{"title":"脚部击打方式和节奏对男性跑步者髌骨股骨关节应力的影响","authors":"Zhen Wei , Xihe Hou , Yujie Qi , Lin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to determine the effect of foot strike patterns and cadences in male runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Biomechanics lab.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>20 male runners with PFP were instructed to randomly complete six running conditions (three cadence conditions in rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) or forefoot strike (FFS)) under a preferred running speed.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes were peak knee joint and moment, and secondary outcomes were patellofemoral joint stress.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Running with increased cadence has a lower flexion angle (P = 0.027, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.45), lower extension moment (P = 0.011, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.29), lower internal rotation moment (P = 0.040, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.17), lower patellofemoral stress (P = 0.029, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.52) than preferred cadence. FFS running performed significantly lower flexion angle (P = 0.003, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.39), lower extension moment (P < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.91), lower adduction moment (P = 0.020, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.25) lower patellofemoral stress (P < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.81) than RFS running for all cadence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Preliminary findings provide new perspectives for male runners with PFP to unload patellofemoral joint stress in managing PFP through the combination of the FFS pattern and increased cadence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"65 ","pages":"Pages 1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001323/pdfft?md5=45285481c3240ff9e8db7f9b3148b0e6&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X23001323-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of foot strike patterns and cadences on patellofemoral joint stress in male runners with patellofemoral pain\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Wei , Xihe Hou , Yujie Qi , Lin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to determine the effect of foot strike patterns and cadences in male runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Biomechanics lab.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>20 male runners with PFP were instructed to randomly complete six running conditions (three cadence conditions in rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) or forefoot strike (FFS)) under a preferred running speed.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes were peak knee joint and moment, and secondary outcomes were patellofemoral joint stress.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Running with increased cadence has a lower flexion angle (P = 0.027, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.45), lower extension moment (P = 0.011, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.29), lower internal rotation moment (P = 0.040, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.17), lower patellofemoral stress (P = 0.029, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.52) than preferred cadence. FFS running performed significantly lower flexion angle (P = 0.003, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.39), lower extension moment (P < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.91), lower adduction moment (P = 0.020, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.25) lower patellofemoral stress (P < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.81) than RFS running for all cadence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Preliminary findings provide new perspectives for male runners with PFP to unload patellofemoral joint stress in managing PFP through the combination of the FFS pattern and increased cadence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001323/pdfft?md5=45285481c3240ff9e8db7f9b3148b0e6&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X23001323-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001323\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of foot strike patterns and cadences on patellofemoral joint stress in male runners with patellofemoral pain
Objectives
This study aimed to determine the effect of foot strike patterns and cadences in male runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP).
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
Biomechanics lab.
Methods
20 male runners with PFP were instructed to randomly complete six running conditions (three cadence conditions in rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) or forefoot strike (FFS)) under a preferred running speed.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcomes were peak knee joint and moment, and secondary outcomes were patellofemoral joint stress.
Results
Running with increased cadence has a lower flexion angle (P = 0.027, η2 = 0.45), lower extension moment (P = 0.011, η2 = 0.29), lower internal rotation moment (P = 0.040, η2 = 0.17), lower patellofemoral stress (P = 0.029, η2 = 0.52) than preferred cadence. FFS running performed significantly lower flexion angle (P = 0.003, η2 = 0.39), lower extension moment (P < 0.001, η2 = 0.91), lower adduction moment (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.25) lower patellofemoral stress (P < 0.001, η2 = 0.81) than RFS running for all cadence.
Conclusions
Preliminary findings provide new perspectives for male runners with PFP to unload patellofemoral joint stress in managing PFP through the combination of the FFS pattern and increased cadence.
期刊介绍:
Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science.
The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.