书评:《社会主义走向全球:非殖民化时代的苏联和东欧》,作者:詹姆斯·马克、保罗·贝茨、阿莱娜·阿拉姆吉尔、帕姆斯特·阿波尔、埃里克·伯顿、博格丹·c·雅各布、斯特菲·马隆和拉迪娜·乌蒂季奇

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
George Roberts
{"title":"书评:《社会主义走向全球:非殖民化时代的苏联和东欧》,作者:詹姆斯·马克、保罗·贝茨、阿莱娜·阿拉姆吉尔、帕姆斯特·阿波尔、埃里克·伯顿、博格丹·c·雅各布、斯特菲·马隆和拉迪娜·乌<e:1>蒂季奇","authors":"George Roberts","doi":"10.1177/00220094231184092c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"instinctively suspicious of legal restrictions on trade unions, citing both their right to free association and the hostility of the bourgeois judiciary. Comrades in Conflict also ably draws out the personal element of the disagreement, the antipathy that trade union leaders and trade union MPs had towards the ‘academic, middle-class’ proponents of In Place of Strife – such as Wilson and Castle – straying onto their turf, in addition to the misogynistic treatment of Castle herself. The fundamental disagreement at the heart of the conflict over In Place of Strife, however, regards the nature of industrial conflict. For Castle and Wilson, unconstitutional and unofficial strikes reflected disorder, a disorder generated first and foremost by irresponsible trade unions. For Jones, Scanlon, et al., these strikes were primarily the product of reckless and intransigent employers. Some engagement with how workers on the shop floor understood these issues and reacted to this legislation would have enabled Comrades in Conflict to weigh in more directly on which of those positions most closely approximated reality. This remains, however, a valuable volume that deepens our understanding of policy formation and power under the post-war settlement.","PeriodicalId":51640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: <i>Socialism Goes Global: The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the Age of Decolonization</i> by James Mark, Paul Betts, Alena Alamgir, Péter Apor, Eric Burton, Bogdan C. Iacob, Steffi Marung and Radina Vučetić\",\"authors\":\"George Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00220094231184092c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"instinctively suspicious of legal restrictions on trade unions, citing both their right to free association and the hostility of the bourgeois judiciary. Comrades in Conflict also ably draws out the personal element of the disagreement, the antipathy that trade union leaders and trade union MPs had towards the ‘academic, middle-class’ proponents of In Place of Strife – such as Wilson and Castle – straying onto their turf, in addition to the misogynistic treatment of Castle herself. The fundamental disagreement at the heart of the conflict over In Place of Strife, however, regards the nature of industrial conflict. For Castle and Wilson, unconstitutional and unofficial strikes reflected disorder, a disorder generated first and foremost by irresponsible trade unions. For Jones, Scanlon, et al., these strikes were primarily the product of reckless and intransigent employers. Some engagement with how workers on the shop floor understood these issues and reacted to this legislation would have enabled Comrades in Conflict to weigh in more directly on which of those positions most closely approximated reality. This remains, however, a valuable volume that deepens our understanding of policy formation and power under the post-war settlement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094231184092c\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094231184092c","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Socialism Goes Global: The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the Age of Decolonization by James Mark, Paul Betts, Alena Alamgir, Péter Apor, Eric Burton, Bogdan C. Iacob, Steffi Marung and Radina Vučetić
instinctively suspicious of legal restrictions on trade unions, citing both their right to free association and the hostility of the bourgeois judiciary. Comrades in Conflict also ably draws out the personal element of the disagreement, the antipathy that trade union leaders and trade union MPs had towards the ‘academic, middle-class’ proponents of In Place of Strife – such as Wilson and Castle – straying onto their turf, in addition to the misogynistic treatment of Castle herself. The fundamental disagreement at the heart of the conflict over In Place of Strife, however, regards the nature of industrial conflict. For Castle and Wilson, unconstitutional and unofficial strikes reflected disorder, a disorder generated first and foremost by irresponsible trade unions. For Jones, Scanlon, et al., these strikes were primarily the product of reckless and intransigent employers. Some engagement with how workers on the shop floor understood these issues and reacted to this legislation would have enabled Comrades in Conflict to weigh in more directly on which of those positions most closely approximated reality. This remains, however, a valuable volume that deepens our understanding of policy formation and power under the post-war settlement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信