埃塞俄比亚中部高地选定地点奶牛及其饲主的布鲁氏菌病血清流行率

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Temesgen Kassa, Beksisa Urge, Gezahegn Mamo
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚中部高地选定地点奶牛及其饲主的布鲁氏菌病血清流行率","authors":"Temesgen Kassa, Beksisa Urge, Gezahegn Mamo","doi":"10.1080/09712119.2023.2188919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2019 to May 2020 to determine the seroprevalence and identify potential risk factors of brucellosis in dairy cows and owners. Purposive sampling was performed in the respective farms and kebeles to screen recent cases of abortion. The overall seroprevalence of bovine and human brucellosis was 0.61% (95%CI:0.016–2.09) and 1.21% (95%CI:0.032–4.27) respectively using combined RBPT and CFT tests. Late stage of abortion (OR = 14.74, p = 0.0002), retained fetal membrane (OR = 32.74, p = 0.006), market-based stock replacement (OR = 16.55, p = 0.002), and presence of parturition pen (OR = 11.511, p = 0.027) was found to be significantly associated with seropositivity for Brucella infection in dairy cattle. Human housing (OR = 1.8, p = 0.002), contact with aborted fetus (OR = 21.19, p = 0.017), and drinking raw milk from aborted (OR = 5.72, 0.019) and retained fetal membrane (OR = 4.22, p = 0.029) cows all had a significant influence on human brucellosis seropositivity. A structured interview question was administered to 284 respondents. Accordingly, most respondents had no knowledge of bovine brucellosis and their zoonotic effects (93.3%) in contrast most of them drink raw milk. Implementation of a test and slaughter strategy with compensation is recommended with this low prevalence. In the case of human brucellosis, implementing one health approach framework should be practiced.","PeriodicalId":15030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seroprevalence of brucellosis in dairy animals and their owners in selected sites, central highlands of Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Temesgen Kassa, Beksisa Urge, Gezahegn Mamo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09712119.2023.2188919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2019 to May 2020 to determine the seroprevalence and identify potential risk factors of brucellosis in dairy cows and owners. Purposive sampling was performed in the respective farms and kebeles to screen recent cases of abortion. The overall seroprevalence of bovine and human brucellosis was 0.61% (95%CI:0.016–2.09) and 1.21% (95%CI:0.032–4.27) respectively using combined RBPT and CFT tests. Late stage of abortion (OR = 14.74, p = 0.0002), retained fetal membrane (OR = 32.74, p = 0.006), market-based stock replacement (OR = 16.55, p = 0.002), and presence of parturition pen (OR = 11.511, p = 0.027) was found to be significantly associated with seropositivity for Brucella infection in dairy cattle. Human housing (OR = 1.8, p = 0.002), contact with aborted fetus (OR = 21.19, p = 0.017), and drinking raw milk from aborted (OR = 5.72, 0.019) and retained fetal membrane (OR = 4.22, p = 0.029) cows all had a significant influence on human brucellosis seropositivity. A structured interview question was administered to 284 respondents. Accordingly, most respondents had no knowledge of bovine brucellosis and their zoonotic effects (93.3%) in contrast most of them drink raw milk. Implementation of a test and slaughter strategy with compensation is recommended with this low prevalence. In the case of human brucellosis, implementing one health approach framework should be practiced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2023.2188919\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2023.2188919","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年12月至2020年5月进行了一项横断面研究,以确定奶牛和奶牛主人的布鲁氏菌病血清阳性率并确定潜在危险因素。在各自的农场和卫生院进行了有目的的抽样,以筛查最近的堕胎病例。采用RBPT和CFT联合检测,牛和人布鲁氏菌病的总血清阳性率分别为0.61% (95%CI: 0.016-2.09)和1.21% (95%CI: 0.032-4.27)。流产后期(OR = 14.74, p = 0.0002)、胎膜残留(OR = 32.74, p = 0.006)、市场置换(OR = 16.55, p = 0.002)和产房栏存在(OR = 11.511, p = 0.027)与奶牛布鲁氏菌感染血清阳性显著相关。人的居住环境(OR = 1.8, p = 0.002)、接触流产胎(OR = 21.19, p = 0.017)、饮用流产牛(OR = 5.72, 0.019)和残留胎膜(OR = 4.22, p = 0.029)的生乳对人布鲁氏菌病血清阳性均有显著影响。对284名受访者进行了结构化访谈。因此,大多数应答者不了解牛布鲁氏菌病及其人畜共患效应(93.3%),相比之下,大多数应答者饮用生奶。鉴于这种低流行率,建议实施带有补偿的检测和屠宰策略。就人类布鲁氏菌病而言,应实行一种卫生方针框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seroprevalence of brucellosis in dairy animals and their owners in selected sites, central highlands of Ethiopia
A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2019 to May 2020 to determine the seroprevalence and identify potential risk factors of brucellosis in dairy cows and owners. Purposive sampling was performed in the respective farms and kebeles to screen recent cases of abortion. The overall seroprevalence of bovine and human brucellosis was 0.61% (95%CI:0.016–2.09) and 1.21% (95%CI:0.032–4.27) respectively using combined RBPT and CFT tests. Late stage of abortion (OR = 14.74, p = 0.0002), retained fetal membrane (OR = 32.74, p = 0.006), market-based stock replacement (OR = 16.55, p = 0.002), and presence of parturition pen (OR = 11.511, p = 0.027) was found to be significantly associated with seropositivity for Brucella infection in dairy cattle. Human housing (OR = 1.8, p = 0.002), contact with aborted fetus (OR = 21.19, p = 0.017), and drinking raw milk from aborted (OR = 5.72, 0.019) and retained fetal membrane (OR = 4.22, p = 0.029) cows all had a significant influence on human brucellosis seropositivity. A structured interview question was administered to 284 respondents. Accordingly, most respondents had no knowledge of bovine brucellosis and their zoonotic effects (93.3%) in contrast most of them drink raw milk. Implementation of a test and slaughter strategy with compensation is recommended with this low prevalence. In the case of human brucellosis, implementing one health approach framework should be practiced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Animal Research
Journal of Applied Animal Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Animal Research (JAAR) is an international open access journal. JAAR publishes articles related to animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, reproduction, immunology, pathology and animal products. Papers on cows and dairy cattle, small ruminants, horses, pigs and companion animals are very welcome, as well as research involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species. In addition, manuscripts involving research in other species that is directly related to animal production will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信