universities make even small investments toward promoting and nurturing community-engaged research, the quality of the science can be enhanced to advance health equity and community–university relationships can improve, particularly if based on trust, mutual respect, and openness to accomplish a shared vision.","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutionalizing Community-engaged Translational Science in an Academic Institution: A Community Stakeholder-Driven Process\",\"authors\":\"Michael R. Duke, Angela Sun, Paula Fleisher, Angela Gallegos-Castillo, Monique LeSarre, Joyce Cheng, Kara Young, Mark J. Pletcher, Tung Nguyen, Jane Jih\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cpr.2023.a907978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Background: Although studies have described the power imbalance in academic-community partnerships, little has been published describing how community-based participatory research–informed practitioners can change academic institutions to promote more effective community-engaged research. Objectives: This paper describes a university-funded community-based participatory project in which academic researchers and their community partners worked together to articulate, develop and advocate for institutionalizing best practices for equitable partnerships throughout the university. Methods: Findings derive from a collaborative ethnographic process evaluation. Results: The study describes the integral steps proposed to promote equitable community–university research collaboration, the process by which these principles and best practice recommendations were developed, and the institutional change outcomes of this process. Conclusions: When universities make even small investments toward promoting and nurturing community-engaged research, the quality of the science can be enhanced to advance health equity and community–university relationships can improve, particularly if based on trust, mutual respect, and openness to accomplish a shared vision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a907978\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a907978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景:虽然已有研究描述了学术与社区伙伴关系中的权力不平衡,但很少有研究描述社区参与式研究的实践者如何改变学术机构以促进更有效的社区参与研究。目标:本文描述了一个由大学资助的基于社区的参与性项目,在这个项目中,学术研究人员和他们的社区合作伙伴共同努力,阐明、发展和倡导在整个大学内建立公平伙伴关系的最佳实践。方法:研究结果来自一项合作的民族志过程评估。结果:本研究描述了促进公平的社区-大学研究合作的整体步骤,这些原则和最佳实践建议的发展过程,以及这一过程的制度变革结果。结论:当大学为促进和培养社区参与的研究做出哪怕是很小的投资时,科学的质量就可以得到提高,从而促进健康公平,社区-大学关系也可以得到改善,特别是如果基于信任、相互尊重和开放来实现共同的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutionalizing Community-engaged Translational Science in an Academic Institution: A Community Stakeholder-Driven Process
Abstract: Background: Although studies have described the power imbalance in academic-community partnerships, little has been published describing how community-based participatory research–informed practitioners can change academic institutions to promote more effective community-engaged research. Objectives: This paper describes a university-funded community-based participatory project in which academic researchers and their community partners worked together to articulate, develop and advocate for institutionalizing best practices for equitable partnerships throughout the university. Methods: Findings derive from a collaborative ethnographic process evaluation. Results: The study describes the integral steps proposed to promote equitable community–university research collaboration, the process by which these principles and best practice recommendations were developed, and the institutional change outcomes of this process. Conclusions: When universities make even small investments toward promoting and nurturing community-engaged research, the quality of the science can be enhanced to advance health equity and community–university relationships can improve, particularly if based on trust, mutual respect, and openness to accomplish a shared vision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信