(Un)评分:讲师在新自由主义大学系统中减轻分数负面影响的指南

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Adriana Brook
{"title":"(Un)评分:讲师在新自由主义大学系统中减轻分数负面影响的指南","authors":"Adriana Brook","doi":"10.7202/1106315ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Critics of the neoliberal university argue that grading undermines student learning. In this article, I survey the literature in order to ascertain whether such critiques are supported by pedagogical research. Investigating the relationship between grading and motivation, feedback, and autonomy, respectively, I conclude that grades most often do undercut learning. I explore the implications for instructors at Canadian universities, suggesting that abandoning grades is currently neither feasible nor best for students. I propose pragmatic adaptations to common grading practices that better promote learning and conclude that the implementation of less grade-centric assessment strategies is not only the best way to support student learning but also a way to challenge and mitigate the influences of neoliberal ideology in higher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":44124,"journal":{"name":"McGill Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Un)making the grade: An instructor’s guide to mitigating the negative impacts of grades within a neoliberal university system\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Brook\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1106315ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Critics of the neoliberal university argue that grading undermines student learning. In this article, I survey the literature in order to ascertain whether such critiques are supported by pedagogical research. Investigating the relationship between grading and motivation, feedback, and autonomy, respectively, I conclude that grades most often do undercut learning. I explore the implications for instructors at Canadian universities, suggesting that abandoning grades is currently neither feasible nor best for students. I propose pragmatic adaptations to common grading practices that better promote learning and conclude that the implementation of less grade-centric assessment strategies is not only the best way to support student learning but also a way to challenge and mitigate the influences of neoliberal ideology in higher education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"McGill Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"McGill Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1106315ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1106315ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新自由主义大学的批评者认为,评分会破坏学生的学习。在这篇文章中,我对文献进行了调查,以确定这些批评是否得到了教育学研究的支持。分别调查了评分与动机、反馈和自主之间的关系,我得出结论,评分通常会削弱学习。我探讨了这对加拿大大学教师的影响,认为放弃分数目前对学生来说既不可行,也不是最好的。我建议对常见的评分做法进行务实的调整,以更好地促进学习,并得出结论,实施不那么以成绩为中心的评估策略不仅是支持学生学习的最佳方式,也是挑战和减轻新自由主义意识形态在高等教育中的影响的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
(Un)making the grade: An instructor’s guide to mitigating the negative impacts of grades within a neoliberal university system

Critics of the neoliberal university argue that grading undermines student learning. In this article, I survey the literature in order to ascertain whether such critiques are supported by pedagogical research. Investigating the relationship between grading and motivation, feedback, and autonomy, respectively, I conclude that grades most often do undercut learning. I explore the implications for instructors at Canadian universities, suggesting that abandoning grades is currently neither feasible nor best for students. I propose pragmatic adaptations to common grading practices that better promote learning and conclude that the implementation of less grade-centric assessment strategies is not only the best way to support student learning but also a way to challenge and mitigate the influences of neoliberal ideology in higher education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
McGill Journal of Education
McGill Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信