执政官消失了？关于中世纪早期英格兰使用和不使用格雷戈里大帝登记册的问题

IF 0.7 1区历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES

Early Medieval Europe Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1111/emed.12684

Benjamin Savill

{"title":"执政官消失了？关于中世纪早期英格兰使用和不使用格雷戈里大帝登记册的问题","authors":"Benjamin Savill","doi":"10.1111/emed.12684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article builds upon recent scholarship emphasizing the importance of Gregory the Great's Register as a key text of the Carolingian and post-Carolingian library, exploring by contrast its peculiarly limited reception in England. It first surveys what little evidence we have for its citation by English ecclesiastics (post-c.1000, mostly via Wulfstan); it then examines the single text in a pre-Conquest manuscript usually catalogued as a letter from the Register, showing that this has been reworked as an anonymous admonitio to judges (probably bishops). It concludes by reflecting on the implications of this limited reception for our understanding of the later Anglo-Saxon church – a community otherwise well-invested in Gregory's memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":44508,"journal":{"name":"Early Medieval Europe","volume":"32 1","pages":"106-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emed.12684","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The consul vanishes? On using and not using Gregory the Great's Register in early medieval England\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Savill\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emed.12684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article builds upon recent scholarship emphasizing the importance of Gregory the Great's Register as a key text of the Carolingian and post-Carolingian library, exploring by contrast its peculiarly limited reception in England. It first surveys what little evidence we have for its citation by English ecclesiastics (post-c.1000, mostly via Wulfstan); it then examines the single text in a pre-Conquest manuscript usually catalogued as a letter from the Register, showing that this has been reworked as an anonymous admonitio to judges (probably bishops). It concludes by reflecting on the implications of this limited reception for our understanding of the later Anglo-Saxon church – a community otherwise well-invested in Gregory's memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"106-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emed.12684\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12684\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Medieval Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12684","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

格雷戈里大帝的登记册》是卡洛林王朝和后卡洛林王朝图书馆的重要文本，本文在近期学术研究强调其重要性的基础上，对比探讨了它在英格兰受到的特殊限制。报告首先调查了我们所掌握的英国教会学者引用该书的少量证据（约 1000 年后，主要是通过沃尔夫斯坦）；然后研究了一份征服前手稿中通常被编目为《登记册》信件的单一文本，显示该文本已被改编为对法官（可能是主教）的匿名训诫。最后，文章反思了这种有限的接受对我们了解后期盎格鲁-撒克逊教会的影响--该教会在其他方面对格里高利的记忆非常投入。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The consul vanishes? On using and not using Gregory the Great's Register in early medieval England

This article builds upon recent scholarship emphasizing the importance of Gregory the Great's Register as a key text of the Carolingian and post-Carolingian library, exploring by contrast its peculiarly limited reception in England. It first surveys what little evidence we have for its citation by English ecclesiastics (post-c.1000, mostly via Wulfstan); it then examines the single text in a pre-Conquest manuscript usually catalogued as a letter from the Register, showing that this has been reworked as an anonymous admonitio to judges (probably bishops). It concludes by reflecting on the implications of this limited reception for our understanding of the later Anglo-Saxon church – a community otherwise well-invested in Gregory's memory.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Early Medieval Europe MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Early Medieval Europe provides an indispensable source of information and debate on the history of Europe from the later Roman Empire to the eleventh century. The journal is a thoroughly interdisciplinary forum, encouraging the discussion of archaeology, numismatics, palaeography, diplomatic, literature, onomastics, art history, linguistics and epigraphy, as well as more traditional historical approaches. It covers Europe in its entirety, including material on Iceland, Ireland, the British Isles, Scandinavia and Continental Europe (both west and east).