文献综述:麻风病诊断试验的准确性

Dewa Ayu Agung Dwita Arthaningsih, Ni Putu Tiza Murtia Margha
{"title":"文献综述:麻风病诊断试验的准确性","authors":"Dewa Ayu Agung Dwita Arthaningsih, Ni Putu Tiza Murtia Margha","doi":"10.58811/opsearch.v2i9.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leprosy comes from the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae attacking the skin and peripheral nerves. It triggers some serious symptoms and damage. It can also cause permanent disability if there is no proper treatment. Although the number of cases of leprosy has decreased since the use of multi-drug treatment, but accurate early diagnosis remains difficult. This research analyzes some diagnostic tests and their potential in detecting leprosy. This research is conducted by reviewing scientific articles from 30 online journals in 2019-2023. The findings show that the diagnostic test combines clinical, molecular, serological, and immune response methods for precise detection. PCR technique is effective in detecting M.leprae DNA with high sensitivity in active cases, especially the multibacillary (MB) type. The NDO-LID and PGL-I tests are accurate in the multibacillary (MB) type but not in the paucibacillary (PB). Skin biopsy has identified granulomas and M. leprae bacteria. There must be electrophysiological and ultrasonographic examinations in the detection of nerve damage. Molecular and serological techniques can also support the diagnosis","PeriodicalId":499960,"journal":{"name":"OPSearch American Journal of Open Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature Review: Accuracy Of Diagnostic Tests For Leprosy\",\"authors\":\"Dewa Ayu Agung Dwita Arthaningsih, Ni Putu Tiza Murtia Margha\",\"doi\":\"10.58811/opsearch.v2i9.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Leprosy comes from the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae attacking the skin and peripheral nerves. It triggers some serious symptoms and damage. It can also cause permanent disability if there is no proper treatment. Although the number of cases of leprosy has decreased since the use of multi-drug treatment, but accurate early diagnosis remains difficult. This research analyzes some diagnostic tests and their potential in detecting leprosy. This research is conducted by reviewing scientific articles from 30 online journals in 2019-2023. The findings show that the diagnostic test combines clinical, molecular, serological, and immune response methods for precise detection. PCR technique is effective in detecting M.leprae DNA with high sensitivity in active cases, especially the multibacillary (MB) type. The NDO-LID and PGL-I tests are accurate in the multibacillary (MB) type but not in the paucibacillary (PB). Skin biopsy has identified granulomas and M. leprae bacteria. There must be electrophysiological and ultrasonographic examinations in the detection of nerve damage. Molecular and serological techniques can also support the diagnosis\",\"PeriodicalId\":499960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OPSearch American Journal of Open Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OPSearch American Journal of Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58811/opsearch.v2i9.75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OPSearch American Journal of Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58811/opsearch.v2i9.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

麻风病是由麻风分枝杆菌攻击皮肤和周围神经引起的。它会引发一些严重的症状和损害。如果没有适当的治疗,它还可能导致永久性残疾。虽然自使用多种药物治疗以来,麻风病的病例数有所减少,但准确的早期诊断仍然很困难。本研究分析了一些诊断测试及其在检测麻风方面的潜力。该研究是对2019 ~ 2023年30种网络期刊的科学论文进行分析后得出的结果。研究结果表明,该诊断测试结合了临床、分子、血清学和免疫反应方法,可进行精确检测。PCR技术对麻风分枝杆菌DNA检测具有较高的灵敏度,尤其对多菌型麻风分枝杆菌具有较高的检测效果。NDO-LID和pgl - 1试验在多菌(MB)型中准确,但在少菌(PB)型中不准确。皮肤活检发现肉芽肿和麻风分枝杆菌。神经损伤的检测必须有电生理和超声检查。分子和血清学技术也可以支持诊断
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Literature Review: Accuracy Of Diagnostic Tests For Leprosy
Leprosy comes from the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae attacking the skin and peripheral nerves. It triggers some serious symptoms and damage. It can also cause permanent disability if there is no proper treatment. Although the number of cases of leprosy has decreased since the use of multi-drug treatment, but accurate early diagnosis remains difficult. This research analyzes some diagnostic tests and their potential in detecting leprosy. This research is conducted by reviewing scientific articles from 30 online journals in 2019-2023. The findings show that the diagnostic test combines clinical, molecular, serological, and immune response methods for precise detection. PCR technique is effective in detecting M.leprae DNA with high sensitivity in active cases, especially the multibacillary (MB) type. The NDO-LID and PGL-I tests are accurate in the multibacillary (MB) type but not in the paucibacillary (PB). Skin biopsy has identified granulomas and M. leprae bacteria. There must be electrophysiological and ultrasonographic examinations in the detection of nerve damage. Molecular and serological techniques can also support the diagnosis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信