双头鹰标志,俄罗斯帝国徽章和格鲁吉亚王国的地方复制品

Q3 Social Sciences
Eka Avaliani, Tamta Tskhovrebadze
{"title":"双头鹰标志,俄罗斯帝国徽章和格鲁吉亚王国的地方复制品","authors":"Eka Avaliani, Tamta Tskhovrebadze","doi":"10.31578/jss.v8i2.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on iconic symbols of “Eagles” in the Georgian context from the early Antiquity to the Medieval and Modern periods. It explores the implication of the symbol and its functions to establish meaning in the society. The paper explains the process of interaction among meaning, style, content, and receivers, as well as provides a framework to understand how historical memory can serve as a constitutive, relational, and purposive content for collective and state identities. Acknowledging that heritage is a highly political process, susceptible to the needs of power, the research draws on a number of examples to underline that the symbols of the past portrayed in various media legitimate political symbolism in fact represent political standpoint.
 Keywords: eagle, memory, national identity, imperial symbols, symbols of power","PeriodicalId":36372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-Headed Eagle Symbol, The Russian Imperial Emblem and Local Replica in The Kingdom of Georgia\",\"authors\":\"Eka Avaliani, Tamta Tskhovrebadze\",\"doi\":\"10.31578/jss.v8i2.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article focuses on iconic symbols of “Eagles” in the Georgian context from the early Antiquity to the Medieval and Modern periods. It explores the implication of the symbol and its functions to establish meaning in the society. The paper explains the process of interaction among meaning, style, content, and receivers, as well as provides a framework to understand how historical memory can serve as a constitutive, relational, and purposive content for collective and state identities. Acknowledging that heritage is a highly political process, susceptible to the needs of power, the research draws on a number of examples to underline that the symbols of the past portrayed in various media legitimate political symbolism in fact represent political standpoint.
 Keywords: eagle, memory, national identity, imperial symbols, symbols of power\",\"PeriodicalId\":36372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31578/jss.v8i2.145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31578/jss.v8i2.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重点研究了从上古早期到中世纪和现代时期格鲁吉亚背景下的“鹰”的标志性符号。探讨了符号的意蕴及其在社会中建立意义的功能。本文解释了意义、风格、内容和接受者之间相互作用的过程,并提供了一个框架来理解历史记忆如何作为集体和国家身份的构成性、关系性和目的性内容。承认遗产是一个高度政治化的过程,容易受到权力需求的影响,该研究利用了一些例子来强调,在各种媒体中描绘的过去的符号,合法的政治象征主义实际上代表了政治立场。关键词:鹰,记忆,民族认同,帝国符号,权力符号
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double-Headed Eagle Symbol, The Russian Imperial Emblem and Local Replica in The Kingdom of Georgia
The article focuses on iconic symbols of “Eagles” in the Georgian context from the early Antiquity to the Medieval and Modern periods. It explores the implication of the symbol and its functions to establish meaning in the society. The paper explains the process of interaction among meaning, style, content, and receivers, as well as provides a framework to understand how historical memory can serve as a constitutive, relational, and purposive content for collective and state identities. Acknowledging that heritage is a highly political process, susceptible to the needs of power, the research draws on a number of examples to underline that the symbols of the past portrayed in various media legitimate political symbolism in fact represent political standpoint. Keywords: eagle, memory, national identity, imperial symbols, symbols of power
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Sciences
Journal of Social Sciences Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信