拉丁美洲管理和治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)的共识建议

0 PSYCHIATRY
Ricardo Corral, Enrique Bojórquez, Marcelo Cetkovich-Bakmas, Rodrigo Córdoba, Julio Chestaro, Clarissa Gama, Gerardo García Bonetto, Carlos López Jaramillo, Ricardo Alberto Moreno, Bernardo Ng, Edilberto Pena de Leon, Luis Risco, Hernán Silva, Gustavo Vazquez
{"title":"拉丁美洲管理和治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)的共识建议","authors":"Ricardo Corral, Enrique Bojórquez, Marcelo Cetkovich-Bakmas, Rodrigo Córdoba, Julio Chestaro, Clarissa Gama, Gerardo García Bonetto, Carlos López Jaramillo, Ricardo Alberto Moreno, Bernardo Ng, Edilberto Pena de Leon, Luis Risco, Hernán Silva, Gustavo Vazquez","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the abundance of literature on treatment-resistant depression (TRD), there is no universally accepted definition of TRD, and available treatment pathways for the management of TRD vary across the Latin American region, highlighting the need for a uniform definition and treatment principles to optimize the management of TRD in Latin America. Methods: Following a thematic literature review and pre-meeting survey, a Latin America expert panel comprising 14 psychiatrists with clinical experience in managing patients with TRD convened and utilized the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop consensusbased recommendations on the appropriate definition of TRD and principles for its management. Results: The expert panel agreed that ‘treatment-resistant depression’ (TRD) is defined as ‘failure of two drug treatments of adequate doses, for 4–8 weeks duration with adequate adherence, during a major depressive episode’. A stepwise treatment approach should be employed for the management of TRD – treatment strategies can include maximizing dose, switching to a different class, and augmenting or combining treatments. Nonpharmacological treatments, such as electroconvulsive therapy, are also appropriate options for patients with TRD. Conclusion: These consensus recommendations on the operational definition of TRD and approved treatments for its management can be adapted to local contexts in the Latin American countries but should not replace clinical judgement. Individual circumstances and benefit-risk balance should be carefully considered while determining the most appropriate treatment option for patients with TRD.","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latin American Consensus Recommendations for the Management and Treatment of Patients with Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Corral, Enrique Bojórquez, Marcelo Cetkovich-Bakmas, Rodrigo Córdoba, Julio Chestaro, Clarissa Gama, Gerardo García Bonetto, Carlos López Jaramillo, Ricardo Alberto Moreno, Bernardo Ng, Edilberto Pena de Leon, Luis Risco, Hernán Silva, Gustavo Vazquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the abundance of literature on treatment-resistant depression (TRD), there is no universally accepted definition of TRD, and available treatment pathways for the management of TRD vary across the Latin American region, highlighting the need for a uniform definition and treatment principles to optimize the management of TRD in Latin America. Methods: Following a thematic literature review and pre-meeting survey, a Latin America expert panel comprising 14 psychiatrists with clinical experience in managing patients with TRD convened and utilized the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop consensusbased recommendations on the appropriate definition of TRD and principles for its management. Results: The expert panel agreed that ‘treatment-resistant depression’ (TRD) is defined as ‘failure of two drug treatments of adequate doses, for 4–8 weeks duration with adequate adherence, during a major depressive episode’. A stepwise treatment approach should be employed for the management of TRD – treatment strategies can include maximizing dose, switching to a different class, and augmenting or combining treatments. Nonpharmacological treatments, such as electroconvulsive therapy, are also appropriate options for patients with TRD. Conclusion: These consensus recommendations on the operational definition of TRD and approved treatments for its management can be adapted to local contexts in the Latin American countries but should not replace clinical judgement. Individual circumstances and benefit-risk balance should be carefully considered while determining the most appropriate treatment option for patients with TRD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.06.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.06.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有大量关于难治性抑郁症(TRD)的文献,但目前还没有一个普遍接受的TRD定义,而且拉丁美洲地区治疗TRD的可用治疗途径各不相同,因此需要一个统一的定义和治疗原则来优化拉丁美洲的TRD管理。方法:在专题文献综述和会前调查之后,由14名具有管理TRD患者临床经验的精神病学家组成的拉丁美洲专家小组召开会议,并利用RAND/UCLA适当性方法,就TRD的适当定义和管理原则制定了基于共识的建议。结果:专家小组一致认为,“难治性抑郁症”(TRD)的定义是“在重度抑郁症发作期间,两种剂量足够的药物治疗失败,持续时间为4-8周,并有足够的依从性”。治疗TRD应采用分步治疗方法——治疗策略可包括最大剂量、切换到不同的类别、增加或联合治疗。非药物治疗,如电休克治疗,也是TRD患者的适当选择。结论:这些关于TRD的操作定义和批准的治疗方法的共识建议可以适应拉丁美洲国家的当地情况,但不应取代临床判断。在为TRD患者确定最合适的治疗方案时,应仔细考虑个人情况和利益-风险平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Latin American Consensus Recommendations for the Management and Treatment of Patients with Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)
Despite the abundance of literature on treatment-resistant depression (TRD), there is no universally accepted definition of TRD, and available treatment pathways for the management of TRD vary across the Latin American region, highlighting the need for a uniform definition and treatment principles to optimize the management of TRD in Latin America. Methods: Following a thematic literature review and pre-meeting survey, a Latin America expert panel comprising 14 psychiatrists with clinical experience in managing patients with TRD convened and utilized the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop consensusbased recommendations on the appropriate definition of TRD and principles for its management. Results: The expert panel agreed that ‘treatment-resistant depression’ (TRD) is defined as ‘failure of two drug treatments of adequate doses, for 4–8 weeks duration with adequate adherence, during a major depressive episode’. A stepwise treatment approach should be employed for the management of TRD – treatment strategies can include maximizing dose, switching to a different class, and augmenting or combining treatments. Nonpharmacological treatments, such as electroconvulsive therapy, are also appropriate options for patients with TRD. Conclusion: These consensus recommendations on the operational definition of TRD and approved treatments for its management can be adapted to local contexts in the Latin American countries but should not replace clinical judgement. Individual circumstances and benefit-risk balance should be carefully considered while determining the most appropriate treatment option for patients with TRD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信