重新审视课间休息:一项了解课间休息政策变化期间身体活动的混合方法研究

Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1080/19325037.2023.2253874
Erin K. Howie, Kristi L. Perryman
{"title":"重新审视课间休息:一项了解课间休息政策变化期间身体活动的混合方法研究","authors":"Erin K. Howie, Kristi L. Perryman","doi":"10.1080/19325037.2023.2253874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground Recess is an integral part of a comprehensive school physical activity program. Immediately prior to the pandemic, state legislation doubled the amount of required recess, creating an opportunity to better understand how policies and practices influence recess.Purpose To describe changes to recess due to COVID-19 and extended recess legislation and to quantify student physical activity during recess following these changes.Methods This mixed-method study was conducted in Spring 2021 in four elementary schools. Recess physical activity was measured using waist-worn accelerometers, recess was observed, and researchers conducted interviews with teachers and principals.Results Females spent 41.7% (95%CI: 38.2, 44.5) and males spent 47.9% (95%CI: 44.6, 51.2) of recess in accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (n = 164). Participants (n = 13) discussed increased supervision, classroom separation on the playground, and benefits of extended recess.Discussion States should consider extending recess requirements but need to consider options for scheduling and indoor recess. Recess continues to be a key physical activity opportunity during school.Translation to Health Education Practice Health Educators considering changes to recess policies and practices may want to consider scheduling of recess including class integration, options for indoor recess, and professional development for recess supervision to help maximize the benefits of recess. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Human subjects approval statementLetters of support were obtained from all school principals and activities were approved by university Institutional Review Board and school districts when necessarySupplementary dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2023.2253874.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Arkansas Honors College [N/A]; University of Arkansas - Provost Collaborative Grant [N/A].","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Recess: A Mixed-Methods Study to Understand Physical Activity During Changing Recess Policies\",\"authors\":\"Erin K. Howie, Kristi L. Perryman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19325037.2023.2253874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTBackground Recess is an integral part of a comprehensive school physical activity program. Immediately prior to the pandemic, state legislation doubled the amount of required recess, creating an opportunity to better understand how policies and practices influence recess.Purpose To describe changes to recess due to COVID-19 and extended recess legislation and to quantify student physical activity during recess following these changes.Methods This mixed-method study was conducted in Spring 2021 in four elementary schools. Recess physical activity was measured using waist-worn accelerometers, recess was observed, and researchers conducted interviews with teachers and principals.Results Females spent 41.7% (95%CI: 38.2, 44.5) and males spent 47.9% (95%CI: 44.6, 51.2) of recess in accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (n = 164). Participants (n = 13) discussed increased supervision, classroom separation on the playground, and benefits of extended recess.Discussion States should consider extending recess requirements but need to consider options for scheduling and indoor recess. Recess continues to be a key physical activity opportunity during school.Translation to Health Education Practice Health Educators considering changes to recess policies and practices may want to consider scheduling of recess including class integration, options for indoor recess, and professional development for recess supervision to help maximize the benefits of recess. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Human subjects approval statementLetters of support were obtained from all school principals and activities were approved by university Institutional Review Board and school districts when necessarySupplementary dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2023.2253874.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Arkansas Honors College [N/A]; University of Arkansas - Provost Collaborative Grant [N/A].\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2023.2253874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2023.2253874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】课间休息是学校综合体育活动的重要组成部分。就在大流行之前,州立法将所需的休会时间增加了一倍,这为更好地了解政策和做法如何影响休会创造了机会。目的描述因COVID-19和延长休息立法而导致的休息变化,并量化这些变化后学生在休息期间的身体活动。方法采用混合方法,于2021年春季在四所小学开展研究。课间体力活动采用腰戴式加速度计测量,课间活动进行观察,研究人员对教师和校长进行了访谈。结果在加速度计测量的中高强度体力活动中,女性的休息时间为41.7% (95%CI: 38.2, 44.5),男性为47.9% (95%CI: 44.6, 51.2)。参与者(n = 13)讨论了加强监督、在操场上分开教室以及延长课间休息的好处。各国应考虑延长休息要求,但需要考虑安排时间和室内休息的备选办法。课间休息仍然是学校期间重要的体育活动机会。考虑改变课间政策和实践的健康教育工作者可能需要考虑课间安排,包括班级整合、室内课间选择和课间监督的专业发展,以帮助最大限度地发挥课间的效益。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。人类受试者批准声明支持信获得了所有学校校长的支持,必要时活动得到了大学机构审查委员会和学区的批准。补充数据本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2023.2253874.Additional上在线获取。阿肯色大学教务长合作基金[N/A]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Revisiting Recess: A Mixed-Methods Study to Understand Physical Activity During Changing Recess Policies
ABSTRACTBackground Recess is an integral part of a comprehensive school physical activity program. Immediately prior to the pandemic, state legislation doubled the amount of required recess, creating an opportunity to better understand how policies and practices influence recess.Purpose To describe changes to recess due to COVID-19 and extended recess legislation and to quantify student physical activity during recess following these changes.Methods This mixed-method study was conducted in Spring 2021 in four elementary schools. Recess physical activity was measured using waist-worn accelerometers, recess was observed, and researchers conducted interviews with teachers and principals.Results Females spent 41.7% (95%CI: 38.2, 44.5) and males spent 47.9% (95%CI: 44.6, 51.2) of recess in accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (n = 164). Participants (n = 13) discussed increased supervision, classroom separation on the playground, and benefits of extended recess.Discussion States should consider extending recess requirements but need to consider options for scheduling and indoor recess. Recess continues to be a key physical activity opportunity during school.Translation to Health Education Practice Health Educators considering changes to recess policies and practices may want to consider scheduling of recess including class integration, options for indoor recess, and professional development for recess supervision to help maximize the benefits of recess. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Human subjects approval statementLetters of support were obtained from all school principals and activities were approved by university Institutional Review Board and school districts when necessarySupplementary dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2023.2253874.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Arkansas Honors College [N/A]; University of Arkansas - Provost Collaborative Grant [N/A].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信