科学学习中的探究与辩论:提高学生科学论证能力的潜在策略

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ahmad Fauzi Hendratmoko, M. Madlazim, Wahono Widodo, Suyono Suyono, Zainul Arifin Imam Supardi
{"title":"科学学习中的探究与辩论:提高学生科学论证能力的潜在策略","authors":"Ahmad Fauzi Hendratmoko, M. Madlazim, Wahono Widodo, Suyono Suyono, Zainul Arifin Imam Supardi","doi":"10.46328/ijemst.3152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific argumentation skills are a key component of science learning practices needed by students in the 21st century. Where the essence of scientific argumentation is to support the argument with evidence and reasoning and then refute the claims and evidence of the opponent's argument. Supporting arguments with evidence and reasoning can be facilitated through inquiry activities. Meanwhile, refuting claims and evidence from opposing arguments can be facilitated through debate activities. Inquiry and debate can be a solution to improving students' scientific argumentation skills. This study aims to prove the truth of this statement through a systematic literature review by applying the PRISMA 2020 criteria which are expanded by bibliometric analysis with the help of the VOSviewer software. The results of the study show that research related to inquiry, debate, and their influence on students' scientific argumentation skills has a pretty good trend. In Indonesia the research climate is still quite good, research topics are still in great demand, and it is very possible to carry out research innovations on related topics. Another finding is that the integration of inquiry and debate in science learning can be a potential strategy to improve students' scientific argumentation skills.","PeriodicalId":44518,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","volume":"PAMI-6 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inquiry and Debate in Science Learning: Potential Strategy for Improving Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Fauzi Hendratmoko, M. Madlazim, Wahono Widodo, Suyono Suyono, Zainul Arifin Imam Supardi\",\"doi\":\"10.46328/ijemst.3152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific argumentation skills are a key component of science learning practices needed by students in the 21st century. Where the essence of scientific argumentation is to support the argument with evidence and reasoning and then refute the claims and evidence of the opponent's argument. Supporting arguments with evidence and reasoning can be facilitated through inquiry activities. Meanwhile, refuting claims and evidence from opposing arguments can be facilitated through debate activities. Inquiry and debate can be a solution to improving students' scientific argumentation skills. This study aims to prove the truth of this statement through a systematic literature review by applying the PRISMA 2020 criteria which are expanded by bibliometric analysis with the help of the VOSviewer software. The results of the study show that research related to inquiry, debate, and their influence on students' scientific argumentation skills has a pretty good trend. In Indonesia the research climate is still quite good, research topics are still in great demand, and it is very possible to carry out research innovations on related topics. Another finding is that the integration of inquiry and debate in science learning can be a potential strategy to improve students' scientific argumentation skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"PAMI-6 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学论证技能是21世纪学生科学学习实践的重要组成部分。其中科学论证的本质是用证据和推理来支持论点,然后反驳对手论点的主张和证据。通过探究活动,可以用证据和推理来支持论点。同时,通过辩论活动,可以方便地反驳对立论点的主张和证据。探究和辩论是提高学生科学论证能力的一种方法。本研究旨在通过系统的文献综述,通过应用PRISMA 2020标准,在VOSviewer软件的帮助下,通过文献计量分析进行扩展,证明这一说法的真实性。研究结果表明,与探究、辩论相关的研究及其对学生科学论证技能的影响有相当好的趋势。印尼的研究环境还是比较好的,研究课题的需求量还是很大的,在相关课题上进行研究创新是非常有可能的。另一个发现是,在科学学习中整合探究和辩论可以成为提高学生科学论证技能的潜在策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inquiry and Debate in Science Learning: Potential Strategy for Improving Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills
Scientific argumentation skills are a key component of science learning practices needed by students in the 21st century. Where the essence of scientific argumentation is to support the argument with evidence and reasoning and then refute the claims and evidence of the opponent's argument. Supporting arguments with evidence and reasoning can be facilitated through inquiry activities. Meanwhile, refuting claims and evidence from opposing arguments can be facilitated through debate activities. Inquiry and debate can be a solution to improving students' scientific argumentation skills. This study aims to prove the truth of this statement through a systematic literature review by applying the PRISMA 2020 criteria which are expanded by bibliometric analysis with the help of the VOSviewer software. The results of the study show that research related to inquiry, debate, and their influence on students' scientific argumentation skills has a pretty good trend. In Indonesia the research climate is still quite good, research topics are still in great demand, and it is very possible to carry out research innovations on related topics. Another finding is that the integration of inquiry and debate in science learning can be a potential strategy to improve students' scientific argumentation skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
23.10%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信