概率终止工具琥珀

IF 0.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Marcel Moosbrugger, Ezio Bartocci, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Laura Kovács
{"title":"概率终止工具琥珀","authors":"Marcel Moosbrugger, Ezio Bartocci, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Laura Kovács","doi":"10.1007/s10703-023-00424-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We describe the Amber tool for proving and refuting the termination of a class of probabilistic while-programs with polynomial arithmetic, in a fully automated manner. Amber combines martingale theory with properties of asymptotic bounding functions and implements relaxed versions of existing probabilistic termination proof rules to prove/disprove (positive) almost sure termination of probabilistic loops. Amber supports programs parametrized by symbolic constants and drawing from common probability distributions. Our experimental comparisons give practical evidence of Amber outperforming existing state-of-the-art tools.","PeriodicalId":12430,"journal":{"name":"Formal Methods in System Design","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The probabilistic termination tool amber\",\"authors\":\"Marcel Moosbrugger, Ezio Bartocci, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Laura Kovács\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10703-023-00424-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We describe the Amber tool for proving and refuting the termination of a class of probabilistic while-programs with polynomial arithmetic, in a fully automated manner. Amber combines martingale theory with properties of asymptotic bounding functions and implements relaxed versions of existing probabilistic termination proof rules to prove/disprove (positive) almost sure termination of probabilistic loops. Amber supports programs parametrized by symbolic constants and drawing from common probability distributions. Our experimental comparisons give practical evidence of Amber outperforming existing state-of-the-art tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formal Methods in System Design\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formal Methods in System Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10703-023-00424-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formal Methods in System Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10703-023-00424-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:本文描述了一个用多项式算法自动证明和驳斥一类概率同时程序终止的Amber工具。Amber将鞅理论与渐近边界函数的性质结合起来,实现了现有概率终止证明规则的放宽版本,以证明/反证(正)几乎确定的概率循环终止。Amber支持由符号常量参数化的程序,并从常见的概率分布中绘制。我们的实验比较给出了Amber优于现有的最先进的工具的实际证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The probabilistic termination tool amber

The probabilistic termination tool amber
Abstract We describe the Amber tool for proving and refuting the termination of a class of probabilistic while-programs with polynomial arithmetic, in a fully automated manner. Amber combines martingale theory with properties of asymptotic bounding functions and implements relaxed versions of existing probabilistic termination proof rules to prove/disprove (positive) almost sure termination of probabilistic loops. Amber supports programs parametrized by symbolic constants and drawing from common probability distributions. Our experimental comparisons give practical evidence of Amber outperforming existing state-of-the-art tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Formal Methods in System Design
Formal Methods in System Design 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The focus of this journal is on formal methods for designing, implementing, and validating the correctness of hardware (VLSI) and software systems. The stimulus for starting a journal with this goal came from both academia and industry. In both areas, interest in the use of formal methods has increased rapidly during the past few years. The enormous cost and time required to validate new designs has led to the realization that more powerful techniques must be developed. A number of techniques and tools are currently being devised for improving the reliability, and robustness of complex hardware and software systems. While the boundary between the (sub)components of a system that are cast in hardware, firmware, or software continues to blur, the relevant design disciplines and formal methods are maturing rapidly. Consequently, an important (and useful) collection of commonly applicable formal methods are expected to emerge that will strongly influence future design environments and design methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信