选举裁判官作为预防其可能的越轨行为的措施:法律传统的批判性分析

Yuri N. Tuganov
{"title":"选举裁判官作为预防其可能的越轨行为的措施:法律传统的批判性分析","authors":"Yuri N. Tuganov","doi":"10.31857/s102694520027234-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the electability of justices of the peace, which is regarded as a cross-cutting value maxim of the justice of the peace since 1864 and is positioned as a basic component. Clarification of the degree of influence of the election of judges on the prevention of deviant behavior of individual holders of judicial power is carried out using the methodology of historical and legal analysis of the legal terms of the Judicial Statutes of the Russian Empire of November 20, 1864 and extrapolation of their results in the Russian Federation. The monoconceptual vision of elections as a procedure for granting judicial powers to candidates for justices of the peace of the XIX - early XX century is supplemented by the authors’ argument, according to which this procedure was in fact a five-stage technology for completing judicial posts by appointment. The decision on the personalities from the list of candidates compiled by the leader of the nobility and approved by the governor was taken by vote. But voting itself is not an election.","PeriodicalId":433320,"journal":{"name":"Государство и право","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Election of magistrates as a preventive measure their possible deviant behavior: critical analysis of the legal tradition\",\"authors\":\"Yuri N. Tuganov\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s102694520027234-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the electability of justices of the peace, which is regarded as a cross-cutting value maxim of the justice of the peace since 1864 and is positioned as a basic component. Clarification of the degree of influence of the election of judges on the prevention of deviant behavior of individual holders of judicial power is carried out using the methodology of historical and legal analysis of the legal terms of the Judicial Statutes of the Russian Empire of November 20, 1864 and extrapolation of their results in the Russian Federation. The monoconceptual vision of elections as a procedure for granting judicial powers to candidates for justices of the peace of the XIX - early XX century is supplemented by the authors’ argument, according to which this procedure was in fact a five-stage technology for completing judicial posts by appointment. The decision on the personalities from the list of candidates compiled by the leader of the nobility and approved by the governor was taken by vote. But voting itself is not an election.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Государство и право\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Государство и право\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520027234-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Государство и право","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520027234-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治安法官的可选性是自1864年以来治安法官贯穿始终的价值准则,并被定位为治安法官的基本组成部分。通过对1864年11月20日《俄罗斯帝国司法法规》的法律条款进行历史和法律分析,并对其在俄罗斯联邦的结果进行外推,明确了法官选举对防止司法权力个体持有人越轨行为的影响程度。将选举视为授予19世纪至20世纪初治安法官候选人司法权的程序的单一概念的观点得到了作者的论点的补充,根据作者的论点,这一程序实际上是通过任命完成司法职位的五阶段技术。贵族领袖从候选人名单中挑选人选,并经总督批准,人选由投票决定。但是投票本身并不是选举。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Election of magistrates as a preventive measure their possible deviant behavior: critical analysis of the legal tradition
The article examines the electability of justices of the peace, which is regarded as a cross-cutting value maxim of the justice of the peace since 1864 and is positioned as a basic component. Clarification of the degree of influence of the election of judges on the prevention of deviant behavior of individual holders of judicial power is carried out using the methodology of historical and legal analysis of the legal terms of the Judicial Statutes of the Russian Empire of November 20, 1864 and extrapolation of their results in the Russian Federation. The monoconceptual vision of elections as a procedure for granting judicial powers to candidates for justices of the peace of the XIX - early XX century is supplemented by the authors’ argument, according to which this procedure was in fact a five-stage technology for completing judicial posts by appointment. The decision on the personalities from the list of candidates compiled by the leader of the nobility and approved by the governor was taken by vote. But voting itself is not an election.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信