{"title":"工程教育中的探究式学习:挪威方法","authors":"Khanh-Quang Tran","doi":"10.18178/ijlt.9.3.246-250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inquiry of research-based learning in the form of groupwork can easily end up being less than expected. It is because groupwork assessment is dealing with process and can be far trickier than assessing a team’s work dealing with product. This study aims to identify an assessment approach for effective inquiry-based learning in engineering education. For this purpose, four different perspectives were presented and discussed in combination with key constraints to implementing research-based learning. The perspectives include student reflection, collegial reflection, personal reflection, and literature. It was suggested that a combined method of continuous and qualitative assessment might be the most plausible.","PeriodicalId":93451,"journal":{"name":"International journal of learning and teaching","volume":"301 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inquiry-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Norwegian Approach\",\"authors\":\"Khanh-Quang Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.18178/ijlt.9.3.246-250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inquiry of research-based learning in the form of groupwork can easily end up being less than expected. It is because groupwork assessment is dealing with process and can be far trickier than assessing a team’s work dealing with product. This study aims to identify an assessment approach for effective inquiry-based learning in engineering education. For this purpose, four different perspectives were presented and discussed in combination with key constraints to implementing research-based learning. The perspectives include student reflection, collegial reflection, personal reflection, and literature. It was suggested that a combined method of continuous and qualitative assessment might be the most plausible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of learning and teaching\",\"volume\":\"301 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of learning and teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.9.3.246-250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of learning and teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.9.3.246-250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inquiry-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Norwegian Approach
Inquiry of research-based learning in the form of groupwork can easily end up being less than expected. It is because groupwork assessment is dealing with process and can be far trickier than assessing a team’s work dealing with product. This study aims to identify an assessment approach for effective inquiry-based learning in engineering education. For this purpose, four different perspectives were presented and discussed in combination with key constraints to implementing research-based learning. The perspectives include student reflection, collegial reflection, personal reflection, and literature. It was suggested that a combined method of continuous and qualitative assessment might be the most plausible.