{"title":"乌克兰基辅孕妇前置胎盘的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"V.O. Berestovyi, O.V. Zelinska, N.V. Gerevich, D.O. Govsieiev","doi":"10.15574/sp.2023.133.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Placenta previa is a significant obstetric problem with elevated morbidity and mortality rates for both mother and fetus. The risks associated with placenta previa underscore the necessity for comprehensive treatment and timely intervention to mitigate adverse outcomes. Purpose - to conduct a retrospective analysis of the impact of obstetric-gynecological factors on the prediction of placenta previa occurrence and its influence on perinatal outcomes. Materials and methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on cases of placenta previa between 2018 and 2022. The study included 22491 deliveries, of which 65 (0.29%) cases were registered as placenta previa. Data from delivery records of 374 patients without placenta previa were used for comparison. The following variables were evaluated for all patients: maternal age, characteristics of the menstrual cycle, gravidity, parity, history of cesarean sections, gestational age at delivery, method of delivery, blood loss during delivery, length of postpartum hospitalization, birth weight, gender of the newborn, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes. Gynecological intervention histories, including curettage/hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, and cervical treatment, as well as obstetric pathologies, such as cesarean section, ectopic pregnancy, instrumental abortions, missed pregnancies, and assisted reproductive technologies in the last pregnancy, were examined. Results. Multifactorial analysis revealed four significant risk factors. The risk of placenta previa was found to increase with advanced maternal age (p<0.001), OR=1.14 (95% CI 1.07-1.20), and the presence of previous cesarean sections (p<0.001), OR=5.51 (95% CI 2.73-11.1), while a history of previous deliveries reduced the risk (p<0.001), OR=0.24 (95% CI 0.15-0.40). Instrumental abortions increased the risk of placenta previa (p=0.001), OR=2.14 (95% CI 1.20-3.81). Newborns in the placenta previa group had lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes and lower birth weight. Conclusions. The obtained results emphasize the importance of considering risk factors in assessing placenta previa occurrence during antenatal monitoring and can contribute to improving obstetric and perinatal care for women. However, the morphological and functional basis of placenta previa remains unknown and requires further study. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of participating institution. No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.","PeriodicalId":34724,"journal":{"name":"Suchasna pediatriia Ukrayina","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for placenta previa among pregnant women of Kyiv, Ukraine: a retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"V.O. Berestovyi, O.V. Zelinska, N.V. Gerevich, D.O. Govsieiev\",\"doi\":\"10.15574/sp.2023.133.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Placenta previa is a significant obstetric problem with elevated morbidity and mortality rates for both mother and fetus. The risks associated with placenta previa underscore the necessity for comprehensive treatment and timely intervention to mitigate adverse outcomes. Purpose - to conduct a retrospective analysis of the impact of obstetric-gynecological factors on the prediction of placenta previa occurrence and its influence on perinatal outcomes. Materials and methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on cases of placenta previa between 2018 and 2022. The study included 22491 deliveries, of which 65 (0.29%) cases were registered as placenta previa. Data from delivery records of 374 patients without placenta previa were used for comparison. The following variables were evaluated for all patients: maternal age, characteristics of the menstrual cycle, gravidity, parity, history of cesarean sections, gestational age at delivery, method of delivery, blood loss during delivery, length of postpartum hospitalization, birth weight, gender of the newborn, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes. Gynecological intervention histories, including curettage/hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, and cervical treatment, as well as obstetric pathologies, such as cesarean section, ectopic pregnancy, instrumental abortions, missed pregnancies, and assisted reproductive technologies in the last pregnancy, were examined. Results. Multifactorial analysis revealed four significant risk factors. The risk of placenta previa was found to increase with advanced maternal age (p<0.001), OR=1.14 (95% CI 1.07-1.20), and the presence of previous cesarean sections (p<0.001), OR=5.51 (95% CI 2.73-11.1), while a history of previous deliveries reduced the risk (p<0.001), OR=0.24 (95% CI 0.15-0.40). Instrumental abortions increased the risk of placenta previa (p=0.001), OR=2.14 (95% CI 1.20-3.81). Newborns in the placenta previa group had lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes and lower birth weight. Conclusions. The obtained results emphasize the importance of considering risk factors in assessing placenta previa occurrence during antenatal monitoring and can contribute to improving obstetric and perinatal care for women. However, the morphological and functional basis of placenta previa remains unknown and requires further study. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of participating institution. No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suchasna pediatriia Ukrayina\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suchasna pediatriia Ukrayina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15574/sp.2023.133.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suchasna pediatriia Ukrayina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15574/sp.2023.133.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前置胎盘是一个重要的产科问题,对母亲和胎儿的发病率和死亡率都很高。前置胎盘的相关风险强调了综合治疗和及时干预以减轻不良后果的必要性。目的:回顾性分析妇产科因素对前置胎盘发生预测的影响及其对围产儿结局的影响。材料和方法。对2018年至2022年的前置胎盘病例进行了回顾性队列研究。该研究包括22491例分娩,其中65例(0.29%)登记为前置胎盘。采用374例无前置胎盘患者的分娩记录进行比较。对所有患者的以下变量进行评估:产妇年龄、月经周期特征、妊娠、胎次、剖宫产史、分娩时胎龄、分娩方式、分娩时出血量、产后住院时间、出生体重、新生儿性别、1分钟和5分钟时Apgar评分。检查妇科干预史,包括刮宫/宫腔镜、腹腔镜和宫颈治疗,以及上次妊娠的产科病理,如剖宫产、异位妊娠、器械流产、漏孕和辅助生殖技术。结果。多因素分析揭示了四个显著的危险因素。发现前置胎盘的风险随着产妇年龄的增加而增加(p<0.001), OR=1.14 (95% CI 1.07-1.20),以及既往剖宫产(p<0.001), OR=5.51 (95% CI 2.73-11.1),而既往分娩史降低了风险(p<0.001), OR=0.24 (95% CI 0.15-0.40)。人工流产增加前置胎盘的风险(p=0.001), OR=2.14 (95% CI 1.20-3.81)。前置胎盘组新生儿在1分钟和5分钟时Apgar评分较低,出生体重较低。结论。所获得的结果强调了在产前监测中评估前置胎盘发生时考虑危险因素的重要性,并有助于改善妇女的产科和围产期护理。然而,前置胎盘的形态和功能基础尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。这项研究是按照《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则进行的。本研究方案经参与单位当地伦理委员会批准。作者未声明存在利益冲突。
Risk factors for placenta previa among pregnant women of Kyiv, Ukraine: a retrospective cohort study
Placenta previa is a significant obstetric problem with elevated morbidity and mortality rates for both mother and fetus. The risks associated with placenta previa underscore the necessity for comprehensive treatment and timely intervention to mitigate adverse outcomes. Purpose - to conduct a retrospective analysis of the impact of obstetric-gynecological factors on the prediction of placenta previa occurrence and its influence on perinatal outcomes. Materials and methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on cases of placenta previa between 2018 and 2022. The study included 22491 deliveries, of which 65 (0.29%) cases were registered as placenta previa. Data from delivery records of 374 patients without placenta previa were used for comparison. The following variables were evaluated for all patients: maternal age, characteristics of the menstrual cycle, gravidity, parity, history of cesarean sections, gestational age at delivery, method of delivery, blood loss during delivery, length of postpartum hospitalization, birth weight, gender of the newborn, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes. Gynecological intervention histories, including curettage/hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, and cervical treatment, as well as obstetric pathologies, such as cesarean section, ectopic pregnancy, instrumental abortions, missed pregnancies, and assisted reproductive technologies in the last pregnancy, were examined. Results. Multifactorial analysis revealed four significant risk factors. The risk of placenta previa was found to increase with advanced maternal age (p<0.001), OR=1.14 (95% CI 1.07-1.20), and the presence of previous cesarean sections (p<0.001), OR=5.51 (95% CI 2.73-11.1), while a history of previous deliveries reduced the risk (p<0.001), OR=0.24 (95% CI 0.15-0.40). Instrumental abortions increased the risk of placenta previa (p=0.001), OR=2.14 (95% CI 1.20-3.81). Newborns in the placenta previa group had lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes and lower birth weight. Conclusions. The obtained results emphasize the importance of considering risk factors in assessing placenta previa occurrence during antenatal monitoring and can contribute to improving obstetric and perinatal care for women. However, the morphological and functional basis of placenta previa remains unknown and requires further study. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of participating institution. No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.