74“残疾儿童的牙科护理不被认为是必要的护理”:父母和牙医的观点

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Magdalena Jaworski, Hugo Cadorel, Annie Janvier, Marie-Ève Asselin
{"title":"74“残疾儿童的牙科护理不被认为是必要的护理”:父母和牙医的观点","authors":"Magdalena Jaworski, Hugo Cadorel, Annie Janvier, Marie-Ève Asselin","doi":"10.1093/pch/pxad055.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Oral health is often overlooked in the medical care for children with disabilities. While recommendations exist, these take little account of the daily reality of the main stakeholders: parents and dentists. Objectives Our goal was to explore the perspectives of parents and dentists regarding dental care for children with special needs, and contrast their lived experience with recommended best practices. Design/Methods 14 participants were recruited from a tertiary paediatric health centre to participate in semi-structured interviews: 9 parents of children with special needs (cerebral palsy, craniofacial anomalies, autism spectrum disorder) and 5 paediatric dentists. Interviews were conducted virtually in 2021. The participants were asked about oral health prevention, accessibility and treatment. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative methodology. Results Based on a thematic analysis of the content of the interviews, we identified several issues encountered by our participants in the context of the dental health of children with special needs. There were mainly issues of accessibility: ‘I work in the field and yet it was so difficult to find a dentist for my own child with disabilities’; financial barriers: ‘His dental needs are not covered because they are deemed aesthetic’; and geographical: ‘I am lucky, I have to drive 30 minutes to her appointments, but others need to drive for hours’. Parents also described difficulties in prevention: ‘I didn’t know how to care for his teeth; I used my own common sense’. The dentists emphasized the importance of communication: ‘I wish dentists were a part of the multidisciplinary healthcare team’. Also, sensitive questions regarding ethical issues, such as protective stabilization and general anesthesia were candidly answered by the majority of interviewees who accepted these practices as essential: ‘It [stabilization] is not easy to accept, but we know it is necessary’, and ‘I prefer getting the treatments done in one appointment [necessitating anaesthesia]’. These practices, in contrast, are deemed more problematic in the medical literature. Conclusion Dental care and prevention is essential since oral and dental problems can cause significant pain and distress. There is a significant gap between what “ought to be done” and the reality of families. Despite this, several practical recommendations emanated from the interviews that can be turned into actionable items in practice.","PeriodicalId":19730,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrics & child health","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"74 “Dental Care for Children with Disability Is Not Considered Essential Care”: Perspectives of Parents and Dentists\",\"authors\":\"Magdalena Jaworski, Hugo Cadorel, Annie Janvier, Marie-Ève Asselin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pch/pxad055.074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Oral health is often overlooked in the medical care for children with disabilities. While recommendations exist, these take little account of the daily reality of the main stakeholders: parents and dentists. Objectives Our goal was to explore the perspectives of parents and dentists regarding dental care for children with special needs, and contrast their lived experience with recommended best practices. Design/Methods 14 participants were recruited from a tertiary paediatric health centre to participate in semi-structured interviews: 9 parents of children with special needs (cerebral palsy, craniofacial anomalies, autism spectrum disorder) and 5 paediatric dentists. Interviews were conducted virtually in 2021. The participants were asked about oral health prevention, accessibility and treatment. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative methodology. Results Based on a thematic analysis of the content of the interviews, we identified several issues encountered by our participants in the context of the dental health of children with special needs. There were mainly issues of accessibility: ‘I work in the field and yet it was so difficult to find a dentist for my own child with disabilities’; financial barriers: ‘His dental needs are not covered because they are deemed aesthetic’; and geographical: ‘I am lucky, I have to drive 30 minutes to her appointments, but others need to drive for hours’. Parents also described difficulties in prevention: ‘I didn’t know how to care for his teeth; I used my own common sense’. The dentists emphasized the importance of communication: ‘I wish dentists were a part of the multidisciplinary healthcare team’. Also, sensitive questions regarding ethical issues, such as protective stabilization and general anesthesia were candidly answered by the majority of interviewees who accepted these practices as essential: ‘It [stabilization] is not easy to accept, but we know it is necessary’, and ‘I prefer getting the treatments done in one appointment [necessitating anaesthesia]’. These practices, in contrast, are deemed more problematic in the medical literature. Conclusion Dental care and prevention is essential since oral and dental problems can cause significant pain and distress. There is a significant gap between what “ought to be done” and the reality of families. Despite this, several practical recommendations emanated from the interviews that can be turned into actionable items in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatrics & child health\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatrics & child health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxad055.074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrics & child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxad055.074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景在残疾儿童的医疗护理中,口腔健康往往被忽视。虽然存在建议,但这些建议很少考虑到主要利益相关者的日常现实:父母和牙医。我们的目的是探讨父母和牙医对特殊需要儿童牙科护理的看法,并将他们的生活经验与推荐的最佳做法进行对比。设计/方法从一家三级儿科保健中心招募14名参与者参加半结构化访谈:9名有特殊需要(脑瘫、颅面异常、自闭症谱系障碍)儿童的父母和5名儿科牙医。访谈是在2021年进行的。参与者被问及口腔健康的预防、可及性和治疗。访谈采用定性方法进行分析。结果根据对访谈内容的专题分析,我们确定了参与者在有特殊需要的儿童牙齿健康方面遇到的几个问题。主要是可及性问题:“我在这个领域工作,但为我自己的残疾孩子找牙医太难了。”经济障碍:“他的牙科需求没有被支付,因为他们认为这是审美”;地理位置:“我很幸运,我必须开车30分钟去她的诊所,但其他人需要开车几个小时。”家长们还描述了预防的困难:“我不知道如何照顾他的牙齿;我用了自己的常识。”牙医们强调沟通的重要性:“我希望牙医是多学科医疗团队的一员。”此外,关于道德问题的敏感问题,如保护性稳定和全身麻醉,大多数接受这些做法的受访者坦率地回答:“它(稳定)不容易接受,但我们知道它是必要的”,“我更喜欢在一次预约中完成治疗(必要的麻醉)”。相比之下,这些做法在医学文献中被认为更有问题。结论:口腔和牙齿问题会引起严重的疼痛和痛苦,因此牙齿保健和预防是必不可少的。“应该做的”与家庭的现实之间存在着巨大的差距。尽管如此,从访谈中产生了一些实际的建议,这些建议可以在实践中变成可执行的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
74 “Dental Care for Children with Disability Is Not Considered Essential Care”: Perspectives of Parents and Dentists
Abstract Background Oral health is often overlooked in the medical care for children with disabilities. While recommendations exist, these take little account of the daily reality of the main stakeholders: parents and dentists. Objectives Our goal was to explore the perspectives of parents and dentists regarding dental care for children with special needs, and contrast their lived experience with recommended best practices. Design/Methods 14 participants were recruited from a tertiary paediatric health centre to participate in semi-structured interviews: 9 parents of children with special needs (cerebral palsy, craniofacial anomalies, autism spectrum disorder) and 5 paediatric dentists. Interviews were conducted virtually in 2021. The participants were asked about oral health prevention, accessibility and treatment. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative methodology. Results Based on a thematic analysis of the content of the interviews, we identified several issues encountered by our participants in the context of the dental health of children with special needs. There were mainly issues of accessibility: ‘I work in the field and yet it was so difficult to find a dentist for my own child with disabilities’; financial barriers: ‘His dental needs are not covered because they are deemed aesthetic’; and geographical: ‘I am lucky, I have to drive 30 minutes to her appointments, but others need to drive for hours’. Parents also described difficulties in prevention: ‘I didn’t know how to care for his teeth; I used my own common sense’. The dentists emphasized the importance of communication: ‘I wish dentists were a part of the multidisciplinary healthcare team’. Also, sensitive questions regarding ethical issues, such as protective stabilization and general anesthesia were candidly answered by the majority of interviewees who accepted these practices as essential: ‘It [stabilization] is not easy to accept, but we know it is necessary’, and ‘I prefer getting the treatments done in one appointment [necessitating anaesthesia]’. These practices, in contrast, are deemed more problematic in the medical literature. Conclusion Dental care and prevention is essential since oral and dental problems can cause significant pain and distress. There is a significant gap between what “ought to be done” and the reality of families. Despite this, several practical recommendations emanated from the interviews that can be turned into actionable items in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Paediatrics & child health
Paediatrics & child health 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Paediatrics & Child Health (PCH) is the official journal of the Canadian Paediatric Society, and the only peer-reviewed paediatric journal in Canada. Its mission is to advocate for the health and well-being of all Canadian children and youth and to educate child and youth health professionals across the country. PCH reaches 8,000 paediatricians, family physicians and other child and youth health professionals, as well as ministers and officials in various levels of government who are involved with child and youth health policy in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信