重度中枢性腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者神经根沉降征(SedSign)的相关危险因素分析

IF 1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Haiming Yu, Yunfeng Han, Rui Zhang, Chu Sun, Mingda Wang, Bo Yue, Kaiping Chou, Bin Li, Nan Zhang
{"title":"重度中枢性腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者神经根沉降征(SedSign)的相关危险因素分析","authors":"Haiming Yu, Yunfeng Han, Rui Zhang, Chu Sun, Mingda Wang, Bo Yue, Kaiping Chou, Bin Li, Nan Zhang","doi":"10.1080/26895293.2023.2172460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The incidence of nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) was evaluated to explore potential pathogenesis in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In a total of 209 patients with severe LSS, 290 intervertebral levels were narrow, among which 248 showed a positive SedSign, giving a prevalence of 85.52%. Those levels with a positive SedSign were further analyzed relative to those with a negative SedSign. There was no significant difference between the two groups for the cross-sectional area (CSA) or the posteroanterior diameter (PAD). In contrast, there was a significant difference between the groups for the grade of degenerative facet joint (DFJ) (p < 0.05), the thickness of ligamentum flavum (TLF) (p < 0.01), and the cross-sectional area difference (CSAD) (p < 0.01). In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify associated factors. The area under the ROC curve for PAD was 0.608 (p < 0.05), for DFJ was 0.634 (p < 0.05), for TLF was 0.74 (p < 0.01), and for CSAD was 0.911 (p < 0.01). In summary, a positive SedSign has notable advantages in assisting with the diagnosis of severe LSS. Compression of the dural sac from the rear may be the main risk factors of a positive SedSign.","PeriodicalId":48478,"journal":{"name":"All Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative risk factors of nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) in patients with severe central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)\",\"authors\":\"Haiming Yu, Yunfeng Han, Rui Zhang, Chu Sun, Mingda Wang, Bo Yue, Kaiping Chou, Bin Li, Nan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26895293.2023.2172460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The incidence of nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) was evaluated to explore potential pathogenesis in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In a total of 209 patients with severe LSS, 290 intervertebral levels were narrow, among which 248 showed a positive SedSign, giving a prevalence of 85.52%. Those levels with a positive SedSign were further analyzed relative to those with a negative SedSign. There was no significant difference between the two groups for the cross-sectional area (CSA) or the posteroanterior diameter (PAD). In contrast, there was a significant difference between the groups for the grade of degenerative facet joint (DFJ) (p < 0.05), the thickness of ligamentum flavum (TLF) (p < 0.01), and the cross-sectional area difference (CSAD) (p < 0.01). In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify associated factors. The area under the ROC curve for PAD was 0.608 (p < 0.05), for DFJ was 0.634 (p < 0.05), for TLF was 0.74 (p < 0.01), and for CSAD was 0.911 (p < 0.01). In summary, a positive SedSign has notable advantages in assisting with the diagnosis of severe LSS. Compression of the dural sac from the rear may be the main risk factors of a positive SedSign.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"All Life\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"All Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26895293.2023.2172460\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"All Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26895293.2023.2172460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估神经根沉降征(SedSign)的发生率,探讨严重腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的潜在发病机制。209例重度LSS患者中,290例椎间节段狭窄,其中248例SedSign阳性,患病率为85.52%。与SedSign阴性的水平相比,进一步分析SedSign阳性的水平。两组间的横截面积(CSA)和后前径(PAD)无显著差异。两组间退行性关节突关节(DFJ)等级(p < 0.05)、黄韧带(TLF)厚度(p < 0.01)、横截面积差(CSAD) (p < 0.01)差异均有统计学意义。此外,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定相关因素。PAD的ROC曲线下面积为0.608 (p < 0.05), DFJ为0.634 (p < 0.05), TLF为0.74 (p < 0.01), CSAD为0.911 (p < 0.01)。综上所述,SedSign阳性在协助诊断严重LSS方面具有显著优势。硬膜囊后部受压可能是SedSign阳性的主要危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative risk factors of nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) in patients with severe central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)
The incidence of nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) was evaluated to explore potential pathogenesis in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In a total of 209 patients with severe LSS, 290 intervertebral levels were narrow, among which 248 showed a positive SedSign, giving a prevalence of 85.52%. Those levels with a positive SedSign were further analyzed relative to those with a negative SedSign. There was no significant difference between the two groups for the cross-sectional area (CSA) or the posteroanterior diameter (PAD). In contrast, there was a significant difference between the groups for the grade of degenerative facet joint (DFJ) (p < 0.05), the thickness of ligamentum flavum (TLF) (p < 0.01), and the cross-sectional area difference (CSAD) (p < 0.01). In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify associated factors. The area under the ROC curve for PAD was 0.608 (p < 0.05), for DFJ was 0.634 (p < 0.05), for TLF was 0.74 (p < 0.01), and for CSAD was 0.911 (p < 0.01). In summary, a positive SedSign has notable advantages in assisting with the diagnosis of severe LSS. Compression of the dural sac from the rear may be the main risk factors of a positive SedSign.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
All Life
All Life MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信