Ulfa Dwi Arizka
{"title":"","authors":"Ulfa Dwi Arizka","doi":"10.20884/1.ki.2023.15.2.6480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The health status of the people in Indonesia must be increase with program named PIS-PK. To be categorized in a healthy family, IKS (Healthy Family Index) has a standard of 0.8. Until now, the IKS in Indonesia still at 0.19 and the IKS in Jember Regency is still at 0.08. This study aims to analyze the implementation of PIS-PK policy in Jember Regency with study case research. The research was conducted at the Jember District Office, Jelbuk Public Health Center, and Gladak Pakem Public Health Center. The presentation of data is a narrative and validated by triangulation techniques. This research using four factors from Edward III's theory, namely communication, resource, disposition, and bureaucratic. The result showed that on the transmission factor has been running according the policy although there had a miss communication. On the resource factor, the needed for running program is appropriate although there are obstacles in the application which is used to input data that causes incompatibility of the input data and delays. Disposition factor, there had obstacles related to differences in operational definitions that made in confusion for implementors. The bureaucratic factor, there is no SOP for the implementation of PIS-PK in each public health center. Therefore, the Jember District Health Office is expected to be able to monitoring and evaluation in the implementation of PIS-PK. Then the advice given to Public Health Centers throughout Jember Regency is Public Health Center is expected to make SOPs, monitor and evaluate, use data from PIS-PK results properly, and the PIS-PK coordinator can coordinate well with all PIS-PK coordinators.","PeriodicalId":31897,"journal":{"name":"Kesmas Indonesia Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kesmas Indonesia Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.ki.2023.15.2.6480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度尼西亚人民的健康状况必须通过名为PIS-PK的计划来提高。健康家庭指数(IKS)的标准是0.8。到目前为止,印尼的IKS仍为0.19,去年11月的IKS仍为0.08。本研究旨在以个案研究的方式,分析十一月摄政时期PIS-PK政策的执行情况。这项研究是在Jember地区办事处、Jelbuk公共卫生中心和Gladak Pakem公共卫生中心进行的。数据的呈现是一种叙述,并通过三角测量技术进行验证。本研究采用爱德华三世理论中的四个因素,即沟通、资源、配置和官僚主义。结果表明,尽管存在误通信,但传输因子一直在按策略运行。在资源因素上,尽管应用程序中存在输入数据的障碍,导致输入数据不兼容和延迟,但运行程序所需的资源是适当的。配置因素,存在与操作定义的差异相关的障碍,这使实现者感到困惑。官僚主义因素,在每个公共卫生中心没有实施PIS-PK的SOP。因此,Jember地区卫生办事处预计将能够监测和评价PIS-PK的实施情况。然后给整个reggency的公共卫生中心的建议是,公共卫生中心应该制定sop,监测和评估,正确使用PIS-PK结果的数据,PIS-PK协调员可以与所有PIS-PK协调员很好地协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The health status of the people in Indonesia must be increase with program named PIS-PK. To be categorized in a healthy family, IKS (Healthy Family Index) has a standard of 0.8. Until now, the IKS in Indonesia still at 0.19 and the IKS in Jember Regency is still at 0.08. This study aims to analyze the implementation of PIS-PK policy in Jember Regency with study case research. The research was conducted at the Jember District Office, Jelbuk Public Health Center, and Gladak Pakem Public Health Center. The presentation of data is a narrative and validated by triangulation techniques. This research using four factors from Edward III's theory, namely communication, resource, disposition, and bureaucratic. The result showed that on the transmission factor has been running according the policy although there had a miss communication. On the resource factor, the needed for running program is appropriate although there are obstacles in the application which is used to input data that causes incompatibility of the input data and delays. Disposition factor, there had obstacles related to differences in operational definitions that made in confusion for implementors. The bureaucratic factor, there is no SOP for the implementation of PIS-PK in each public health center. Therefore, the Jember District Health Office is expected to be able to monitoring and evaluation in the implementation of PIS-PK. Then the advice given to Public Health Centers throughout Jember Regency is Public Health Center is expected to make SOPs, monitor and evaluate, use data from PIS-PK results properly, and the PIS-PK coordinator can coordinate well with all PIS-PK coordinators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信