Kaian Shahateet, Francisco Navarro, Thorsten Seehaus, Johannes J. Fürst, Matthias Braun
{"title":"利用不同冰厚数据集估算南极半岛冰流量","authors":"Kaian Shahateet, Francisco Navarro, Thorsten Seehaus, Johannes J. Fürst, Matthias Braun","doi":"10.1017/aog.2023.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet (APIS) has become a significant contributor to sea-level rise over recent decades. Accurately estimating the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS is crucial to quantify the mass balance of the Antarctic Peninsula. We here compute the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS north of 70 ${^\\circ }$ S for the five most widely used ice-thickness reconstructions, using a common surface velocity field and a common set of flux gates, so the differences in ice discharge can be solely attributed to the differences in ice thickness at the flux gates. The total volumetric ice discharge for 2015–2017 ranges within 45–141 km 3 a −1 , depending on the ice-thickness model, with a mean of 87 ± 44 km 3 a −1 . The substantial differences between the ice-discharge results, and a multi-model normalized root-mean-squared deviation of 0.91 for the whole data set, reveal large differences and inconsistencies between the ice-thickness models, giving an indication of the large uncertainty in the current ice-discharge estimates for the APIS. This manifests a fundamental problem of the region: the scarcity of appropriate ice-thickness measurements and the difficulty of the current models to reconstruct the ice-thickness distribution in this complex region.","PeriodicalId":8211,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Glaciology","volume":"9 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating ice discharge of the Antarctic Peninsula using different ice-thickness datasets\",\"authors\":\"Kaian Shahateet, Francisco Navarro, Thorsten Seehaus, Johannes J. Fürst, Matthias Braun\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/aog.2023.67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet (APIS) has become a significant contributor to sea-level rise over recent decades. Accurately estimating the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS is crucial to quantify the mass balance of the Antarctic Peninsula. We here compute the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS north of 70 ${^\\\\circ }$ S for the five most widely used ice-thickness reconstructions, using a common surface velocity field and a common set of flux gates, so the differences in ice discharge can be solely attributed to the differences in ice thickness at the flux gates. The total volumetric ice discharge for 2015–2017 ranges within 45–141 km 3 a −1 , depending on the ice-thickness model, with a mean of 87 ± 44 km 3 a −1 . The substantial differences between the ice-discharge results, and a multi-model normalized root-mean-squared deviation of 0.91 for the whole data set, reveal large differences and inconsistencies between the ice-thickness models, giving an indication of the large uncertainty in the current ice-discharge estimates for the APIS. This manifests a fundamental problem of the region: the scarcity of appropriate ice-thickness measurements and the difficulty of the current models to reconstruct the ice-thickness distribution in this complex region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Glaciology\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Glaciology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.67\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Glaciology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.67","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近几十年来,南极半岛冰盖(APIS)已成为海平面上升的重要贡献者。准确估算南极冰原出口冰川的冰流量对量化南极半岛的物质平衡至关重要。在此,我们使用一个共同的表面速度场和一组共同的通量门,计算了在70 ${^\circ}$ S以北的五个最广泛使用的冰厚重建的api出口冰川的冰流量,因此冰流量的差异可以完全归因于通量门处冰厚的差异。根据不同的冰厚模式,2015-2017年的总冰流量在45-141 km 3 a−1之间,平均为87±44 km 3 a−1。冰流量结果之间的巨大差异,以及整个数据集的多模型归一化均方根偏差为0.91,表明冰厚度模型之间存在很大差异和不一致性,表明目前api冰流量估计存在很大的不确定性。这反映了该地区的一个根本问题:缺乏适当的冰厚测量,现有模型难以重建这一复杂地区的冰厚分布。
Estimating ice discharge of the Antarctic Peninsula using different ice-thickness datasets
Abstract The Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet (APIS) has become a significant contributor to sea-level rise over recent decades. Accurately estimating the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS is crucial to quantify the mass balance of the Antarctic Peninsula. We here compute the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS north of 70 ${^\circ }$ S for the five most widely used ice-thickness reconstructions, using a common surface velocity field and a common set of flux gates, so the differences in ice discharge can be solely attributed to the differences in ice thickness at the flux gates. The total volumetric ice discharge for 2015–2017 ranges within 45–141 km 3 a −1 , depending on the ice-thickness model, with a mean of 87 ± 44 km 3 a −1 . The substantial differences between the ice-discharge results, and a multi-model normalized root-mean-squared deviation of 0.91 for the whole data set, reveal large differences and inconsistencies between the ice-thickness models, giving an indication of the large uncertainty in the current ice-discharge estimates for the APIS. This manifests a fundamental problem of the region: the scarcity of appropriate ice-thickness measurements and the difficulty of the current models to reconstruct the ice-thickness distribution in this complex region.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Glaciology publishes original scientific articles and letters in selected aspects of glaciology-the study of ice. Each issue of the Annals is thematic, focussing on a specific subject. The Council of the International Glaciological Society welcomes proposals for thematic issues from the glaciological community. Once a theme is approved, the Council appoints an Associate Chief Editor and a team of Scientific Editors to handle the submission, peer review and publication of papers.