{"title":"“问题情境”作为法医评估工具:参数评估与内部一致性检查","authors":"O.A. Rusakovskaya","doi":"10.17759/psylaw.2023130208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In order to standardize &ldquo;The Problem situations&rdquo; as a forensic instrument, a study was conducted with the aim to identify the parameters of the assessment and to check the internal consistency of the instrument. The sample consisted of 47 subjects who underwent inpatient forensic psychiatric examination in connection with the decision on the issue of changing their civil status, with schizophrenia, intellectual disabilities and organic mental disorders. Primary and secondary evaluation parameters were identified by the content analysis. Correlation analysis was used to check the internal consistency of the instrument. On the example of the first problematic situation, the procedure for identifying secondary parameters is shown. It has been established that the correlation analysis between the secondary parameters belonging to three categories: causes &mdash; consequences &mdash; solutions, confirms the results of a qualitative analysis and biclustering. Significant correlations between semantic similar secondary parameters that are related to different problem situations were revealed. A conclusion was made about the internal consistency of the instrument and about its assumed construct validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":426732,"journal":{"name":"Psihologiâ i Pravo","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Problem Situations” as a Forensic Assessment Instrument: Assessing Parameters and Checking Internal Consistency\",\"authors\":\"O.A. Rusakovskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.17759/psylaw.2023130208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p style=\\\"text-align: justify;\\\">In order to standardize &ldquo;The Problem situations&rdquo; as a forensic instrument, a study was conducted with the aim to identify the parameters of the assessment and to check the internal consistency of the instrument. The sample consisted of 47 subjects who underwent inpatient forensic psychiatric examination in connection with the decision on the issue of changing their civil status, with schizophrenia, intellectual disabilities and organic mental disorders. Primary and secondary evaluation parameters were identified by the content analysis. Correlation analysis was used to check the internal consistency of the instrument. On the example of the first problematic situation, the procedure for identifying secondary parameters is shown. It has been established that the correlation analysis between the secondary parameters belonging to three categories: causes &mdash; consequences &mdash; solutions, confirms the results of a qualitative analysis and biclustering. Significant correlations between semantic similar secondary parameters that are related to different problem situations were revealed. A conclusion was made about the internal consistency of the instrument and about its assumed construct validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":426732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psihologiâ i Pravo\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psihologiâ i Pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2023130208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologiâ i Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2023130208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
p style=" font - family:宋体;">为了规范“作为一种法医工具,进行了一项研究,目的是确定评估的参数并检查该工具的内部一致性。样本包括47名受试者,他们接受了与改变其公民身份问题的决定有关的住院法医精神病学检查,患有精神分裂症、智力残疾和器质性精神障碍。通过含量分析确定了主要评价参数和次要评价参数。采用相关分析检验仪器的内部一致性。在第一个问题情况的示例中,给出了确定次要参数的过程。建立了三大类次级参数的相关分析:原因;后果,终止,解决方案,确认了定性分析和聚类的结果。发现不同问题情境下语义相似的次参数之间存在显著的相关性。对该工具的内部一致性和假设结构效度做出了结论。
“Problem Situations” as a Forensic Assessment Instrument: Assessing Parameters and Checking Internal Consistency
In order to standardize “The Problem situations” as a forensic instrument, a study was conducted with the aim to identify the parameters of the assessment and to check the internal consistency of the instrument. The sample consisted of 47 subjects who underwent inpatient forensic psychiatric examination in connection with the decision on the issue of changing their civil status, with schizophrenia, intellectual disabilities and organic mental disorders. Primary and secondary evaluation parameters were identified by the content analysis. Correlation analysis was used to check the internal consistency of the instrument. On the example of the first problematic situation, the procedure for identifying secondary parameters is shown. It has been established that the correlation analysis between the secondary parameters belonging to three categories: causes — consequences — solutions, confirms the results of a qualitative analysis and biclustering. Significant correlations between semantic similar secondary parameters that are related to different problem situations were revealed. A conclusion was made about the internal consistency of the instrument and about its assumed construct validity.