探索 186Os/188Os 精度屏障:DROsS 参考材料的新推荐值以及对混合 1011 和 1012 Ω 放大器阵列的评估

IF 2.7 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Pedro Waterton, Sarah Woodland, Graham Pearson, Simon Hansen Serre, Kristoffer Szilas
{"title":"探索 186Os/188Os 精度屏障:DROsS 参考材料的新推荐值以及对混合 1011 和 1012 Ω 放大器阵列的评估","authors":"Pedro Waterton,&nbsp;Sarah Woodland,&nbsp;Graham Pearson,&nbsp;Simon Hansen Serre,&nbsp;Kristoffer Szilas","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present high precision negative ion thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (N-TIMS) Os isotope measurement results for the DROsS isotope reference material (iCRM), to investigate the limits on the precision of TIMS-based <sup>186</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os results. We used analytical conditions previously highlighted to optimise precision, present a new flexible data processing protocol, and measured <sup>184</sup>Os intensities on a Faraday Cup equipped with an amplifier using a 10<sup>12</sup> Ω resistor. Despite a measurement procedure that minimised uncertainty contributions from counting statistics and Johnson-Nyquist noise, the intermediate measurement precision of our approach does not significantly improve on previous high precision Os isotope measurements, with the exception of <sup>184</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os. This is probably due to uncertainties in measured amplifier gain factors, which are greater when using mixed arrays of 10<sup>11</sup> and 10<sup>12</sup> Ω resistors than when using 10<sup>11</sup> Ω resistors alone, though Faraday Cup deterioration could also contribute. We propose that multi-dynamic Os isotope measurements could largely eliminate both of these uncertainties. Our <sup>184</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os measurement results are the most precise yet, yielding <sup>184</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 0.0013036 ± 0.0000007 (2<i>s</i>, <i>n</i> = 38). Additionally, we average our data with published data to recommend the following isotope ratios for DROsS: <sup>186</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 0.1199319 ± 0.0000024, <sup>187</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 0.1609227 ± 0.0000022, <sup>189</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 1.219709 ± 0.000010, <sup>190</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 1.983793 ± 0.000011.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"109-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggr.12532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probing the 186Os/188Os Precision Barrier: New Recommended Values for the DROsS Reference Material and an Assessment of Mixed 1011 and 1012 Ω Amplifier Arrays\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Waterton,&nbsp;Sarah Woodland,&nbsp;Graham Pearson,&nbsp;Simon Hansen Serre,&nbsp;Kristoffer Szilas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggr.12532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We present high precision negative ion thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (N-TIMS) Os isotope measurement results for the DROsS isotope reference material (iCRM), to investigate the limits on the precision of TIMS-based <sup>186</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os results. We used analytical conditions previously highlighted to optimise precision, present a new flexible data processing protocol, and measured <sup>184</sup>Os intensities on a Faraday Cup equipped with an amplifier using a 10<sup>12</sup> Ω resistor. Despite a measurement procedure that minimised uncertainty contributions from counting statistics and Johnson-Nyquist noise, the intermediate measurement precision of our approach does not significantly improve on previous high precision Os isotope measurements, with the exception of <sup>184</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os. This is probably due to uncertainties in measured amplifier gain factors, which are greater when using mixed arrays of 10<sup>11</sup> and 10<sup>12</sup> Ω resistors than when using 10<sup>11</sup> Ω resistors alone, though Faraday Cup deterioration could also contribute. We propose that multi-dynamic Os isotope measurements could largely eliminate both of these uncertainties. Our <sup>184</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os measurement results are the most precise yet, yielding <sup>184</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 0.0013036 ± 0.0000007 (2<i>s</i>, <i>n</i> = 38). Additionally, we average our data with published data to recommend the following isotope ratios for DROsS: <sup>186</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 0.1199319 ± 0.0000024, <sup>187</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 0.1609227 ± 0.0000022, <sup>189</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 1.219709 ± 0.000010, <sup>190</sup>Os/<sup>188</sup>Os = 1.983793 ± 0.000011.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"109-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggr.12532\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们展示了针对 DROsS 同位素参考材料 (iCRM) 的高精度负离子热电离质谱 (N-TIMS) Os 同位素测量结果,以研究基于 TIMS 的 186Os/188Os 结果的精度限制。 我们使用了之前强调的分析条件来优化精度,提出了一种新的灵活数据处理协议,并在配备了使用 1012 Ω 电阻器的放大器的法拉第杯上测量了 184Os 强度。尽管我们的测量程序最大限度地减少了计数统计和约翰逊-奈奎斯特噪声带来的不确定性,但与以前的高精度 Os 同位素测量相比,我们方法的中间测量精度并没有显著提高,184Os/188Os 除外。这可能是由于测量放大器增益因子的不确定性造成的,与单独使用 1011 Ω 电阻器相比,使用 1011 Ω 和 1012 Ω 电阻器混合阵列时放大器增益因子的不确定性更大,不过法拉第杯劣化也可能是原因之一。我们建议,多动力 Os 同位素测量可以在很大程度上消除这两种不确定性。我们的 184Os/188Os 测量结果是目前最精确的,得出 184Os/188Os = 0.0013036 ± 0.0000007 (2s, n = 38)。此外,我们将我们的数据与已发表的数据进行平均,推荐 DROsS 的同位素比率如下:186Os/188Os = 0.1199319 ± 0.0000024,187Os/188Os = 0.1609227 ± 0.0000022,189Os/188Os = 1.219709 ± 0.000010,190Os/188Os = 1.983793 ± 0.000011。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Probing the 186Os/188Os Precision Barrier: New Recommended Values for the DROsS Reference Material and an Assessment of Mixed 1011 and 1012 Ω Amplifier Arrays

Probing the 186Os/188Os Precision Barrier: New Recommended Values for the DROsS Reference Material and an Assessment of Mixed 1011 and 1012 Ω Amplifier Arrays

We present high precision negative ion thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (N-TIMS) Os isotope measurement results for the DROsS isotope reference material (iCRM), to investigate the limits on the precision of TIMS-based 186Os/188Os results. We used analytical conditions previously highlighted to optimise precision, present a new flexible data processing protocol, and measured 184Os intensities on a Faraday Cup equipped with an amplifier using a 1012 Ω resistor. Despite a measurement procedure that minimised uncertainty contributions from counting statistics and Johnson-Nyquist noise, the intermediate measurement precision of our approach does not significantly improve on previous high precision Os isotope measurements, with the exception of 184Os/188Os. This is probably due to uncertainties in measured amplifier gain factors, which are greater when using mixed arrays of 1011 and 1012 Ω resistors than when using 1011 Ω resistors alone, though Faraday Cup deterioration could also contribute. We propose that multi-dynamic Os isotope measurements could largely eliminate both of these uncertainties. Our 184Os/188Os measurement results are the most precise yet, yielding 184Os/188Os = 0.0013036 ± 0.0000007 (2s, n = 38). Additionally, we average our data with published data to recommend the following isotope ratios for DROsS: 186Os/188Os = 0.1199319 ± 0.0000024, 187Os/188Os = 0.1609227 ± 0.0000022, 189Os/188Os = 1.219709 ± 0.000010, 190Os/188Os = 1.983793 ± 0.000011.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信