巴西有机生产监管:对其适应参与式担保制度的说明

Q4 Social Sciences
Eugênio Martins de Sá Resende, Bianca Aparecida Lima Costa, Márcio Gomes Da Silva, Mamen Cuéllar Padilla, Isabel Maria Haro Pérez, Ihedilla Humberta Sinésio Cândido Da Silva
{"title":"巴西有机生产监管:对其适应参与式担保制度的说明","authors":"Eugênio Martins de Sá Resende, Bianca Aparecida Lima Costa, Márcio Gomes Da Silva, Mamen Cuéllar Padilla, Isabel Maria Haro Pérez, Ihedilla Humberta Sinésio Cândido Da Silva","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: analyze the process of public regulation of organic production in Brazil, with a focus on Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) and Social Control Organizations (SCO). Method: The research employed document analysis of reports produced by civil society organizations, content analysis of two webinários on the subject, and conducted 12 interviews with representatives of Brazilian PGSs. Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework encompasses regulations and documents related to organic certification, agroecology, and social construction spaces, as well as current studies on PGS and participatory certification. Results and conclusion: The results presented in this work are part of the research project “Sistemas de confianza, producción ecológica y garantía. Innovaciones sociales al sello oficial en el contexto de los canales cortos de comercialización” developed by the University of Córdoba, Spain, in partnership with a team from the Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil. It is noteworthy that the excess of records, notes and regulatory controls hinder the inclusion and participation of peasants and farmers in organic quality assurance processes. Research implications: This discussion aims to contribute both to an expanded understanding of the social processes established for the regulation of organic production and to provide insights for the reformulation of current regulations in the country. Originality/value: A revision of the methods of verification, traceability, and social control is necessary, adapting them to the diverse socio-cultural realities existing in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":38210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","volume":"32 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulation of Organic Production in Brazil: Notes for its Adaptation to Participatory Guarantee Systems\",\"authors\":\"Eugênio Martins de Sá Resende, Bianca Aparecida Lima Costa, Márcio Gomes Da Silva, Mamen Cuéllar Padilla, Isabel Maria Haro Pérez, Ihedilla Humberta Sinésio Cândido Da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: analyze the process of public regulation of organic production in Brazil, with a focus on Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) and Social Control Organizations (SCO). Method: The research employed document analysis of reports produced by civil society organizations, content analysis of two webinários on the subject, and conducted 12 interviews with representatives of Brazilian PGSs. Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework encompasses regulations and documents related to organic certification, agroecology, and social construction spaces, as well as current studies on PGS and participatory certification. Results and conclusion: The results presented in this work are part of the research project “Sistemas de confianza, producción ecológica y garantía. Innovaciones sociales al sello oficial en el contexto de los canales cortos de comercialización” developed by the University of Córdoba, Spain, in partnership with a team from the Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil. It is noteworthy that the excess of records, notes and regulatory controls hinder the inclusion and participation of peasants and farmers in organic quality assurance processes. Research implications: This discussion aims to contribute both to an expanded understanding of the social processes established for the regulation of organic production and to provide insights for the reformulation of current regulations in the country. Originality/value: A revision of the methods of verification, traceability, and social control is necessary, adapting them to the diverse socio-cultural realities existing in Brazil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"32 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析巴西有机生产的公共监管过程,重点关注参与性保证系统(PGS)和社会控制组织(SCO)。方法:对民间社会组织的报告进行文献分析,对两个webinários进行内容分析,并对12位巴西公共部门代表进行访谈。理论框架:理论框架包括有机认证、农业生态学、社会建设空间等相关法规和文件,以及PGS和参与式认证的研究现状。结果和结论:在这项工作中提出的结果是研究项目“Sistemas de confianza, producción ecológica y garantía”的一部分。该系统由西班牙Córdoba大学与巴西维萨罗萨联邦大学的一个团队合作开发。值得注意的是,过多的记录、注释和监管控制阻碍了农民和农民在有机质量保证过程中的纳入和参与。研究意义:本讨论旨在扩大对有机生产监管的社会过程的理解,并为该国现行法规的重新制定提供见解。原创性/价值:有必要对验证、可追溯性和社会控制的方法进行修订,使其适应巴西现有的各种社会文化现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulation of Organic Production in Brazil: Notes for its Adaptation to Participatory Guarantee Systems
Objective: analyze the process of public regulation of organic production in Brazil, with a focus on Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) and Social Control Organizations (SCO). Method: The research employed document analysis of reports produced by civil society organizations, content analysis of two webinários on the subject, and conducted 12 interviews with representatives of Brazilian PGSs. Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework encompasses regulations and documents related to organic certification, agroecology, and social construction spaces, as well as current studies on PGS and participatory certification. Results and conclusion: The results presented in this work are part of the research project “Sistemas de confianza, producción ecológica y garantía. Innovaciones sociales al sello oficial en el contexto de los canales cortos de comercialización” developed by the University of Córdoba, Spain, in partnership with a team from the Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil. It is noteworthy that the excess of records, notes and regulatory controls hinder the inclusion and participation of peasants and farmers in organic quality assurance processes. Research implications: This discussion aims to contribute both to an expanded understanding of the social processes established for the regulation of organic production and to provide insights for the reformulation of current regulations in the country. Originality/value: A revision of the methods of verification, traceability, and social control is necessary, adapting them to the diverse socio-cultural realities existing in Brazil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信