{"title":"关键人工智能的厚描述:为多感官方法生成数据资本主义和挑衅","authors":"Caroline E. Schuster, Kristen M. Schuster","doi":"10.1215/2834703x-10734056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article argues that critical AI studies should make a methodological investment in “thick description” to counteract the tendency both within computational design and business settings to presume (or, in the case of start-ups, hope for) a seamless and inevitable journey from data to monetizable domain knowledge and useful services. Perhaps the classic application of that critical data-studies framework is Marion Fourcade and Kevin Healy's influential 2017 essay, “Seeing Like a Market,” which advances a comprehensive account of how value is extracted from data-collection processes. As important as these critiques have been, the apparent inevitability of this assemblage of power, knowledge, and profit arises in part through the metaphor of “sight.” Thick description—especially when combined with a feminist and queer attention to embodiment, materiality, and multisensory experience—can in this respect supplement Fourcade and Healey's critique by revealing unexpected imaginative possibilities built out of social materialities.","PeriodicalId":500906,"journal":{"name":"Critical AI","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thick Description for Critical AI: Generating Data Capitalism and Provocations for a Multisensory Approach\",\"authors\":\"Caroline E. Schuster, Kristen M. Schuster\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/2834703x-10734056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article argues that critical AI studies should make a methodological investment in “thick description” to counteract the tendency both within computational design and business settings to presume (or, in the case of start-ups, hope for) a seamless and inevitable journey from data to monetizable domain knowledge and useful services. Perhaps the classic application of that critical data-studies framework is Marion Fourcade and Kevin Healy's influential 2017 essay, “Seeing Like a Market,” which advances a comprehensive account of how value is extracted from data-collection processes. As important as these critiques have been, the apparent inevitability of this assemblage of power, knowledge, and profit arises in part through the metaphor of “sight.” Thick description—especially when combined with a feminist and queer attention to embodiment, materiality, and multisensory experience—can in this respect supplement Fourcade and Healey's critique by revealing unexpected imaginative possibilities built out of social materialities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical AI\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical AI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703x-10734056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703x-10734056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文认为,关键的人工智能研究应该在方法论上投资于“厚描述”,以抵消计算设计和商业环境中假设(或者,在初创企业的情况下,希望)从数据到可货币化的领域知识和有用服务的无缝和不可避免的旅程的趋势。也许这一关键数据研究框架的经典应用是Marion Fourcade和Kevin Healy在2017年发表的有影响力的文章《像市场一样看》(Seeing Like a Market),这篇文章全面阐述了如何从数据收集过程中提取价值。与这些批评同样重要的是,这种权力、知识和利益的集合显然是不可避免的,部分是通过“视觉”的隐喻产生的。厚重的描述——尤其是当与女权主义者和酷儿对化身、物质性和多感官体验的关注结合在一起时——可以在这方面补充Fourcade和Healey的批判,揭示出基于社会物质性的意想不到的想象可能性。
Thick Description for Critical AI: Generating Data Capitalism and Provocations for a Multisensory Approach
Abstract This article argues that critical AI studies should make a methodological investment in “thick description” to counteract the tendency both within computational design and business settings to presume (or, in the case of start-ups, hope for) a seamless and inevitable journey from data to monetizable domain knowledge and useful services. Perhaps the classic application of that critical data-studies framework is Marion Fourcade and Kevin Healy's influential 2017 essay, “Seeing Like a Market,” which advances a comprehensive account of how value is extracted from data-collection processes. As important as these critiques have been, the apparent inevitability of this assemblage of power, knowledge, and profit arises in part through the metaphor of “sight.” Thick description—especially when combined with a feminist and queer attention to embodiment, materiality, and multisensory experience—can in this respect supplement Fourcade and Healey's critique by revealing unexpected imaginative possibilities built out of social materialities.