打开闸门:大公司如何从内部众筹中获益

IF 5.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Claus P. Schöttl , Christian Homma , Tim G. Schweisfurth , Christina Raasch
{"title":"打开闸门:大公司如何从内部众筹中获益","authors":"Claus P. Schöttl ,&nbsp;Christian Homma ,&nbsp;Tim G. Schweisfurth ,&nbsp;Christina Raasch","doi":"10.1016/j.bushor.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital technologies enable employees at all levels to participate in distributed decision-making. We examine the design principles, benefits, and challenges of a new type of distributed decision-making: internal crowdfunding. We build on a 5-year case study of internal crowdfunding contests at Siemens to deepen our understanding of the design principles of internal crowdfunding and its potential for corporate innovation. Based on this data, we discuss the three design choices in internal crowdfunding (contributors, configuration, and control), find four key benefits (decentralization, cross-collaboration, institutionalization, and intrapreneurship), and identify three key challenges (dealing with rejected ideas, evaluation biases, and implementation and follow-on funding) and potential actions by managers to overcome them. The article contributes to both the emerging literature on internal crowdfunding and the literature on distributed decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48347,"journal":{"name":"Business Horizons","volume":"68 1","pages":"Pages 11-20"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opening the floodgates: How big companies can reap the benefits of internal crowdfunding\",\"authors\":\"Claus P. Schöttl ,&nbsp;Christian Homma ,&nbsp;Tim G. Schweisfurth ,&nbsp;Christina Raasch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bushor.2023.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Digital technologies enable employees at all levels to participate in distributed decision-making. We examine the design principles, benefits, and challenges of a new type of distributed decision-making: internal crowdfunding. We build on a 5-year case study of internal crowdfunding contests at Siemens to deepen our understanding of the design principles of internal crowdfunding and its potential for corporate innovation. Based on this data, we discuss the three design choices in internal crowdfunding (contributors, configuration, and control), find four key benefits (decentralization, cross-collaboration, institutionalization, and intrapreneurship), and identify three key challenges (dealing with rejected ideas, evaluation biases, and implementation and follow-on funding) and potential actions by managers to overcome them. The article contributes to both the emerging literature on internal crowdfunding and the literature on distributed decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Horizons\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 11-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681323000976\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681323000976","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字技术使各级员工都能参与分布式决策。我们研究了一种新型分布式决策的设计原则、好处和挑战:内部众筹。我们以为期五年的西门子公司内部众筹竞赛案例研究为基础,加深我们对内部众筹设计原则及其对企业创新潜力的理解。基于这些数据,我们讨论了内部众筹的三种设计选择(贡献者、配置和控制),发现了四个关键好处(分权、交叉协作、制度化和内部创业),并确定了三个关键挑战(处理被拒绝的想法、评估偏见、实施和后续资金)以及管理者克服这些挑战的潜在行动。本文对新兴的内部众筹文献和分布式决策文献都有贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opening the floodgates: How big companies can reap the benefits of internal crowdfunding
Digital technologies enable employees at all levels to participate in distributed decision-making. We examine the design principles, benefits, and challenges of a new type of distributed decision-making: internal crowdfunding. We build on a 5-year case study of internal crowdfunding contests at Siemens to deepen our understanding of the design principles of internal crowdfunding and its potential for corporate innovation. Based on this data, we discuss the three design choices in internal crowdfunding (contributors, configuration, and control), find four key benefits (decentralization, cross-collaboration, institutionalization, and intrapreneurship), and identify three key challenges (dealing with rejected ideas, evaluation biases, and implementation and follow-on funding) and potential actions by managers to overcome them. The article contributes to both the emerging literature on internal crowdfunding and the literature on distributed decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Business Horizons
Business Horizons BUSINESS-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Business Horizons, the bimonthly journal of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University, is dedicated to publishing original articles that appeal to both business academics and practitioners. Our editorial focus is on covering a diverse array of topics within the broader field of business, with a particular emphasis on identifying critical business issues and proposing practical solutions. Our goal is to inspire readers to approach business practices from new and innovative perspectives. Business Horizons occupies a distinctive position among business publications by offering articles that strike a balance between academic rigor and practical relevance. As such, our articles are grounded in scholarly research yet presented in a clear and accessible format, making them relevant to a broad audience within the business community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信