罗斯巴德的惩罚理论是报应性的吗?

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Roczniki Filozoficzne Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.18290/rf23713.1

Łukasz Dominiak

{"title":"罗斯巴德的惩罚理论是报应性的吗?","authors":"Łukasz Dominiak","doi":"10.18290/rf23713.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Murray Rothbard claims that it is “evident that our theory of proportional punishment—that people may be punished by losing their rights to the extent that they have invaded the rights of others—is frankly a retributive theory of punishment, a ‘tooth (or two teeth) for a tooth’ theory.” The present paper argues that it is not. The role that Rothbard assigns for victims in determining punishment justifies classifying his theory of punishment as corrective rather than retributive, for vesting victims with rights over punishment defeats the retributive justice requirement that criminals are punished solely because they deserve it and in accordance with their respective deserts. Instead of giving offenders what they objectively deserve, the Rothbardian theory of punishment allows victims to seek compensation in various forms, including revenge.","PeriodicalId":35732,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Filozoficzne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Rothbardian Theory of Punishment Retributive?\",\"authors\":\"Łukasz Dominiak\",\"doi\":\"10.18290/rf23713.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Murray Rothbard claims that it is “evident that our theory of proportional punishment—that people may be punished by losing their rights to the extent that they have invaded the rights of others—is frankly a retributive theory of punishment, a ‘tooth (or two teeth) for a tooth’ theory.” The present paper argues that it is not. The role that Rothbard assigns for victims in determining punishment justifies classifying his theory of punishment as corrective rather than retributive, for vesting victims with rights over punishment defeats the retributive justice requirement that criminals are punished solely because they deserve it and in accordance with their respective deserts. Instead of giving offenders what they objectively deserve, the Rothbardian theory of punishment allows victims to seek compensation in various forms, including revenge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Roczniki Filozoficzne\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Roczniki Filozoficzne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18290/rf23713.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Filozoficzne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18290/rf23713.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

穆瑞·罗斯巴德声称，“很明显，我们的比例惩罚理论——人们可能因侵犯他人权利而被剥夺权利——坦率地说，是一种报应性的惩罚理论，一种‘以牙还牙’的理论。”本文认为并非如此。罗斯巴德在决定惩罚时赋予受害者的角色，证明了将他的惩罚理论归类为纠正性而非报应性，因为赋予受害者对惩罚的权利，击败了惩罚正义的要求，即罪犯受到惩罚仅仅是因为他们应该受到惩罚，并且符合他们各自的应得。罗斯巴德的惩罚理论没有给罪犯客观上应得的惩罚，而是允许受害者以各种形式寻求补偿，包括报复。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Is the Rothbardian Theory of Punishment Retributive?

Murray Rothbard claims that it is “evident that our theory of proportional punishment—that people may be punished by losing their rights to the extent that they have invaded the rights of others—is frankly a retributive theory of punishment, a ‘tooth (or two teeth) for a tooth’ theory.” The present paper argues that it is not. The role that Rothbard assigns for victims in determining punishment justifies classifying his theory of punishment as corrective rather than retributive, for vesting victims with rights over punishment defeats the retributive justice requirement that criminals are punished solely because they deserve it and in accordance with their respective deserts. Instead of giving offenders what they objectively deserve, the Rothbardian theory of punishment allows victims to seek compensation in various forms, including revenge.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Roczniki Filozoficzne Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Annals of Philosophy is one of the oldest philosophical journals in Poland (since 1948). It is published four times per year in both the online and traditional ways. The journal aims to publish the best original research papers in philosophy, as well as translations, reviews, accounts and polemics.