{"title":"2013年6月(SDE)的回声","authors":"MARCO ANTONIO PERRUSO","doi":"10.17771/pucrio.ddcis.64176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay reviews June 2013, ten years later, from two specific angles: the Brazilian historical path, which has always oscillated dialectically between two social forces that continuosly reposition themselves: liberalism and nationalism; and the political and cultural agency o four popular classes, which so often reacted to the two diferente styles of class domination defined by these social forces – one based on the market, more excluding and conservative, the other based on the State, able to include subalternly actors from the world of work. I follow, therefore, the way which goes through the rise, fall and rebirth of Lulism. In this context, June 2013 is a phenomenon further rooted in the world of exploitation and oppression of work that tends to structure our social, spatial, rural, racial, gender inequality – notably in relation those excluded from the Lula social compromise. I conclude by registering that June did no have the strenght to decisively change the dominant intra-burgeois political dialectic in our country.","PeriodicalId":485654,"journal":{"name":"Desigualdade & diversidade","volume":"446 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ECOS DE(SDE) JUNHO DE 2013\",\"authors\":\"MARCO ANTONIO PERRUSO\",\"doi\":\"10.17771/pucrio.ddcis.64176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay reviews June 2013, ten years later, from two specific angles: the Brazilian historical path, which has always oscillated dialectically between two social forces that continuosly reposition themselves: liberalism and nationalism; and the political and cultural agency o four popular classes, which so often reacted to the two diferente styles of class domination defined by these social forces – one based on the market, more excluding and conservative, the other based on the State, able to include subalternly actors from the world of work. I follow, therefore, the way which goes through the rise, fall and rebirth of Lulism. In this context, June 2013 is a phenomenon further rooted in the world of exploitation and oppression of work that tends to structure our social, spatial, rural, racial, gender inequality – notably in relation those excluded from the Lula social compromise. I conclude by registering that June did no have the strenght to decisively change the dominant intra-burgeois political dialectic in our country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":485654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Desigualdade & diversidade\",\"volume\":\"446 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Desigualdade & diversidade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17771/pucrio.ddcis.64176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Desigualdade & diversidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17771/pucrio.ddcis.64176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay reviews June 2013, ten years later, from two specific angles: the Brazilian historical path, which has always oscillated dialectically between two social forces that continuosly reposition themselves: liberalism and nationalism; and the political and cultural agency o four popular classes, which so often reacted to the two diferente styles of class domination defined by these social forces – one based on the market, more excluding and conservative, the other based on the State, able to include subalternly actors from the world of work. I follow, therefore, the way which goes through the rise, fall and rebirth of Lulism. In this context, June 2013 is a phenomenon further rooted in the world of exploitation and oppression of work that tends to structure our social, spatial, rural, racial, gender inequality – notably in relation those excluded from the Lula social compromise. I conclude by registering that June did no have the strenght to decisively change the dominant intra-burgeois political dialectic in our country.