2013年抗议周期:社会运动和抗议研究领域对争议对象分析的贡献

MARCELO KUNRATH SILVA
{"title":"2013年抗议周期:社会运动和抗议研究领域对争议对象分析的贡献","authors":"MARCELO KUNRATH SILVA","doi":"10.17771/pucrio.ddcis.64184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to present arguments and concepts that help understanding the 2013 cycle of protests from the field of social movements and protest studies. This is considered to be a relevant contribution, since a significant portion of the 2013 interprepations and analyzes do not dialogue with the knowledge accumulated by this field of study. Guided by this objective, the paper seeks to avoid the controversy related to attemps to atribute a “meaning of 2013”, which is highlighted by the public debate. On the contrary, it is proposed tha heterogeneity, ambiguity conflict and dynamism should be treated as elements that make up 2013 cycle of protests and make it impossible to assign a “meaning” to it.","PeriodicalId":485654,"journal":{"name":"Desigualdade & diversidade","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CICLO DE PROTESTOS DE 2013: CONTRIBUIÇÕES DO CAMPO DE ESTUDOS DE MOVIMENTOS SOCIAIS E PROTESTO PARA A ANÁLISE DE UM OBJETO DE DISPUTA\",\"authors\":\"MARCELO KUNRATH SILVA\",\"doi\":\"10.17771/pucrio.ddcis.64184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to present arguments and concepts that help understanding the 2013 cycle of protests from the field of social movements and protest studies. This is considered to be a relevant contribution, since a significant portion of the 2013 interprepations and analyzes do not dialogue with the knowledge accumulated by this field of study. Guided by this objective, the paper seeks to avoid the controversy related to attemps to atribute a “meaning of 2013”, which is highlighted by the public debate. On the contrary, it is proposed tha heterogeneity, ambiguity conflict and dynamism should be treated as elements that make up 2013 cycle of protests and make it impossible to assign a “meaning” to it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":485654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Desigualdade & diversidade\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Desigualdade & diversidade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17771/pucrio.ddcis.64184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Desigualdade & diversidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17771/pucrio.ddcis.64184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CICLO DE PROTESTOS DE 2013: CONTRIBUIÇÕES DO CAMPO DE ESTUDOS DE MOVIMENTOS SOCIAIS E PROTESTO PARA A ANÁLISE DE UM OBJETO DE DISPUTA
This paper aims to present arguments and concepts that help understanding the 2013 cycle of protests from the field of social movements and protest studies. This is considered to be a relevant contribution, since a significant portion of the 2013 interprepations and analyzes do not dialogue with the knowledge accumulated by this field of study. Guided by this objective, the paper seeks to avoid the controversy related to attemps to atribute a “meaning of 2013”, which is highlighted by the public debate. On the contrary, it is proposed tha heterogeneity, ambiguity conflict and dynamism should be treated as elements that make up 2013 cycle of protests and make it impossible to assign a “meaning” to it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信